URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 96375--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: Hippocrates Date: October 31, 2025, 4:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=stamfordman link=topic=6902.msg96319#msg96319
       date=1761917661]
       [img width=640 height=480]
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/q39bqNPC/k7.jpg[/img]
       [img width=640 height=480]
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/ksrFxd68/k6.jpg[/img]
       [img width=640 height=480]
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/zHVbnH21/k5.jpg[/img]
       [img width=640 height=480]
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/fdTB2HyR/k4.jpg[/img]
       [img width=640 height=480]
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/BbvzZd3/k3.jpg[/img]
       [img width=640 height=480]
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/99mNBnBs/k2.jpg[/img]
       [img width=640 height=480]
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/TqTtMzJZ/k1.jpg[/img]
       [/quote]
       Can't see. But [member=15]astralite[/member] has assisted me.
       Thanks anyway.
       #Post#: 96420--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: Hippocrates Date: November 1, 2025, 6:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Dear Sir or Madam
       Dear Sir or Madam
       Please may I have responses to the following?:
       1. The exact measurements of parking bays in The Bittoms as per
       the attached photo.
       2. The initial date the parking legends were placed.
       3. The last time the parking legends were maintained at this
       location.
       4. The exact measurements of similar parking bays in nearby
       streets as per the map.
       5. Payment question: should a person pay and yet receive a PCN
       for whatever reason throughout the whole borough, do you
       reimburse? In particular, if the allegation is that they have
       parked beyond the parking bay lines.
       6. If so, is this automatic or do people have to apply?
       7. If the answer to the second part of  5 is yes, why does not
       the borough automatically refund the associated payments ?
       8. Traffic Management Order: please provide this.
       #Post#: 96442--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: stamfordman Date: November 1, 2025, 10:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The duty to consider fairly here is a factor. I'd take a pic of
       the baby in its carrier on the pavement and ask the adjudicator
       how they'd then repark the car assuming you even could see you
       were out of the bay having avoided the post by the door. I guess
       you'd put the baby by another door and start again but the space
       is what it is at the time and markings only possibly visible
       depending on other cars.
       I'd also ask what signage alerts you to parking in bay markings.
       Plus the other things.
       #Post#: 96491--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: H C Andersen Date: November 2, 2025, 2:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, you can ask questions as you wish. But this does not affect
       the enforcement process whose timetables must be followed.
       With respect to Hippocrates, I think a council would not deal
       with this long list of items but instead IMO would be likely to
       treat the request as falling under FoI and respond that the cost
       to the authority of complying with this request exceeds the
       threshold:
       Currently, the cost limit for complying with a [FoI] request or
       a linked series of requests from the same person or group is set
       at £600 for central government, Parliament and the armed forces
       and £450 for all other public authorities. You can refuse a
       request if you estimate that the cost of compliance would exceed
       this limit. This provision is found at section 12 of the Act.
  HTML https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/foi/guide-to-managing-an-foi-request/charging-a-fee-and-cost-limits/
       #Post#: 96501--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: Vada_nevada Date: November 2, 2025, 5:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What is that you suggest needs to get done? I wanted to see what
       are the consequences if Tribunal doesn’t cancel, how much would
       I pay then and what are other negatives? Does this affect a
       credit score if I lose?
       #Post#: 96503--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: stamfordman Date: November 2, 2025, 5:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you lose you must pay £90 - that's it. If you don't pay they
       can escalate to bailiffs but there's no impact on financial
       status.
       It's possible in this case you will lose but the adjudicator may
       make a non-binding recommendation to Kingston to cancel.
       It is also possible that Kingston won't contest it and you win
       by default.
       #Post#: 96505--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: Hippocrates Date: November 2, 2025, 5:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Vada_nevada link=topic=6902.msg96501#msg96501
       date=1762081791]
       Does this affect a credit score if I lose?
       [/quote]
       NO. Stop worrying and trust that I will do my best for you. Now
       I am involved, I am saying nothing more until the case is
       decided.
       #Post#: 96506--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: Hippocrates Date: November 2, 2025, 5:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=stamfordman link=topic=6902.msg96442#msg96442
       date=1762011970]
       The duty to consider fairly here is a factor. I'd take a pic of
       the baby in its carrier on the pavement and ask the adjudicator
       how they'd then repark the car assuming you even could see you
       were out of the bay having avoided the post by the door. I guess
       you'd put the baby by another door and start again but the space
       is what it is at the time and markings only possibly visible
       depending on other cars.
       I'd also ask what signage alerts you to parking in bay markings.
       Plus the other things.
       [/quote]
       All part of the game. ;D I tried to download the TMO yesterday
       to no avail. I may do it the old-fashioned way and visit a
       library!
       #Post#: 97142--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: Hippocrates Date: November 6, 2025, 3:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Going to the library tomorrow. Let's hope I don't get banned
       from there too as it's just up the road from The Coronation
       Hall.
       #Post#: 97466--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
       By: Hippocrates Date: November 9, 2025, 7:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       TMO: The Kingston upon Thames (Parking, Waiting, Loading and
       Stopping Restrictions) Order
       PART III
       SECTION 1 - General
       Article 10.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page