URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 81985--------------------------------------------------
       Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: ahsan
       Date: July 21, 2025, 1:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi Wizards,
       I hope all of you are well.
       My brother does Amazon parcel delivery, he had multiple parcel
       drops at the location, he couldn't have parked the Van on main
       road as it's double yellow lines all the way.
       We have received the ticket that he spent 23 mins and now have
       to pay £100 (within 14 days £60).
       Paying £60 takes pretty much half of his days wages, it seems
       cruel for them to issue tickets to Van holder when they know
       they either came to do some work at the address or to drop
       parcels and stuff.
       Ticket can be seen in the GDrive:
       Front page:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vR0zfAN3k6w24_eoChilJaPDp0LAj0RY/view?usp=drive_link
       Back page:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/18M4OH33F-1SFYlfoMsUq4GGj2kewwlFA/view?usp=drive_link
       GSV:
  HTML https://tinyurl.com/343aypz5
       Ticket issued by and can be viewed at:
  HTML https://portal.parkingeye.co.uk
       Parking Charge Reference: 128753/610483
       Vehicle Registration Number: KN71EYD
       Can you please suggest if something can be done about this
       ticket?
       #Post#: 82065--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: Dave65
       Date: July 22, 2025, 4:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If the delivery was to residents of the housing then:
       Jopson & Homeguard may come in to the issue.
       Regulars will explain.
       #Post#: 82137--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: b789
       Date: July 22, 2025, 9:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Tell your brother to read the Highway Code. Stopping to load or
       unload on double yellow lines (DYL) is not prohibited. Only if
       the kerb has the yellow "blips", is it prohibited.
       It's impossible to read the first two section of the back of the
       Notice to Keeper (NtK) you have shown us. Those are the only two
       parts that matter!
       --- Quote from: ahsan link ---
       >
       > ...it seems cruel for them to issue tickets to Van holder when
       they know they either came to do some work at the address or to
       drop parcels and stuff.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       How does the ANPR know that the van is being used to deliver
       Amazon packages?
       As the driver was loading and unloading, this can be defended if
       it ever went as far as court. In most cases, it will never get
       that far, but you have to go through the motions.
       For now, simply follow this advice... There is no legal
       obligation on the known keeper (the recipient of the Notice to
       Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity of the unknown driver and
       no inference or assumptions can be made.
       The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which
       means that if the unknown driver is not identified, they cannot
       transfer liability for the charge from the unknown driver to the
       known keeper.
       Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove
       anything from it:
       --- Quote ---
       > Subject: Appeal against Parking Charge Notice – [Insert PCN
       Reference]
       >
       > I am the registered keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your
       'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement
       and will be making a formal complaint to your client landowner
       regarding your predatory conduct.
       >
       > Your Notice to Keeper (NtK) fails to comply with the mandatory
       requirements of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act
       2012 (PoFA), specifically paragraph 9(2)(e)(i). This provision
       requires the NtK to invite the keeper to pay the unpaid parking
       charges. Your notice merely states that the driver is liable and
       instructs the keeper to pass the notice to the driver and
       provide their details. That is not sufficient. The statutory
       wording is clear: unless the NtK invites the keeper to pay, you
       cannot transfer liability. Partial or substantial compliance is
       legally inadequate.
       >
       > There will be no admission as to who was driving, and no
       assumptions or inferences may be drawn. ParkingEye has relied on
       contract law allegations of breach against the driver only. The
       registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been
       the driver, nor pursued under any misinterpretation of agency
       law.
       >
       > Further, the driver was engaged in legitimate
       loading/unloading activity while delivering packages to multiple
       units within the complex. This took approximately 23 minutes and
       falls squarely within the scope of Jopson v Homeguard [2016]
       B9GF0A9E, where His Honour Judge Harris QC stated:
       >
       > [indent]“A milkman leaving his float to carry bottles to the
       flat would not be ‘parked’. Nor would a postman delivering
       letters… Any other approach would leave life in the block of
       flats close to unworkable.”[/indent]
       >
       > This was a delivery operation, not a breach of any parking
       terms. Your attempt to penalise such activity is unreasonable
       and unsupported by law. You have no hope at POPLA, so you are
       urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the
       PCN.
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 82145--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: ahsan
       Date: July 22, 2025, 9:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=26]b789[/member] I do apologize, I have now taken a
       fresh screenshot of the back of the page, here is the pic which
       is clear and readable:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1W68IjjDEAeq0WkvRLCfTzs1lO9402bJw/view?usp=drive_link
       #Post#: 82148--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: b789
       Date: July 22, 2025, 10:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Follow the advice already given.
       #Post#: 82377--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: ahsan
       Date: July 23, 2025, 11:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=26]b789[/member] I have appealed today, Ill update as
       soon as I receive a reply from them.
       Thanks for your help, much appreciated.
       #Post#: 84816--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: ahsan
       Date: August 8, 2025, 12:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=26]b789[/member], I've received an update to our appeal
       today, here is the letter they sent us try to scare with their
       language:
       PDF:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JuMURUHC-k67mnUXbNRv0w74ba0DwdQ_/view?usp=drive_link
       PIC:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1o8wI8ZvOaS5ALAp3g5nucBEXuXByV0Mu/view?usp=drive_link
       Could you please advise next step?
       Thanks.
       #Post#: 84818--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: August 8, 2025, 12:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You already said
       --- Quote ---
       > There will be no admission as to who was driving,
       --- End Quote ---
       so this is just an attempt to get you to do otherwise.
       Do nothing, and they will reject your appeal but give you a
       POPLA code.
       #Post#: 90055--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: ahsan
       Date: September 15, 2025, 11:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=26]b789[/member] I have received an email from
       ParkingEye today, they have issued the POPLA code:
       Document link:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/13n0x9m7HRwVB8r1NVfrIhpmk0FbO3HnZ/view?usp=sharing
       Can you please advise what should be the next step?
       Thanks in advance.
       #Post#: 90145--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Forest housing association - E11 2QT - Time in car park
   DIR By: b789
       Date: September 16, 2025, 4:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You have 33 days for the date of the appeal rejection to submit
       a POPLA appeal. Just do a search of the forum for any recent
       POPLA appeals to get an idea of what you should put in and how
       to structure a POPLA appeal.
       When you think you have something, post it here and we will
       advise on whether it needs refining.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 5
   DIR Next Page