URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 91562--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: Vada_nevada
       Date: September 25, 2025, 6:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, thank you for the draft. Please could hippocrat look into
       this as NTO was issued on 9 September? Can anyone tag him? Thank
       you.
       #Post#: 91567--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: September 26, 2025, 12:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Vada_nevada link ---
       >
       > Hi, thank you for the draft. Please could hippocrat look into
       this as NTO was issued on 9 September? Can anyone tag him? Thank
       you.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Anyone can tag another menber in a post, but the tag option does
       not always work.
       You may also send a PM (Private Message) or e-mail to a member,
       using the relevant icon from those that appear at the end of a
       member's ID panel to the left of each post.
       #Post#: 91581--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: September 26, 2025, 3:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Vada_nevada link ---
       >
       > Hi, thank you for the draft. Please could hippocrat look into
       this as NTO was issued on 9 September? Can anyone tag him? Thank
       you.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Just got your e mail.
       RBK's website is annoying as the photos appear for a split
       second. NTO is OK. Go with stamfordman's draft.
       #Post#: 93982--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: Vada_nevada
       Date: October 14, 2025, 4:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good morning, I have just received another rejection and would
       like to post it, but imgur doesn’t seem to be available anymore.
       What else can I use instead?
       #Post#: 93989--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: October 14, 2025, 5:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have read the NOR. No brainer to go to the Tribunal as
       discount is not reoffered.
       #Post#: 93998--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: October 14, 2025, 6:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Vada_nevada link ---
       >
       > Good morning, I have just received another rejection and would
       like to post it, but imgur doesn’t seem to be available anymore.
       What else can I use instead?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       As Imgur is no longer available in the UK, you will need to use
       ibb.co
  HTML https://imgbb.com/
       or
  HTML https://imgpile.com/
       for posting images.
       Wherever possible, use the BBCode
       #Post#: 94036--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: October 14, 2025, 9:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Put the rejection on
  HTML https://imgbb.com
       
       #Post#: 94045--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: Vada_nevada
       Date: October 14, 2025, 9:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/u7D8uvE
       #Post#: 94048--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: October 14, 2025, 10:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is that it in its entirety?
       There's so much wrong and omitted I'm flabbergasted, although it
       is Kingston so maybe I shouldn't be.
       And the one which really gets me is that there is no such person
       as PARKING SERVICES authorised under the council's Officer
       Scheme of Delegation made under the council's Constitution to
       consider formal representations. So, would you pl write back to
       the Head of Parking Services and require them to inform you who
       considered and authorised the reply to your representations, an
       establishment post number would suffice if they want to maintain
       anonymity, and confirm, by including the relevant copy of the
       Officer Scheme of Delegation that this officer is authorised to
       act on behalf of the council to discharge the authority's duties
       as specified under Regulation 6 of The Civil Enforcement of Road
       Traffic Contraventions (Representations and Appeals) (England)
       Regulations 2022.
       Councils and authorities aren't tangible e.g. they cannot write
       letters etc. They must act through officers and those officers
       need to be authorised to act on behalf of the council in
       capacities specified by reference to legislation.
       #Post#: 94064--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly 
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: October 14, 2025, 11:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You've left your name and address on so have blanked them.
       They've ignored the practical details with the baby and really
       should fail on lack of duty to consider.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/3m1K1RCN/u7-D8uv-E-1.png
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/5hW8gnPF/u2m-PQe-L-xl.jpghttps://i.ibb.co/tMXWSCnB/u7-D8uv-E-2.png
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 8
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page