DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 84375--------------------------------------------------
Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: gainz
Date: August 6, 2025, 4:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all, I already appealed this and it came back rejected. The
ceo said to appeal on the grounds of unloading and no parking
available as I needed to be close to the post office due to
recent shoulder surgery. I sent them proof of unloading by way
of po receipt. i thought they might request more evidence so i
could send surgery details but alas no. Is this worth persuing?
HTML https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1dDlhj-IsLYTNJWe7O9faS2KtV-7kuasV?usp=sharing
#Post#: 84385--------------------------------------------------
Re: Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: August 6, 2025, 5:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, but could you request the administrator add this to your
existing previous thread. Setting up more than one thrad for the
same PCN causes confusion, so we discourage it.
#Post#: 84386--------------------------------------------------
Re: Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: Enceladus
Date: August 6, 2025, 5:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This PCN is for parking across a lowered kerb not for
loading/unloading as implied. The lowered kerb is also marked
with tactile paving slabs. It's situated at a junction and is
clearly intended for use as a pedestrian parking. And marked
unnecessarily by double yellow lines.
You were not allowed to park blocking the lowered kerb at all.
It's anti-social so your mitigation is unlikely to carry much
weight.
#Post#: 84388--------------------------------------------------
Re: Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: August 6, 2025, 5:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This is a new case I think - the OP has rapidly become one of
our frequent flyers.
Looks bang to rights.
Have you got a copy of your challenge as loading is an
exemption. What was the package?
HTML https://i.ibb.co/F4nTZKDY/en3.jpg
HTML https://i.ibb.co/G3xms0fm/en2.jpg
HTML https://i.ibb.co/H1GSGKX/en1.jpg
#Post#: 84400--------------------------------------------------
Re: Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: Enceladus
Date: August 6, 2025, 6:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Was it here?
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/DsKqxYkULrns4WS37
If not, then please post up a GSV link to the location.
The kerb seems to have yellow kerb dashes which indicate loading
restrictions apply. They are badly worn and I can't determine if
they are single (part-time) or double (24 x 7) dashes.
Are you able to confirm if there is a loading time-plate at the
corner and what it says? The most recent GSV, assuming I have
the location correct, suggests single dashes which apply 8.00 -
9.30am and 4.30-6.30pm. However that was the case May 2016 so
may well be out of date.
That said the loading/unloading restrictions apply to the DYL.
And the DYLs alongside the lowered kerb are unnecessary, as
there is an overriding ban on parking by the lowered kerb. You
would have to show that it was necessary to park in that
specific place in order to carry out your loading or unloading
and then subject to a limit of 20 mins. The fact that there was
nowhere else available for you to park wouldn't cut it.
Be aware that other boroughs would have impounded your car.
#Post#: 84424--------------------------------------------------
Re: Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: gainz
Date: August 6, 2025, 8:55 am
---------------------------------------------------------
yes it was where the link is thanks couldnt do it this time.
Sorry its a new pcn and don't know whats going on but this is
third one in just a few weeks. madness. I will be more vigilant
in future. There isnt a loading sign. Could you remove my vrn
please from the pictures?
-Question 1 : 'Please explain in as much detail as possible why
you think your PCN should be cancelled'
Answer : 'I was unloading large items for the post
office. there was no parking available and i cannot carry these
items for distance due to recent shoulder surgery. I saw the
parking attendant and explaind this to him. he could not cancel
the pcn so please do so i have further supporting evidence if
needed. Please cancel.'
-Question 2 : 'Would you like to upload any other documents to
support your case?'
Answer : 'Yes'
-Question 3 : 'Please upload a copy of your supporting
document(s)'
Answer : 'File uploaded - 'po.pdf''
#Post#: 84434--------------------------------------------------
Re: Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: August 6, 2025, 10:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OP, this is the only potential exception in this case:
(5)The fourth exception is where—
(a)the vehicle is being used for the purposes of delivering
goods to, or collecting goods from, any premises, or is being
loaded from or unloaded to any premises,
(b)the delivery, collection, loading or unloading cannot
reasonably be carried out in relation to those premises without
the vehicle being parked as mentioned in subsection (1), and
(c)the vehicle is so parked for no longer than is necessary and
for no more than 20 minutes.
My emphasis.
You are looking to qualify under (b), but we don't know anything
about details, and details matter.
What were you taking to the Post Office?
#Post#: 84613--------------------------------------------------
Re: Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: gainz
Date: August 7, 2025, 10:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
returning items but that were in large boxes.
#Post#: 84634--------------------------------------------------
Re: Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: August 7, 2025, 11:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
As you can probably guess, that description is unlikely to meet
the requirements of the exception.
As you were '..unloading large items for the post office'
they'll be a paper trail(which you say you produced to the
authority with your reps) at least as far as the number of items
is concerned.
Where is this?
#Post#: 84687--------------------------------------------------
Re: Enfield Code 27 CEO said to appeal
DIR By: BigBazz45
Date: August 8, 2025, 1:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
GSV (with the Post Office visible on Green Lanes):
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/Dytw6JiZXDVXpddHA
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page