URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 76236--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: June 12, 2025, 10:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Be aware from that case that Camden may have improved the
       signage (with something in advance) but I can't see it makes a
       significant difference to what is there just beyond the junction
       now.
       When looking at tribunal cases you are mostly looking at alleged
       contraventions that took place often months ago.
       #Post#: 81339--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: bigred247
       Date: July 16, 2025, 3:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi folks,
       I receieved a NOR but have missed the 14 day discount to make an
       appeal. I don't see much in the NOR to lend further support for
       Camden's case. Any opinions and advice concerning this?
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/vZRzINI.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/S6R52vf.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/zzaVkYU.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/IjdGOOv.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/qahB9Ay.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/1AnapKn.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/86C2sJM.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/v7Ve5gJ.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/wznvLtz.jpeg
       #Post#: 81341--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: bigred247
       Date: July 16, 2025, 3:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I took some more pictures at the location a few weeks back. You
       can see the sign but only very late due to the traffic lights
       before the junction. The sign surely should be posted before you
       reach the junction. There must be many motorists that have been
       caught out by this.
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/f4hXsvE.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/pefFLv1.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/9ns9Enf.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/ase8w3D.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/Vg7OJpD.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/hqyiaEl.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/SbXz4k9.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/lSzsEml.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/MZXXtBi.jpeg
       #Post#: 81351--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 16, 2025, 5:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We've seen this location before, and the OP was successful on
       the grounds of inadequate signage, but it may have been enhanced
       since then.
       The traffic lights are a sign just like all other signs, and
       here are wrong, because the permanently displayed Left Turn
       arrow is a mandatory instruction, yet the Buses Only sign beyond
       it is day and time restricted, so the signage here is a complete
       mess, frankly. There should be an advance sign with a geographic
       map of the junction showing the restriction ahead and its
       applicabble days and times, and the traffic lights should be
       changed to reflect the Buses Only days and times.
       Of course if you decide to register an appeal at London
       Tribunals, it will be with the full PCN penalty in play, so
       clearly it is your decision and a win is not guranteed the same
       as in any other court of law, but I'd say your case is
       reasonably strong.  You could try searching the London Tribunals
       Statutory Register for the location on the PCN to see if there
       are any previous cases here and what the result was.
       #Post#: 81483--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: bigred247
       Date: July 17, 2025, 11:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=12]Incandescent[/member]
       I've missed the 14 day discount period as I've been back and
       forth to hospital for my sons treatment. So at this point I
       don't think there is any thing to lose?
       Thank you for your advice about checking the register (i didn't
       know even know it existed and that it was publicly available).
       As a result, I managed to find a 3rd case where the appeal was
       allowed by the same adjudicator in similar circumstances. I have
       posted brief details below:
       --- Quote ---
       >
       > Case reference 2250057339
       > Oded Kanzen v London Borough of Camden
       >
       > Adjudicator Sean Stanton-Dunne
       >
       > “In my judgement, the motorist travelling along Tottenham
       Court Road will not see the restricted route sign with its
       controlled hours until it is too late to safely avoid using the
       route. There is a blue sign at the traffic lights with a
       directional arrow directing traffic to turn to the left but the
       PCN was not issued for the alleged contravention of failing to
       drive in the direction shown by the arrow on a blue sign. The
       blue sign directional arrow is also misleading as the restricted
       route beyond the lights can be used outside of controlled
       hours.”
       --- End Quote ---
       So I now have 3 supporting cases which i can mention in my
       appeal.
       Michael Curland v. Camden (Case 2250121019, decided 11 June
       2025)
       Khan v. Camden (Case 2240583109, decided 25 March 2025)
       Oded Kanzen v Camden (Case 2250057339, decided 08 Apr 2025)
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/7DRDYBh.png
       Any thoughts?
       #Post#: 81485--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: bigred247
       Date: July 17, 2025, 11:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Any feedback on the appeal template below?
       [quote]
       I respectfully appeal against the above PCN on the grounds that
       the alleged contravention did not occur due to inadequate and
       misleading signage at the location, as has already been
       confirmed by this tribunal in three previous decisions involving
       the same road layout and signs.
       1. Inadequate Signage at Tottenham Court Road / Howland Street
       The signage is placed after the junction, adjacent to a
       pedestrian crossing. There is no advance warning, and the blue
       directional arrow at the traffic lights misleads drivers into
       believing they must turn left, when in fact the straight-ahead
       route is only restricted during certain hours. This confusing
       setup caused the alleged contravention.
       2. Consistent Tribunal Findings – Three Precedents
       The following appeal decisions have all found the signage at
       this exact location to be non-compliant:
       Khan v Camden (Case 2240583109, 25 March 2025)
       Adjudicator Sean Stanton-Dunne allowed the appeal, stating:
       “The motorist... will not see the restricted route sign until it
       is too late... The blue sign directional arrow is also
       misleading...”
       Curland v Camden (Case 2250121019, 11 June 2025)
       The same adjudicator again ruled the signage inadequate. After
       an adjournment to allow the Council to supply evidence of
       advance signage, Camden withdrew the case and the appeal was
       allowed.
       Kanzen v Camden (Case 2250057339)
       Once more, Adjudicator Stanton-Dunne confirmed:
       “The motorist... will not see the restricted route sign... until
       it is too late... The blue sign directional arrow is also
       misleading...”
