URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 84239--------------------------------------------------
        G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bishop
       By: happyRR Date: August 5, 2025, 9:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       I received CCJ about parking charge from February 2025. Keeping
       story short... due to some family events I kept ignoring all
       letters from DCBL and considering I paid a penalty on time I
       thought this is a basic misunderstanding.
       06/02/2025 - date of contravention
       18/02/2025 - paid G24 Ltd (received a confirmation and all
       reference numbers are matching)
       Then after that I've got 2-3 DCBL/DCBLegal letters and then CCJ
       from 29/06/2025 as per picture. I called them and the guy said
       there is nothing he can do as G24 Ltd referred to them as it was
       unpaid. The "funny" thing is that I genuinely paid them, so defo
       G24 didn't record this somehow. Looks like because I received
       already letter from court the only thing is to defend it now, am
       I right? Or still should I call DCBL and demand to remove court
       case base on the payment confirmation?
       Thanks
       #Post#: 84240--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bis
       hop
       By: jfollows Date: August 5, 2025, 10:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       “CCJ” stands for County Court Judgement, this is a claim form
       which only leads to a CCJ if you ignore it or if you contest it
       and lose. Even in the latter case, the judgement is expunged if
       paid within 30 days and has no negative impact on your credit
       ability if so.
       #Post#: 84242--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bis
       hop
       By: happyRR Date: August 5, 2025, 10:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for quick reply,however I'm still not sure what's the
       best to do now? Should I contest it? I found other threads about
       similar offence, just not sure if I can reuse the same forms or
       I should try talk to DCBLegal again that I paid for the original
       PCN.
       #Post#: 84245--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bis
       hop
       By: jfollows Date: August 5, 2025, 10:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you follow the process and put up a defence then the case
       will be discontinued before DCB Legal need to pay the court fee,
       it’s their modus operandi.
       Your defence being that the claim is denied because you paid the
       original invoice and have proof of having done so.
       The normal process requires you to file a defence, then a N180
       form to ensure that a court hearing in person at your local
       court is established, but it won’t actually come to pass because
       DCB Legal will give up.
       Common sense would be that you could get G24 to call it off now,
       but don’t call them (or anyone), put it in writing by email or
       post. Deal with the organ grinder, not the useless bulk
       brainless legal people.
       #Post#: 84274--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bis
       hop
       By: b789 Date: August 5, 2025, 11:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       With an issue date of 29th July you have until 4pm on Monday
       18th August to submit your defence. If you submit an
       Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) before then, you would then
       have until 4pm on Monday 1st September to submit your defence.
       You only need to submit an AoS if you need extra time to prepare
       your defence. If you want to submit an AoS then follow the
       instructions in this linked PDF:
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqu3bask5m0zir/money-claim-online-How-to-Acknowledge.pdf?dl=0
       Until very recently, we never advised using the MCOL to submit a
       defence. However, due to recent systemic failures within the
       CNBC, we feel that it is safer to now submit a short defence
       using MCOL as it is instantly submitted and entered into the
       "system". Whilst it will deny the use of some formatting or
       inclusion of transcripts etc. these can always be included with
       the Witness Statement (WS) later, if it ever progresses that
       far.
       You will need to copy and paste it into the defence text box on
       MCOL. It has been checked to make sure that it will fit into the
       65 characters per line and 122 lines limit.
       [quote][font=Courier New]1. The Defendant denies the claim in
       its entirety. The Defendant
       asserts that there is no liability to the Claimant and that no
       debt is owed. The claim is without merit and does not adequately
       disclose any comprehensible cause of action.
       2. There is a lack of precise detail in the Particulars of Claim
       (PoC) in respect of the factual and legal allegations made
       against the Defendant such that the PoC do not adequately comply
       with CPR 16.4.
       3. The Defendant is unable to plead properly to the PoC because:
       (a) The contract referred to is not detailed or attached to the
       PoC in accordance with CPR PD 16.7.3(1);
       (b) The PoC do not state the exact wording of the clause
       (or clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract (or
       contracts) which is/are relied on;
       (c) The PoC do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons)
       why the claimant asserts the defendant has breached the contract
       (or contracts);
       (d) The PoC do not state with sufficient particularity exactly
       where the breach occurred, the exact time when the breach
       occurred and how long it is alleged that the vehicle was parked
       before the parking charge was allegedly incurred;
       (e) The PoC do not state precisely how the sum claimed is
       calculated, including the basis for any statutory interest,
       damages, or other charges;
       (f) The PoC do not state what proportion of the claim is the
       parking charge and what proportion is damages;
       (g) The PoC do not provide clarity on whether the Defendant is
       sued as the driver or the keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant
       cannot plead alternative causes of action without specificity.
       4. The Defendant submits that courts have previously struck out
       similar claims of their own initiative for failure to adequately
       comply with CPR 16.4, particularly where the Particulars of
       Claim failed to specify the contractual terms relied upon or
       explain the alleged breach with sufficient clarity.
       5. In comparable cases involving modest sums, judges have found
       that requiring further case management steps would be
       disproportionate and contrary to the overriding objective.
       Accordingly, strike-out was deemed appropriate. The Defendant
       submits that the same reasoning applies in this case and invites
       the court to adopt a similar approach by striking out the claim
       due to the Claimant’s failure to adequately comply with
       CPR 16.4, rather than permitting an amendment. The Defendant
       proposes that the following Order be made:
       Draft Order:
       Of the Court's own initiative and upon reading the particulars
       of claim and the defence.
