URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 84253--------------------------------------------------
       PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: Leew914
       Date: August 5, 2025, 10:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have been asked to assist my daughter who has received a PCN
       as RK for an alleged non payment of parking.
       I will upload the PCN tomorrow, but what is clear from the
       picture she sent me is that the event date and the issue date
       are over a month apart - 34 days.
       Will this be enough to appeal on its own and if so, is there a
       standard response for this?
       Thanks in advance.
       #Post#: 84268--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: Sander333
       Date: August 5, 2025, 11:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As you suggest post up PCN for accurate advice so it can be
       examined in detail
       #Post#: 84270--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: August 5, 2025, 11:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Also check the address and the date on the V5C.
       #Post#: 86070--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: Leew914
       Date: August 18, 2025, 4:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good morning all,
       Sorry, there was a loss of the original notice and had to wait
       for the reminder!
       All addresses on V5 are correct, the notice was just outside of
       the 14 days as required.
       PCN redacted and attached.
       #Post#: 86071--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: JustLoveCars
       Date: August 18, 2025, 4:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You've posted the reminder.
       How about the original?
       (Oh, and the way you've redacted the address isn't ideal, i.e. I
       can see the postcode ends in JF)
       #Post#: 86077--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: b789
       Date: August 18, 2025, 4:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A PCN reminder is useless. WE would need to know the actual
       issue date of the ORIGINAL Notice to Keeper (NtK). However, it
       is as rare as hens teeth for ParkingEye to fail to issue an NtK
       for delivery within the relevant period.
       So, working on the assumption that the original NtK was issued
       correctly, we would need to first establish why the driver
       received the PCN in the first place. Did the driver fail to pay
       for parking or overstay a period of parking that had been paid
       for?
       In other words, is the allegation of the contravention correct?
       If it is, then what defence or mitigation are you suggesting?
       There is usually a flaw in all ParkingEye NtKs but you'd have to
       be really persuasive to get POPLA to understand it. All PE NtKs
       fail PoFA 9(2)(e)(i) as they fail to invite the Keeper to pay
       the charge. They only tell the Keeper to pass the notice to the
       driver and inform them of the details.
       As you would have to explain this to POPLA, you first need to
       appeal and only once that has been rejected, would you receive a
       POPLA code. As the initial NtK was probably issued well over 28
       days ago, they are not likely to accept an appeal at this stage,
       which means too late to get a POPLA code.
       Next is likely to be useless debt recovery letters which can be
       safely ignored. Debt collectors are powerless to do anything
       except to try and persuade the low-hanging fruit on the gullible
       tree to pay up out of ignorance and fear.
       What you need to know is that eventually, the Keeper will
       receive a Letter of Claim (LoC). Depending on whether they have
       farmed it out to a bulk litigation company or are doing it
       through their own in-house legal team, will leave you with a
       couple of options.
       If they farm it out, you won't be paying a penny if you follow
       the advice. If they keep it in house, you would only have a
       50:50 chance of successfully defending it.
       What do you want or intend to do?
       #Post#: 86098--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: Leew914
       Date: August 18, 2025, 6:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The issue date was the same on the original PCN, it was
       delivered early August, no other correspondence before then.
       #Post#: 86100--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: b789
       Date: August 18, 2025, 6:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A postal Notice to Keeper (NtK) cannot have the same issue date
       as the date of the contravention.
       #Post#: 86104--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: Leew914
       Date: August 18, 2025, 6:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have found the original PCN, attached.
       Event date 27/26/25
       Issue date 31/07/25
       #Post#: 86105--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN issued after 14 days
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: August 18, 2025, 6:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you are definitely the registered keeper then this is a rare
       example of a ParkingEye golden ticket and you can appeal as the
       keeper with the below:
       [indent]Dear Sirs,
       I have received your Parking Charge Notice (Ref: ________) for
       vehicle registration mark ____ ___, in which you allege that the
       driver has incurred a parking charge. I note from your
       correspondence that you are not seeking to hold me liable as the
       registered keeper, under Schedule 4 of the Protection of
       Freedoms Act 2012 ("The Act"). You have chosen not to issue a
       Notice to Keeper in accordance with The Act, and it is now too
       late for you to do so.
       There is no obligation for me to name the driver and I will not
       be doing so. I am therefore unable to help you further with this
       matter, and look forward to your confirmation that the charge
       has been cancelled. If you choose to decline this appeal, you
       must issue a POPLA code.
       Yours,[/indent]
       If appealing online, be careful there are no drop down/tick
       boxes that cause you to identify who was driving, and keep a
       close eye on your spam folder for their response. If they do not
       respond within 28 days, chase them.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page