       These repeated findings demonstrate that the signage at this
       junction fails to comply with statutory requirements and creates
       avoidable confusion for motorists, resulting in repeated
       wrongful enforcement.
       3. Additional Personal Context
       My wife was driving to collect our son from the UCH Macmillan
       Cancer Centre, where he was receiving cancer treatment. Due to
       his limited mobility and treatment side effects, driving was the
       only viable option. The road layout and misleading signage made
       it impossible to comply despite best efforts.
       4. Conclusion
       In light of:
       - Three previous appeal decisions confirming the signage is
       inadequate,
       - Camden’s failure to remedy or update the signs,
       - The misleading blue arrow and absence of proper advance
       warning,
       - And the essential nature of the journey,
       I respectfully ask that this appeal be allowed and the PCN
       cancelled.
       #Post#: 81500--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 17, 2025, 1:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You need to emphasise the signs cock-up in that the traffic
       signals have a mandatory Turn Left arrow, but the PCN was not
       issued for this, indicating it is now obsolete, but has not been
       removed. The PCN was for passing the Buses Only sign which is
       subject to a days and hours restriction on its applicability.
       Therefore in view of the incorrect signs, and the lack of any
       advance warning you request that the PCN be cancelled and cite
       the cases you have listed.
       #Post#: 81926--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: bigred247
       Date: July 21, 2025, 8:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=12]Incandescent[/member]
       Does this capture it? I have made a reference to the left arrow.
       --- Quote ---
       >
       > I respectfully appeal the above PCN on the basis that the
       alleged contravention did not occur due to inadequate,
       misleading, and contradictory signage, as confirmed in three
       previous decisions by this Tribunal at the exact same location.
       >
       > 1. Signage Defects – Inconsistent and Misleading
       > The alleged contravention occurred at Tottenham Court Road,
       just after the junction with Howland Street. The signage at this
       location is fundamentally flawed:
       >
       > - The "Buses and Cycles Only" restriction sign, which is
       time-limited, is placed after the junction, giving no adequate
       advance warning.
       > - The blue directional arrow at the traffic lights is a
       mandatory "Turn Left" sign, but the PCN was not issued for
       failing to comply with it.
       > - This means Camden is enforcing a restriction that directly
       contradicts another regulatory sign at the same junction,
       creating confusion and uncertainty for motorists.
       >
       > The presence of an obsolete or misleading Turn Left sign—still
       treated as legally binding by its design—renders the signage
       layout contradictory and unlawful. The Council’s own CCTV
       footage fails to show any advance signage warning drivers of the
       time-limited restriction straight ahead.
       >
       > 2. Tribunal Precedent – Three Cases Confirm Inadequate Signage
       > Three appeals have already been allowed at this same location,
       all heard by Adjudicator Sean Stanton-Dunne:
       >
       > >> Khan v Camden (Case 2240583109, 25 March 2025)
       > [quote]“In my judgement, the motorist travelling along
       Tottenham Court Road will not see the restricted route sign
       until it is too late to safely avoid using the route. The
       motorist will, of course, see the blue sign at the traffic
       lights with the directional arrow directing traffic to turn to
       the left but the PCN was not issued for the alleged
       contravention of failing to drive in the direction shown by the
       arrow on a blue sign. The blue sign directional arrow is also
       misleading as the restricted route beyond the lights can be used
       outside of controlled hours.”
       --- End Quote ---
       >> Curland v Camden (Case 2250121019, 11 June 2025)
       After a hearing was adjourned for Camden to produce evidence of
       advance signage, the Council withdrew, and the adjudicator
       allowed the appeal.
       >> Kanzen v Camden (Case 2250057339, 08 Apr 2025)
       Again, the adjudicator confirmed:
       --- Quote ---
       > “In my judgement, the motorist travelling along Tottenham
       Court Road will not see the restricted route sign with its
       controlled hours until it is too late to safely avoid using the
       route. There is a blue sign at the traffic lights with a
       directional arrow directing traffic to turn to the left but the
       PCN was not issued for the alleged contravention of failing to
       drive in the direction shown by the arrow on a blue sign. The
       blue sign directional arrow is also misleading as the restricted
       route beyond the lights can be used outside of controlled
       hours.”
       --- End Quote ---
       These repeated findings show that Camden has failed to remedy
       unlawful signage at this location, and continues to issue PCNs
       under conditions that do not meet the legal standard for
       enforceability.
       3. Personal Context – Exceptional Circumstances
       On this occasion, my wife was driving to collect our son from
       the UCH Macmillan Cancer Centre, where he was receiving
       treatment for cancer. His medical condition and limited mobility
       made public transport unviable. The poor signage and conflicting
       directions made compliance unintentionally impossible.
       4. Conclusion – Appeal Should Be Allowed
       In light of:
       - The contradictory signage, with a still-visible mandatory Turn
       Left arrow not enforced,
       - The absence of any advance warning of the time-limited
       restriction,
       - Three Tribunal decisions confirming the signage is
       non-compliant,
       - Camden’s ongoing failure to correct the layout,
       - And the essential medical nature of the journey,
       I respectfully request that this appeal be allowed and the PCN
       cancelled.
       [/quote]
       #Post#: 82060--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: bigred247
       Date: July 22, 2025, 3:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Any thoughts?
       #Post#: 82071--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Camden - using a route restricted to certain vehicles
       local buses and cycles only
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: July 22, 2025, 4:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you are appealing to the tribunal you don't need to include
       anything until you see their evidence pack should they contest.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page