       AND the court being of the view that the particulars of claim
       do not adequately comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a) because:
       (a) they do not set out the exact wording of the clause
       (or clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract which
       is (or are) relied on; and
       (b) they do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons) why
       the claimant asserts that the defendant was in breach of
       contract.
       AND the claimant could have complied with CPR 16.4(1)(a) had it
       served separate detailed particulars of claim, as it could have
       done pursuant to CPR PD 7C.5.2(2), but chose not to do so.
       AND upon the claim being for a very modest sum such that the
       court considers it disproportionate and not in accordance with
       the overriding objective to allot to this case any further share
       of the court's resources by ordering further particulars of
       claim and a further defence, each followed by further referrals
       to the judge for case management.
       ORDER:
       1. The claim is struck out.
       2. Permission to either party to apply to set aside, vary or
       stay this order by application on notice, which must be filed at
       this Court not more than 5 days after service of this order,
       failing which no such application may be made.[/font][/quote]
       #Post#: 87785--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bis
       hop
       By: happyRR Date: August 30, 2025, 6:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for that! All completed and sent online and just received
       a letter that defence has been received.
       #Post#: 90538--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bis
       hop
       By: happyRR Date: September 18, 2025, 12:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       Just received DQ (Form N180) and date till 03 October to reply.
       Found other responses about filling DQ, just not sure if mine
       should be different as I have paid to G24 Ltd as per my entry
       post.
       Please advice.
       #Post#: 90577--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bis
       hop
       By: b789 Date: September 19, 2025, 2:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm assuming you "paid" G24 the charge for the PCN but they have
       continued to chase you for the money. Have you checked to see
       whether your original payment actually went through?
       You seem unaware that you are being sued for whatever the charge
       is they are chasing you. You have defended the claim and
       eventually this will all go away when the claim is either struck
       out or discontinued.
       For now, just follow the advice. Having received your own N180
       (make sure it is not simply a copy of the claimants N180), do
       not use the paper form. Ignore all the other forms that came
       with it. you can discard those. Download your own here and fill
       it in on your computer. You sign it by simply typing your full
       name in the signature box.
  HTML https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/673341e779e9143625613543/N180_1124.pdf
       Here are the answers to some of the less obvious questions:
       [indent]• The name of the court is "Civil National Business
       Centre".
       • To be completed by "Your full name" and you are the
       "Defendant".
       • C1: "YES"
       • D1: "NO". Reason: "I wish to question the Claimant about their
       evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any
       misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions.
       Given the Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking
       case paperwork for a living, having this case heard solely on
       papers would appear to put the Claimant at an unfair advantage,
       especially as they would no doubt prefer the Defendant not to
       have the opportunity to expose the issues in the Claimants
       template submissions or speak as the only true witness to events
       in question.."
       • F1: Whichever is your nearest county court. Use this to find
       it:
  HTML https://www.find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk/search-option
       • F3: "1".
       • Sign the form by simply typing your full name for the
       signature.[/indent]
       When you have completed the form, attach it to a single email
       addressed to both dq.cnbc[member=6517]justice[/member].gov.uk
       and info@dcblegal.co.uk and CC in yourself. Make sure that the
       claim number is in the subject field of the email.
       #Post#: 93907--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bis
       hop
       By: happyRR Date: October 13, 2025, 11:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       Regarding G24 and payment... I've got an email confirmation and
       it's taken from my bank account. I've called DCBLegal about this
       when I've got letter from the court but in their words it's 2
       late as it was already allocated to the court etc. I have tried
       to talk to someone more competent but couldn't pass 1st line of
       the support (I gave up explaining this to their support as I
       knew I need to reply to the court case anyway). To be honest
       it's a bit my fault as English is not my first language and I
       mistranslated an email I've received at early days of this case.
       More or less, considering that I've paid and I've got a proof,
       should I prepare differently for mediation call allocated in
       November? I've found few other threads, so can follow the same
       structure, however wondering if I should do this a differently?
       Thanks
       #Post#: 93944--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  G24 Ltd PCN / CCJ – Exceeding stay duration – Homebase, Bis
       hop
       By: b789 Date: October 13, 2025, 3:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You never, ever, 'call' these people! A phone call is not worth
       the paper it isn't written on should you need to revert back to
       anything said!
       Can we please clarify how much did you pay? How much is the
       claim for? Show us the Particulars of Claim (PoC).
       If you have proof of having paid the PCN in full, then send the
       following email to DCB Legal at info@dcblegal.co.uk and CC
       yourself:
       [quote]Re: G24 Ltd v [Defendant] – Claim no. [xxxxx]
       Dear Sirs,
       The alleged parking charge dated 06/02/2025 was paid in full on
       18/02/2025. Enclosed/attached are:
       [indent]• Bank statement extract (payer: [name], payee: G24 Ltd,
       date 18/02/2025, amount £[ ], reference [xxxxxxxx])
       • G24 payment confirmation/receipt showing the same
       reference.[/indent]
       Your client’s claim is therefore hopeless. Please confirm by
       return that the claim will be discontinued.
       Failing discontinuance within 7 days, the Defendant will apply
       for strike-out under CPR 3.4(2)(a)/(b) and seek costs under CPR
       27.14(2)(g) for unreasonable conduct.
       Yours faithfully,
       [full name][/quote]
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page