DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 123708--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley, yellow box junction, High Street Bromley
(Sth)/Police Station
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: July 3, 2026, 1:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
So basically, the review process might as well not exist.
Is there any process to sack adjudicators that continue to make
basic errors of law ? Recently we've already seen an
adjudicator refuse an appeal re a Yellow Box Junction where the
vehicle had perforce to stop on the box to get the gate opened,
and not because there was a stationary vehicle in front of it,
(the YBJ NOT being at the junction of two or more roads, yet
another error). With adjudicators like this, London Tribunals
will soon be a laughing stock for the public, although the
councils will no doubt be enjoying the perverse decisions.
#Post#: 123713--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley, yellow box junction, High Street Bromley
(Sth)/Police Station
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: July 3, 2026, 4:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This has been known for years, it's saved hundreds of
Appellants, see Commercial Plant Services Ltd v Transport for
London (2230282004, 1 March 2024)
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZMSH2FLCFqwFerIEHyLZbTUCYj9bgeaJ/view.
It's generally much easier now to apply for a review than it was
prior to J Swift's judgment, however it has to be framed on
grounds other than an alleged error of law.
#Post#: 123717--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley, yellow box junction, High Street Bromley
(Sth)/Police Station
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: July 3, 2026, 5:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@cp8759
Grounds
1. Her statement at para. 8 is wrong because the section of the
Act cited refers to fixed penalty charge notices.
2. At para. 9 she has failed to apprehend/consider that the PCN
goes on to state, contrary to Schedule I of the 2003 Act, that
an authority cannot progress enforcement as per this statement
on its PCN: “If the penalty charge is not paid before the end of
the period of 28 days beginning with the date of the notice then
we may increase it by 50% to £240.00 and may take steps to
enforce recovery of the increased charge.”
In light of the above, I ask for a personal hearing please to
determine the matter.
I believe 2 above does not amount to an error of law.
I am really really concerned. No more to say.
#Post#: 123798--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bromley, yellow box junction, High Street Bromley
(Sth)/Police Station
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: July 5, 2026, 6:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
>
> So basically, the review process might as well not exist.
>
> Is there any process to sack adjudicators that continue to
make basic errors of law ? Recently we've already seen an
adjudicator refuse an appeal re a Yellow Box Junction where the
vehicle had perforce to stop on the box to get the gate opened,
and not because there was a stationary vehicle in front of it,
(the YBJ NOT being at the junction of two or more roads, yet
another error). With adjudicators like this, London Tribunals
will soon be a laughing stock for the public, although the
councils will no doubt be enjoying the perverse decisions.
>
--- End Quote ---
[member=12]Incandescent[/member]:
"Complaints@londoncouncils.gov.uk"
<complaints@londoncouncils.gov.uk>
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 3
DIR Previous Page