URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 75244--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: victorious007
       Date: June 7, 2025, 10:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Collateral challenge
       >
       > A PCN issued under the 2003 act cannot possibly act as Notice
       to Owner.
       > Furthermore, there is a whole passage on the PCN/Notice to
       Owner (sic) which
       > contains information concerning the 56 days period in which to
       respond which clearly
       > is taken from parking law. So, it follows that this hybrid
       document should also
       > contain grounds which belong to parking legislation. This
       non-statutory conflation
       > plays fast and loose with the legislation(s). Any person with
       no such knowledge
       > would be sent on a wild goose chase researching “Notice to
       Owner” etc. I believe this
       > is the only London council which uses such confusing
       nomenclature.
       >
       > Warning signage
       >
       > This is inadequate. In other parts of the borough, two signs
       are erected on both sides of the road. Further the contents are
       meaningless.
       >
       > Website
       >
       > The amount outstanding on this PCN is £80.00 and will increase
       to £160.00 on Tue, 10 Jun 2025. However, this PCN currently has
       a discount, meaning you can pay at a reduced rate of £80.00.
       This discount expires on Tue, 10 Jun 2025
       >
       > The date is wrong. 14 days from date of PCN.
       >
       > I will draft later.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Hi [member=24]Hippocrates[/member], just realised this pcn will
       increase in 3 days. would appreciate a draft so i dont miss
       that. kind regards
       #Post#: 75272--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: June 7, 2025, 1:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just send it.
       #Post#: 75280--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: victorious007
       Date: June 7, 2025, 1:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Just send it.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] ,  sorry what should I send. the
       text u wrote above?
       is that the actual draft or should i just send that. dont want
       to get it wrong
       #Post#: 75332--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: June 8, 2025, 4:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Put this into a pdf and choose ground: penalty exceeded amount
       applicable and contravention did not occur.
       Collateral challenge
       A PCN issued under the 2003 act cannot possibly act as Notice to
       Owner.
       Furthermore, there is a whole passage on the PCN/Notice to Owner
       (sic) which
       contains information concerning the 56 days period in which to
       respond which clearly
       is taken from parking law. So, it follows that this hybrid
       document should also
       contain grounds which belong to parking legislation. This
       non-statutory conflation
       plays fast and loose with the legislation(s). Any person with no
       such knowledge
       would be sent on a wild goose chase researching “Notice to
       Owner” etc. I believe this
       is the only London council which uses such confusing
       nomenclature.
       Warning signage
       This is inadequate. In other parts of the borough, two signs are
       erected on both sides of the road. Further the contents are
       meaningless.
       Website
       Referring to this screenshot:
       The amount outstanding on this PCN is £80.00 and will increase
       to £160.00 on Tue, 10 Jun 2025. However, this PCN currently has
       a discount, meaning you can pay at a reduced rate of £80.00.
       This discount expires on Tue, 10 Jun 2025.
       This information is incorrect and your website has been found
       very recently to be wanting.
       Considering the above, please cancel the PCN.
       #Post#: 82345--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: victorious007
       Date: July 23, 2025, 9:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member]   or anyone else happy to help.
       I just received a REJECTION Letter.
       NOR link:
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/response-lewisham-52m-first-page-scroll-to-bottom-1OK4MO9
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/response-lewisham-52m-first-page-scroll-to-bottom-1OK4MO9
       or try this in case doesnt work:
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/response-lewisham-52m-first-page-scroll-to-bottom-1OK4MO9
       #Post#: 82353--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: July 23, 2025, 10:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For convenience (it would help if you could post the 2nd page
       the right way up!)
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/OyakUZ8.jpeg
       #Post#: 82405--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 23, 2025, 3:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well, the silly t(w)its have sent the wrong form for a start and
       have dodged the issues about their website. I say Tribunal time.
       #Post#: 82541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: victorious007
       Date: July 24, 2025, 11:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] , haha glad you caught onto
       that.
       What will be the next steps Re Tribunals? never done that before
       heres the link to the second page the right way up:
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/cOIR2dw
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/cOIR2dw
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/AZJmXRQ.jpeg
       #Post#: 82632--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 25, 2025, 5:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'll PM you.
       #Post#: 83858--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lewisham Borough, code 52m failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Dermody Road.
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: August 3, 2025, 2:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I say go for it as per my e mail.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page