DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 102463--------------------------------------------------
Re: MCOL received - assistance required
By: Unknown_Driver? Date: December 15, 2025, 4:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Merry Christmas from DCB Legal....... ;D
Nope, it`s not a Christmas card I`m referring to... but another
claim form, from Northampton, which arrived today.
DCB Legal have bulk added this new court claim for myself, to
Northampton`s already bulging list of court claims.
I shall either, post it in this thread, if that is best, or
start a new thread, as this new claim has been initiated by the
usual "non-compliance", from a different parking company.
The claim, which this thread was started with, was by "I Park
Services Ltd", and this new claim has been initiated by " Euro
Car Park Services Ltd".
#Post#: 102467--------------------------------------------------
Re: MCOL received - assistance required
By: jfollows Date: December 15, 2025, 4:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/house-rules/
says
[quote] We operate some "house rules" on the site.
1. We operate a "one case, one thread" rule. This means that you
should keep any posts relating to one case (one incident of
speeding, one PCN, etc) to a single thread. Do not start
multiple topics on the same case.[/quote]
#Post#: 102469--------------------------------------------------
Re: MCOL received - assistance required
By: b789 Date: December 15, 2025, 4:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes, a separate thread for each case if it is a different
location/firm. However, I can assure you that the outcome is
going to be identical... a strike out or discontinuation.
#Post#: 106160--------------------------------------------------
Re: MCOL received - assistance required
By: Unknown_Driver? Date: January 16, 2026, 6:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
On a different subject, and rather than starting a new
post/thread.
I have 1 old (4 and a half years) CCJ,-obtained by Excel Parking
Services, whereby now, BW Legal, have took it upon themselves,
to write to me, asking for a "proposed settlement figure"- with
a 45% discount off the CCJ.
Do these companies ever just consider, which I`m sure they do,
the cost of enforcement (£91 for a Warrant of Control), versus
the actual "hope/chance" they have, of securing the actual
amount of the original CCJ?
#Post#: 106169--------------------------------------------------
Re: MCOL received - assistance required
By: DWMB2 Date: January 16, 2026, 7:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Sending letters is cheap.
As for onward enforcement, the short answer is I don't know -
this is primarily a private parking tickets forum, rather than a
debt advice forum, which means we don't see many cases where
someone has an 'old' (aka beyond the possibility of set aside)
CCJ.
How much is the debt? A larger debt might increase the
motivation to seek enforcement.
#Post#: 106198--------------------------------------------------
Re: MCOL received - assistance required
By: Unknown_Driver? Date: January 16, 2026, 9:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It is £270.
Still within its 6 year capacity, until August 2027.
I guess, by offering a 45% discount, it`s unlikely they will
consider enforcement.. which of course, comes at quite a cost
(£91).
#Post#: 106199--------------------------------------------------
Re: MCOL received - assistance required
By: DWMB2 Date: January 16, 2026, 9:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
£91 is loose change to a company issuing as many charges as
Excel, but I'd be somewhat surprised if they did.
A debt over £600 would be much more tempting, as that would be
above the threshold at which they could seek to involve High
Court Enforcement Officers, as opposed to County Court Bailiffs.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page