URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Non-motoring legal advice
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 77228--------------------------------------------------
       Littering 
       By: Danish Date: June 19, 2025, 2:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi there, so my brother had paid someone 50£ from Facebook
       market place to dumb some rubbish. Later after couple of weeks
       we had 4 fpn's on my name,my brother, my sister and our landlord
       of 500£ each from dartford council for littering rubbish on the
       sidwalk. Dartford is like 40 min away from us across the Thames.
       The rubbish had amazon letters on all of our names with the
       addresses on it and that's how the council has sent the letters
       on our names. I appealed it to the council but it's refused and
       now we all have given till 30th of this month to pay 500£ each.
       Could someone help if how to deal with this please
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 77397--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Littering 
       By: Sander333 Date: June 20, 2025, 10:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This appears to consider the case in the light of a third party
       to the offence. I don’t know whether the person that removed the
       waste had a waste carriers licence I think not otherwise you
       probably would have been provided with or requested a copy of
       the licence details. It looks on the face of it you have handed
       Jack the lad your money he/they have dumped the waste and inside
       are identifiable details not looking to good. However someone
       with greater knowledge may be able to assist in this arena.
       #Post#: 77405--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Littering 
       By: mickR Date: June 20, 2025, 11:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       this subject has been brought up before. I may be wrong (yes I
       know it would be unusual  :) )
       but iirc the crucial argument was that they have no evidence
       that you deposited the litter only that it could be your litter
       and that the offence is for depositing.
       I stand to be corrected by more learned members.
       #Post#: 77411--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Littering 
       By: 666 Date: June 20, 2025, 11:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=mickR link=topic=6893.msg77405#msg77405
       date=1750436658]
       this subject has been brought up before. I may be wrong (yes I
       know it would be unusual  :) )
       but iirc the crucial argument was that they have no evidence
       that you deposited the litter only that it could be your litter
       and that the offence is for depositing.
       I stand to be corrected by more learned members.
       [/quote]
       But the offence charged is not the depositing. It is "knowingly"
       causing or permitting the depositing.
       I'd imagine it would be difficult to prove that all four people
       knew, or even to establish which one (or more) of the four
       actually commissioned the disposal of the waste.
       #Post#: 77413--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Littering 
       By: PallasAthena Date: June 20, 2025, 11:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The letter you have posted contains your full name and address
       and the FPN number and I recommend you remove it and re-post
       with those details covered up.
       I'm not an expert on this but paying some bloke on Facebook £50
       to get rid your household rubbish was a criminal offence unless
       he had a Waste Carriers Licence and provided you with details of
       his Licence. Section 34 (2A) Environmental Protection Act 1990.
       I am guessing that he didn't show a Waste Carriers Licence
       because he didn't have one. Then - surprise, surprise - he just
       drove to somewhere he couldn't be seen and dumped it on a
       pavement, ie Flytipping. (Why didn't you just put it for
       collection by the council of the Borough you live in if it was
       just household waste?).
       The problem for you is that if you use an unlicensed waste
       carrier and they dump it somewhere illegally then the people
       that generated the rubbish - you and the people who lve in your
       household - may be legally liable for the flytipping. Flytipping
       is an offence under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and
       Dartford Council's Environmental Enforcement Policy says that
       the penalty notice they issue for flytipping is £500, which is
       what they have done.
       What did you say in your appeal against the Fixed Penalty
       Notice? Dartford Council appear to be saying that as there was
       evidence of waste originating from four people at the address
       each of you are guilty of flytipping so they have issued each of
       you with a Penalty Notice.  I would point you to section 5 (a)
       on page 18 of Dartford's Environmental Enforcement Policy which
       says:
       "Where waste comes from multiple individuals in the household,
       the ‘duty of care’ applies to the individual occupier of the
       property, who is arranging the transfer of household waste
       produced in/from that property. "
  HTML https://www.dartford.gov.uk/downloads/file/2243/environmental-enforcement-policy-november-2023
       That suggests to me that only the person who arranged for the
       bloke on Facebook to take the household's rubbish away (your
       brother) should have been given a penalty notice, not all four
       of you.  Unfortunately for you normally councils only give you
       one opportunity to make 'representations'/appeals and as you
       have already done this you are now probably beyond the point
       where the council will consider any further apppeals or
       representations from you. Did the appeal say it was being made
       on behalf of all four of you?
       So your options are for each of you to pay the £500 FPN you have
       received or any of you who fail to pay will be prosecuted in the
       Magistrates Court.
       Whether you would have a defence if prosecuted I cannot say.
       Others may be able to advise. It would be helpful if you could
       post here your appeal to Dartford council and their response
       (cover up your name and address, penalty notice number, and any
       identifying details) so that we can see what admissions you made
       in your appeal.
       #Post#: 77468--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Littering 
       By: 666 Date: June 21, 2025, 1:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=PallasAthena link=topic=6893.msg77413#msg77413
       date=1750438315]
       The letter you have posted contains your full name and address
       and the FPN number and I recommend you remove it and re-post
       with those details covered up.
       I'm not an expert on this but paying some bloke on Facebook £50
       to get rid your household rubbish was a criminal offence unless
       he had a Waste Carriers Licence and provided you with details of
       his Licence. Section 34 (2A) Environmental Protection Act 1990.
       I am guessing that he didn't show a Waste Carriers Licence
       because he didn't have one. Then - surprise, surprise - he just
       drove to somewhere he couldn't be seen and dumped it on a
       pavement, ie Flytipping. (Why didn't you just put it for
       collection by the council of the Borough you live in if it was
       just household waste?).
       [/quote]
       But ... the council haven't alleged a breach of section
       34(2(a)), but 33z. That requires each of the "accused" to have
       knowingly caused or permitted the illegal tipping.
       #Post#: 77480--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Littering 
       By: PallasAthena Date: June 21, 2025, 5:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=666 link=topic=6893.msg77468#msg77468
       date=1750487346]But ... the council haven't alleged a breach of
       section 34(2(a)), but 33z. That requires each of the "accused"
       to have knowingly caused or permitted the illegal
       tipping.[/quote]
       The reference to the use of an unlicensed waste carrier was for
       OP's information (as that offence may have been committed by the
       OP's brother). As I said it appears the FPNs have been issued
       for "flytipping", presumably the section 33 (1) (a) offence you
       refer to. However it isn't fully clear what the council's
       allegation is because the only document we've seen from the
       council refers to a "section 33z" offence but there is no
       section 33z in the Act. OP hasn't told us what he did or didn't
       know at the time the rubbish was disposed of.
       The OP may be able to get further advice here if he posts up
       redacted copies of
       -- His original FPN
       -- His appeal to the council
       -- Their response
       From the point of view of practical advice it seems the OP has
       made representations and they have been rejected so Dartford
       council may not permit any further representations to be made.
       In which case the OP is left with the options of paying the £500
       FPN or going to the Magistrates and pleading not guilty but it's
       not evident at this point what defence he would offer in court.
       *****************************************************