URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 81103--------------------------------------------------
       Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd / Balgores Rd
       RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: ynx
       Date: July 15, 2025, 9:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       I'm seeking guidance and assistance with a PCN from the London
       Borough of Havering for an alleged contravention of 47J -
       Stopped on a restricted bus stop or stand.
       The alleged contravention occurred on 16 June 2025, and the PCN
       dated 11 July 2025 was received today, 15 July 2025.
       - PCN:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/zTCG6jQW/pcn1.jpg
       (please let me know
       if you need the other pages as well)
       - Video:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bT9Ps_Dsg-NQcQR-2_x3c8IdA2ly_U2q/view?usp=sharing
       - Google Street View:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/YY9yKh7gXKJRT23d9
       As you can see, the driver stopped at a bus stop for
       approximately 10 seconds to pick up a passenger. The driver
       didn't realise there was a clearway sign attached to the bus
       stop pole further down (you can see on the video when the driver
       realised while departing). Confusingly, there is a pole at the
       beginning of the bay, right next to where the car stopped, with
       no signage.
       Additionally, I'd be grateful if someone could clarify the
       timelines for me, as I'm not sure what dates are relevant (issue
       or actual delivery?), and how the 28 days are calculated. The
       PCN was received today, 15 July 2025 (Tuesday), despite being
       issued on 11 July 2025 (Friday). If my math is correct, this
       makes it 29 days after the alleged contravention (or 30 days if
       the day of contravention is also counted).
       I would like to understand if it makes sense to challenge this,
       and if so, how should I phrase my representation?
       Many thanks!
       #Post#: 81132--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd /
       Balgores Rd RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 15, 2025, 10:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       2 days is allowed for the post, plus the 28 days limit on
       service of a PCN.
       #Post#: 81136--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd /
       Balgores Rd RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: mrmustard
       Date: July 15, 2025, 10:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Balgores Rd does not exist so deny the contravention on the
       ground that you were not there
       #Post#: 81168--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd /
       Balgores Rd RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: July 15, 2025, 3:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       (6) Subject to paragraph (8), an enforcement authority may not
       give a penalty charge notice under this regulation after the end
       of the period of 28 days beginning with the contravention date
       (“the 28-day period”).
       Date of contravention: 16 June
       Date of issue: Fri. 11 July
       Deemed date of service: Tue. 15 July
       Elapsed period: 30 days.
       Prima facie it's void for being served out of time. The burden
       is on the council to demonstrate that they may rely upon one of
       the exemptions.
       Paras. (7) and (8):
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2022/71/regulation/10
       #Post#: 81175--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd /
       Balgores Rd RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: mrmustard
       Date: July 15, 2025, 5:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The latest argument is the best one
       #Post#: 81241--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd /
       Balgores Rd RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: ynx
       Date: July 16, 2025, 6:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Many thanks everyone for your help.
       I will be making a representation based on the late service as
       kindly suggested by H C Andersen.
       --- Quote from: mrmustard link ---
       >
       > Balgores Rd does not exist so deny the contravention on the
       ground that you were not there
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       With regards to the location, I think they incorrectly refer to
       Balgores Ln as Balgores Rd, which does exist and is near the
       Station Rd in question (possibly to distinguish from other
       Station Roads in the borough). Is such a small error enough to
       deny the contravention? I remember seeing replies in other
       threads
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/approved-device-council-pcn-contravention-47j-stopped-on-restricted-bus-stop/msg81029/#msg81029<br
       />that this kind of typo may be allowed by an adjudicator.
       Considering the above, I'm wondering if it's worth tacking this
       on as a secondary reason in the representation, or simply going
       with the late service only. If so, should I mention explicitly
       that it does not exist, or simply deny ever being/stopping on
       it?
       Here's a draft of what I'm planning to send them:
       Dear Havering
       Ref: PCN                          VRM
       I make this formal representation against the said PCN:
       The PCN is unenforceable because it was served after the 28-day
       period had expired.
       Date of contravention: 16 June
       Date of issue: Fri. 11 July
       Deemed date of service: Tue. 15 July
       Elapsed period: 30 days.
       Additionally, I did not stop on any part of Balgores Rd at the
       time and date of the alleged contravention.
       Therefore, please cancel it forthwith.
       Yours faithfully
       Any advice is welcome, thanks!
       #Post#: 81247--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd /
       Balgores Rd RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 16, 2025, 7:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Putting 'Road' instead of 'Lane' is surely not just a typing
       error, it it ? I would include this in your reps.
       #Post#: 81755--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd /
       Balgores Rd RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: ynx
       Date: July 20, 2025, 5:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, I’ll be sending the above representation to Havering
       tomorrow, unless anyone has any other suggestions? Many thanks!
       #Post#: 81756--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd /
       Balgores Rd RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 20, 2025, 6:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Failure to maintain signage and where does it actually begin?
       Another fun one from Havering.
       #Post#: 81760--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Havering, code 47J stopped on bus stop, Station Rd /
       Balgores Rd RM2 (notice served late?)
   DIR By: ynx
       Date: July 20, 2025, 6:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks Hippocrates, I’ll look for other cases here with similar
       defects and try to come with a draft &#128077;
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page