URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 80773--------------------------------------------------
       Haringey, code 02(a) temporary traffic order, Wroxham Gardens,
       parked while restructions in force
   DIR By: Milomix
       Date: July 13, 2025, 4:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I park my car on Wroxham Gardens in Haringey, which is a about a
       3-4 min walk from where I live because (i) there are no parking
       restrictions, (ii) there is always space, (iii) it's dead-end
       some no through traffic to damage car, and (iv) I rarely use my
       car, so it's a safe, convenient place to leave it.
       I parked there sometime 2 July (looking at when I last used
       ringo to park somewhere else) and hadn’t used it until yesterday
       12 July. When I collected it had been moved to the other side of
       the road - and there were two PCNs attached to it.
       Looking at the evidence online, there was a suspension of park
       on 7 and 8 July. In the evidence pictures there are clearly
       signs, I didn’t see them when I parked, but assume they were
       there (I think reversed into the spot, so missed the sign behind
       he car which would have been obscured by another car, then got
       out driver side and cut across the road towards the park path)
       I suspect there isn’t much grounds for appeal (Haringey have the
       ringo parking data so know I parked there on 2 July or later)
       for leaving the car there but would the second ticket be a
       continuous contravention  and worth appealing?
       Streeview:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/2vFornncVrARNGPVA
       PCNs:
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/ofaCwoj
       #Post#: 80833--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Haringey, code 02(a) temporary traffic order, Wroxham
       Gardens, parked while restructions in force
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 13, 2025, 2:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The problem is that you leave your car for long periods without
       checking on it and whether there are any parking suspensions. In
       this case, because there are no parking restrictions at all, the
       council have to make a Temporary Traffic Regulation Order, and
       put this up on the local lamp posts some days before the TTRO
       comes into effect. 7 days is regarded as normal.
       I suggest you submit reps on the first PCN that your car was
       parked legally when you parked it, therefore no contravention
       occurred. You note that the council moved your car to another
       part of the street and that is surely the only action they
       should have taken.
       You submit rep for the second PCN on the grounds that a PCN was
       served to the car on <date> and this one on <date. but the
       notice suspending the parking is over several days, therefore it
       was a continuing contravention therefore a single PCN suffices.
       #Post#: 80842--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Haringey, code 02(a) temporary traffic order, Wroxham
       Gardens, parked while restructions in force
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: July 13, 2025, 3:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That they didn't move the car on day 1 is IMO also a strong
       defence. In other words you shouldn't have available to you the
       argument that it was a continuous contravention because the car
       should have been moved on day 1! Why wait until after PCN 2 was
       issued before moving, after all the prohibition only lasted 2
       days.
       PCN 1, move the car, everyone's happy(ish)! Certainly happier
       than issue 2 PCNs then move.
       #Post#: 80869--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Haringey, code 02(a) temporary traffic order, Wroxham
       Gardens, parked while restructions in force
   DIR By: Milomix
       Date: July 14, 2025, 3:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you both, I'm going to to give that a go and will let you
       know how I get on. Very much appreciate the advice.
       #Post#: 80872--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Haringey, code 02(a) temporary traffic order, Wroxham
       Gardens, parked while restructions in force
   DIR By: mrmustard
       Date: July 14, 2025, 4:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I think that the problem in this case is with the traffic order.
       Haringey have enacted one which they think enables them to
       suspend parking in any road at any time for an 18 month period.
       Thus they create one order and only pay one fee to advertise it
       thus avoiding all those little weekly announcements you used to
       see in the local paper and all the fees. Motorists are therefore
       not on proper notice of upcoming works. I have never yet got as
       far as the tribunal with this argument.
       I am happy to write and submit all the challenges for the OP but
       have slightly changed the charity system. I still work pro bono
       (for free) but ask motorists to pay £40 directly to the North
       London Hospice before I start. I can be emailed on
       mrmustard@zoho.com
       I think both of these PCNs are beatable given the correct
       approach. I am well known in Haringey Parking.
       #Post#: 80991--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Haringey, code 02(a) temporary traffic order, Wroxham
       Gardens, parked while restructions in force
   DIR By: Milomix
       Date: July 14, 2025, 4:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: mrmustard link ---
       >
       > I think that the problem in this case is with the traffic
       order. Haringey have enacted one which they think enables them
       to suspend parking in any road at any time for an 18 month
       period. Thus they create one order and only pay one fee to
       advertise it thus avoiding all those little weekly announcements
       you used to see in the local paper and all the fees. Motorists
       are therefore not on proper notice of upcoming works. I have
       never yet got as far as the tribunal with this argument.
       >
       > I am happy to write and submit all the challenges for the OP
       but have slightly changed the charity system. I still work pro
       bono (for free) but ask motorists to pay £40 directly to the
       North London Hospice before I start. I can be emailed on
       mrmustard@zoho.com
       >
       > I think both of these PCNs are beatable given the correct
       approach. I am well known in Haringey Parking.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Okay, I'm up for this giving this a punt! I'll drop you an
       email.
       #Post#: 109409--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Haringey, code 02(a) temporary traffic order, Wroxham
       Gardens, parked while restructions in force
   DIR By: mrmustard
       Date: February 11, 2026, 2:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Quick update. Appeals were lodged at the tribunal on 12 October
       and yesterday Haringey Council 'Do not contested' them both and
       cancelled the PCNs accordingly. Persistence pays.
       #Post#: 109510--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Haringey, code 02(a) temporary traffic order, Wroxham
       Gardens, parked while restructions in force
   DIR By: Milomix
       Date: February 11, 2026, 1:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I just wanted to say a public thank you to Mr Mustard here. His
       advice and judgement throughout this protracted appeal have been
       absolutely spot on. Haringey ignore the facts of their own
       evidence and repeatedly made things up (and imaginary
       enforcement protocol, anyone?), it appears to scare me into
       paying. Mr Mustard was certain they would fold eventually and
       they did. It also meant I got make a small donation to the North
       London Hospice, which was pleasure and a million time more
       satisfying then paying Haringey’s speculative PCNs.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1