URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 84700--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Baliff (newlyn) took my car months after i already paid the
       debt, please help
   DIR By: Bailiff Advice
       Date: August 8, 2025, 4:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > So the matter has been brought under control.
       --- End Quote ---
       I would disagree,
       Why on earth has he not either filed an Out of Time Application
       (at no cost) or even made a Formal Complaint to Newlyn (also
       free).
       #Post#: 84726--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Baliff (newlyn) took my car months after i already paid the
       debt, please help
   DIR By: 404BrainNotFound
       Date: August 8, 2025, 5:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I should make clear that the original traffic contravention is
       not in dispute. Freedom paid the debt in full, which discharged
       both the warrant and the enforcement power, as evidenced by the
       flow of funds to Newlyn. I appreciate that HC Andersen means
       well, but the traffic penalty is now academic.
       My username changed because someone altered the password on my
       original account, which forced me to create a new one. It may
       well have been a forum software error.
       Filing an out-of-time application is inappropriate in this
       instance because the warrant has already been discharged. While
       I acknowledge that paragraph 8.1 of Practice Direction 75
       provides for the suspension of a warrant, in this case the
       warrant was discharged pursuant to paragraph 6(3) of Schedule 12
       to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
       Submitting a formal complaint to a private company such as
       Newlyn is misconceived, as the prescribed formal complaints
       procedure applies only to public authorities. Newlyn is a
       private entity, and its directors have no statutory powers.
       The correct course of action is to submit a free request to
       Newlyn under CPR 31.17 for disclosure of the following:
       (a) the warrant, showing its issue date
       (b) evidence of the receipt and flow of funds that discharged
       the warrant, together with any evidence of the subsequent
       refund.
       (c) proof that the enforcement agent paid any storage fees,
       identifying the recipient of the payment and the reason it was
       incurred, compliant with regulation 8(2) of the Taking Control
       of Goods (Fees) Regulations 2014
       (d) the enforcement agent's vehicle condition report
       (e) the enforcement agent's body-worn camera footage
       This material will allow for a proper assessment and
       quantification of any damage to the vehicle in support of a
       claim against Barnet.
       Once the evidence is received from Newlyn, it will be reviewed
       alongside the client's own evidence and the present condition of
       the vehicle as observed at the pound. Barnet will then be given
       the opportunity to inspect the vehicle prior to any repairs
       being undertaken and will subsequently be invited to settle the
       claim in accordance with the Pre-Action Conduct and Protocol.
       #Post#: 84741--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Baliff (newlyn) took my car months after i already paid the
       debt, please help
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: August 8, 2025, 6:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I appreciate that HC Andersen means well, but the traffic
       penalty is now academic.
       Not really. The penalty reveals the legislation which reveals
       whether an OOT - a course which courses its way through this
       thread - is applicable.
       Which addresses BAO's concern because an OOT is not a silver
       bullet, it sits within road traffic contravention procedure and
       if it's not an available route, then it isn't.
       If this procedure is abandoned - perhaps because some posters
       are privvy to information as yet unrevealed by the OP - then
       this should be explained to the OP who, after all, is owner of
       the thread.
       #Post#: 84748--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Baliff (newlyn) took my car months after i already paid the
       debt, please help
   DIR By: 404BrainNotFound
       Date: August 8, 2025, 6:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I understand where you are coming from in trying to resolve a
       traffic contravention, but Freedom was clear from the outset
       that neither the contravention nor the associated debt is in
       dispute.
       Submitting an out-of-time application using forms PE2 and PE3
       would not succeed, as form PE3 specifically asks whether the
       motorist failed to receive key statutory notices or a response
       after making timely representations or an appeal. Since Freedom
       does not dispute the contravention, PE3 is not the appropriate
       form. Form PE2, which asks why the application is being made out
       of time, is also unsuitable, as Freedom already paid the debt
       directly to Newlyn and evidenced the flow of money.
       #Post#: 84752--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Baliff (newlyn) took my car months after i already paid the
       debt, please help
   DIR By: Bailiff Advice
       Date: August 8, 2025, 7:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: 404BrainNotFound link ---
       >
       >
       > Submitting an out-of-time application using forms PE2 and PE3
       would not succeed, as form PE3 specifically asks whether the
       motorist failed to receive key statutory notices or a response
       after making timely representations or an appeal. Since Freedom
       does not dispute the contravention, PE3 is not the appropriate
       form.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       To be clear, this is what I posted 3 days ago when suggesting an
       Out of Time Application.
       Submitting an Out of Time Application needs careful wording. In
       your initial post, you mention being away for months and to
       confuse matters, you also mention that you got the PCN whilst
       rushing to the hospital. Can you clarify the position. If you
       had been away for months, would you be able to provide any
       evidence with your application to back this up?
       #Post#: 84762--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Baliff (newlyn) took my car months after i already paid the
       debt, please help
   DIR By: 404BrainNotFound
       Date: August 8, 2025, 7:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You should review form PE3 carefully, as it contains a sworn
       declaration that must be true. Until the warrant address is
       confirmed, Freedom cannot safely declare whether the Notice to
       Owner was received, and any premature statement could expose him
       to an allegation of perjury.
       #Post#: 84763--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Baliff (newlyn) took my car months after i already paid the
       debt, please help
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: August 8, 2025, 7:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, are you still with us?
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 5
   DIR Previous Page