DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 71645--------------------------------------------------
Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: Leew914
Date: May 15, 2025, 8:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all,
Glad to hear the community is still strong after losing access
to the old site.
I am the appointed go to person in our business when parking
charges turn up from the company cars and have just received
notice of an alleged non payment.
The car is registered to the business with no name attached, the
driver was seen by camera for a stay without payment on 18/4.
The NTK shows the issue date as 07/05 but was only delivered
today.
Date of offence and date of issue is outside of 14 days.
Will this be enough on its own to dispute?
If so, is there any suitable response I can send back to them?
Issuer is GroupNexus(CP Plus.
I can upload NTK tomorrow if it helps?
Thanks.
#Post#: 71648--------------------------------------------------
Re: Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: May 15, 2025, 8:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Leew914 link ---
>
> Will this be enough on its own to dispute?
>
--- End Quote ---
As a minor point of clarity, it's not an offence.
To be clear - the company you're representing is the registered
keeper of the vehicle, with the V5C in their possession? If so,
then yes, the notice being delivered outside the 14 day period
should be sufficient.
I've included below the usual template for companies, assuming
the notice doesn't wrongly claim to be able to hold the company
liable under PoFA. Although if you could upload the NtK before
submitting anything, that'd be preferable, as I personally don't
like offering advice on a notice I haven't seen.
[indent]Dear Sirs,
We have received your Parking Charge Notice (Ref: ________) for
vehicle registration mark ____ ___, in which you allege that the
driver has incurred a parking charge. We note from your
correspondence that you are not seeking to hold us liable as the
registered keeper, under Schedule 4 of the Protection of
Freedoms Act 2012 ("The Act"). You have chosen not to issue a
Notice to Keeper in accordance with The Act, and it is now too
late for you to do so.
As a body corporate, we cannot be the driver. There is no
obligation for us to name the driver and we will not be doing
so. We are therefore unable to help you further with this
matter, and look forward to your confirmation that the charge
has been cancelled. If you choose to decline this appeal, you
must issue a POPLA code.
Yours,
[COMPANY NAME][/indent]
#Post#: 71666--------------------------------------------------
Re: Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: Leew914
Date: May 15, 2025, 10:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the swift response!
Yes the company is the registered keeper and holds the V5.
Copy of PCN attached
[attachment deleted by admin]
#Post#: 71672--------------------------------------------------
Re: Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: May 15, 2025, 10:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks - the appeal I suggested above should be appropriate.
#Post#: 71675--------------------------------------------------
Re: Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: Leew914
Date: May 15, 2025, 10:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Would I not still need to state that the 14 days had passed?
#Post#: 71676--------------------------------------------------
Re: Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: May 15, 2025, 11:01 am
---------------------------------------------------------
They know (or should know) it was issued too late for it to be
delivered within 14 days, they're the ones who issued it
#Post#: 71704--------------------------------------------------
Re: Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: b789
Date: May 15, 2025, 1:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The location is not relevant land. Another arrow in the quiver.
There is no such address as Wyre Forest DY14 9QX. In fact there
is no such post code that ends with 9QX. If the location is
"Wyre Forest", then that is land under statutory control of
Forestry England.
#Post#: 71711--------------------------------------------------
Re: Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: May 15, 2025, 1:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Cheers b789, useful to know if we need to chuck it in for POPLA.
#Post#: 71743--------------------------------------------------
Re: Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: Leew914
Date: May 15, 2025, 3:31 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks. I'll let you know how it goes get on.
And it was forestry land that was visited.
#Post#: 71759--------------------------------------------------
Re: Beyond 14 days notice
DIR By: coffee pot
Date: May 15, 2025, 5:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It's DY14 9XQ, which does exist and is adjacent to the A456 Long
Bank. However, if it's Wyre car park, that is in a different
post code, DY14 9XH. The NtK doesn't appear to specify exactly
where the vehicle was allegedly parked.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page