DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 94087--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: October 14, 2025, 1:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
An indecipherable employee working from home or employee of a
contractor? There's no reference to anyone other than the
council.
IMO, still require the info but modify the context i.e. the
signature is unreadable and does not state that they are working
on behalf of RBK but sign themselves as 'Authorised officer'.
You require evidence that whoever is duly authorised as required
by Regulation 6 etc.....
#Post#: 94106--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 14, 2025, 4:31 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Hill is head of Place and Gareth Campbell is head of
parking. APCOA is the contractor. Loch Ness monster spews out
the paperwork as in this case.
#Post#: 94112--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Vada_nevada
Date: October 14, 2025, 8:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you, all. I posted in a hurry as was leaving house. Please
could anyone explain what is the next step, is that
realistically achievable to get a cancellation? How far my fine
can go from that point if I continue to challenge?
#Post#: 94123--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: October 15, 2025, 3:21 am
---------------------------------------------------------
1. They have not re-offered the discount, therefore you're on
the hook for the full penalty.
2. You register your appeal. Simply follow the instructions and
register. You rely upon your formal representations and
procedural improprieties arising from the Notice of Rejection.
You do not need to go into detail at this stage.
The letter is signed by someone or something, it's
indecipherable. It says:
*******
Kingston Parking Services
Which means that they are employed by Kingston Parking Services,
not ***** on behalf of.
Not only are there issues regarding authorisation as regards
officers, this also applies from the Secretary of State's
Statutory Guidance:
The process of considering challenges, representations and
defence of appeals is a legal process that requires officers
dealing with these aspects to be trained in the relevant
legislation and how to apply it. They should be well versed in
the collection, interpretation and consideration of the
evidence, writing clear but concise case-specific responses to
challenges, enquiries and representations, presenting the
authority’s case to adjudicators.
Formal representations
Many enforcement authorities contract out on-street and car park
enforcement and the consideration of informal representations.
Enforcement authorities should not contract out the
consideration of formal representations. Enforcement authorities
remain responsible for the whole process, whether they contract
out part of it or not, and should ensure that a sufficient
number of suitably trained and authorised officers are available
to decide representations of their merits in a timely and
professional manner.
The authority’s standing orders should be specific as to which
officers have the authority to cancel penalty charge notices.
There should also be a clear audit trail of decisions taken with
reasons for those decisions
#Post#: 94135--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 15, 2025, 5:02 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Vada_nevada link ---
>
> Thank you, all. I posted in a hurry as was leaving house.
Please could anyone explain what is the next step, is that
realistically achievable to get a cancellation? How far my fine
can go from that point if I continue to challenge?
>
--- End Quote ---
I had already emailed you the next step. As HCA has now said
too. I'll assist when you are back.
#Post#: 96037--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Vada_nevada
Date: October 29, 2025, 7:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all, I am back home now. Please advise on how to appeal at
this stage. Thanks
#Post#: 96039--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 29, 2025, 8:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I'll email you my phone number now.
#Post#: 96193--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 30, 2025, 10:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I will file the appeal later today.
It's time councils pay back parking charges if people pay and
then get a ticket! I'll get this sorted too - globally.
#Post#: 96316--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 31, 2025, 8:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [quote author=Vada_nevada link=topic=6902.msg91562#msg91562
date=1758842592]
> Hi, thank you for the draft. Please could hippocrat look into
this as NTO was issued on 9 September? Can anyone tag him? Thank
you.
>
--- End Quote ---
Just got your e mail.
RBK's website is annoying as the photos appear for a split
second. NTO is OK. Go with stamfordman's draft.
[/quote]
I took a look yesterday. Can anyone post ALL the photos as their
site is still playing up?
#Post#: 96319--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: October 31, 2025, 8:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://i.ibb.co/q39bqNPC/k7.jpg
HTML https://i.ibb.co/ksrFxd68/k6.jpg
HTML https://i.ibb.co/zHVbnH21/k5.jpg
HTML https://i.ibb.co/fdTB2HyR/k4.jpg
HTML https://i.ibb.co/BbvzZd3/k3.jpg
HTML https://i.ibb.co/99mNBnBs/k2.jpg
HTML https://i.ibb.co/TqTtMzJZ/k1.jpg
*****************************************************
Page 6 of 8
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page