DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 106161--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: jfollows Date: January 16, 2026, 6:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Google Drive is often used, ensure that the settings are correct
and post a link here. Dropbox and other things also possible.
#Post#: 106162--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: IAN28221 Date: January 16, 2026, 6:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Please see the link attached
HTML https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:ddcc35c1-1f7b-4a0d-b70c-7b580e21f9de
#Post#: 106172--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: DWMB2 Date: January 16, 2026, 7:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
What time was this received?
I note it is dated with today's date - this would seem to mean
they have also only sent it to the court today. When you have
the opportunity I would point out to the judge that the witness
statement is dated today, that you received it less than ___
hours before the hearing, and that you are of the view that it
is further unreasonable conduct of them to send a 54 page bundle
on the day of the hearing, essentially ambushing you with
evidence you have had no reasonable opportunity to consider and
prepare a response to.
They've had since 10th December to respond to this.
#Post#: 106176--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: InterCity125 Date: January 16, 2026, 8:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
On the face if it John Moody's assertion that the case was
struck out 'purely because he signed the documents' appears
incorrect - the Judge also commented on their failure to follow
CPR in his strike out commentary. He also comments on Moorside's
serial behaviour in that respect.
This needs to be drawn to the Judge's attention at the hearing.
#Post#: 106179--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: IAN28221 Date: January 16, 2026, 8:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
this was received at 12.14 for a 3pm hearing and they state in
their email to the court
We act for the Claimant in the above matter.
By way of filing, please find attached the Claimant's Witness
Statement.
We confirm the same has been served on the Defendant by way of
service.
Notice of non-attendance
Please accept this email as the Claimant’s notice of
non-attendance. We kindly request that the Court consider the
said Witness Statement in lieu of attendance. We could not send
the Witness Statement earlier due to internal technical issues
suffered in document production.
#Post#: 106180--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: InterCity125 Date: January 16, 2026, 8:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Our only computer has been broken since 10th December.
Miraculously it started working again today at 12.14pm."
::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
#Post#: 106181--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: IAN28221 Date: January 16, 2026, 8:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
exactly. THye did not respond to any of my emails before
#Post#: 106182--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: InterCity125 Date: January 16, 2026, 8:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
When combined with non-attendance, the WS is nothing but second
/ third hand hearsay evidence - you can point that out.
#Post#: 106183--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: InterCity125 Date: January 16, 2026, 8:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Plus, "I had a number of questions for their representative and
their non-attendance puts me at a disadvantage."
#Post#: 106184--------------------------------------------------
Re: Letter of Claim from Moorside Legal
By: DWMB2 Date: January 16, 2026, 8:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
If there is a legitimate explanation as to why 'technical
issues' have made it impossible to file a witness statement for
a hearing they have been aware of since 10th December until 3
hours before the hearing, then it is an explanation beyond my
comprehension. They could have got around any such issue (if one
existed) by attending the hearing...
I think your primary point on the WS is as I noted above, that
serving one so late is on its own unreasonable, then if you need
it, you can draw attention to the fact you disagree with some of
its contents, as Intercity rightly notes.
Good luck - have all these arguments ready to go - depending on
the judge, you might not have to say much (particularly if it's
the same one that struck out their claim in the first place).
Let us know how you get on.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page