DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 96375--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 31, 2025, 4:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
>
HTML https://i.ibb.co/q39bqNPC/k7.jpg
>
HTML https://i.ibb.co/ksrFxd68/k6.jpg
>
HTML https://i.ibb.co/zHVbnH21/k5.jpg
>
HTML https://i.ibb.co/fdTB2HyR/k4.jpg
>
HTML https://i.ibb.co/BbvzZd3/k3.jpg
>
HTML https://i.ibb.co/99mNBnBs/k2.jpg
>
HTML https://i.ibb.co/TqTtMzJZ/k1.jpg
>
--- End Quote ---
Can't see. But [member=15]astralite[/member] has assisted me.
Thanks anyway.
#Post#: 96420--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 1, 2025, 6:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Dear Sir or Madam
Dear Sir or Madam
Please may I have responses to the following?:
1. The exact measurements of parking bays in The Bittoms as per
the attached photo.
2. The initial date the parking legends were placed.
3. The last time the parking legends were maintained at this
location.
4. The exact measurements of similar parking bays in nearby
streets as per the map.
5. Payment question: should a person pay and yet receive a PCN
for whatever reason throughout the whole borough, do you
reimburse? In particular, if the allegation is that they have
parked beyond the parking bay lines.
6. If so, is this automatic or do people have to apply?
7. If the answer to the second part of 5 is yes, why does not
the borough automatically refund the associated payments ?
8. Traffic Management Order: please provide this.
#Post#: 96442--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: November 1, 2025, 10:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The duty to consider fairly here is a factor. I'd take a pic of
the baby in its carrier on the pavement and ask the adjudicator
how they'd then repark the car assuming you even could see you
were out of the bay having avoided the post by the door. I guess
you'd put the baby by another door and start again but the space
is what it is at the time and markings only possibly visible
depending on other cars.
I'd also ask what signage alerts you to parking in bay markings.
Plus the other things.
#Post#: 96491--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: November 2, 2025, 2:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OP, you can ask questions as you wish. But this does not affect
the enforcement process whose timetables must be followed.
With respect to Hippocrates, I think a council would not deal
with this long list of items but instead IMO would be likely to
treat the request as falling under FoI and respond that the cost
to the authority of complying with this request exceeds the
threshold:
Currently, the cost limit for complying with a [FoI] request or
a linked series of requests from the same person or group is set
at £600 for central government, Parliament and the armed forces
and £450 for all other public authorities. You can refuse a
request if you estimate that the cost of compliance would exceed
this limit. This provision is found at section 12 of the Act.
HTML https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/foi/guide-to-managing-an-foi-request/charging-a-fee-and-cost-limits/
#Post#: 96501--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Vada_nevada
Date: November 2, 2025, 5:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
What is that you suggest needs to get done? I wanted to see what
are the consequences if Tribunal doesn’t cancel, how much would
I pay then and what are other negatives? Does this affect a
credit score if I lose?
#Post#: 96503--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: November 2, 2025, 5:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
If you lose you must pay £90 - that's it. If you don't pay they
can escalate to bailiffs but there's no impact on financial
status.
It's possible in this case you will lose but the adjudicator may
make a non-binding recommendation to Kingston to cancel.
It is also possible that Kingston won't contest it and you win
by default.
#Post#: 96505--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 2, 2025, 5:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Vada_nevada link ---
>
> Does this affect a credit score if I lose?
>
--- End Quote ---
NO. Stop worrying and trust that I will do my best for you. Now
I am involved, I am saying nothing more until the case is
decided.
#Post#: 96506--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 2, 2025, 5:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> The duty to consider fairly here is a factor. I'd take a pic
of the baby in its carrier on the pavement and ask the
adjudicator how they'd then repark the car assuming you even
could see you were out of the bay having avoided the post by the
door. I guess you'd put the baby by another door and start again
but the space is what it is at the time and markings only
possibly visible depending on other cars.
>
> I'd also ask what signage alerts you to parking in bay
markings.
>
> Plus the other things.
>
--- End Quote ---
All part of the game. ;D I tried to download the TMO yesterday
to no avail. I may do it the old-fashioned way and visit a
library!
#Post#: 97142--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 6, 2025, 3:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Going to the library tomorrow. Let's hope I don't get banned
from there too as it's just up the road from The Coronation
Hall.
#Post#: 97466--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 9, 2025, 7:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
TMO: The Kingston upon Thames (Parking, Waiting, Loading and
Stopping Restrictions) Order
PART III
SECTION 1 - General
Article 10.
*****************************************************
Page 7 of 8
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page