URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 73618--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: PurpleLackey
       Date: May 28, 2025, 10:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PurpleLackey link ---
       >
       > [quote author=b789 link=topic=6314.msg73615#msg73615
       date=1748445492]
       > Show us the NtH, both sides.
       >
       > Did it include copies of these document?
       >
       > [indent]• a statement signed by or on behalf of the
       vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the
       vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement;
       >
       > • a copy of the hire agreement;
       >
       > • a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under
       that hire agreement; and
       >
       > • a copy of the original Notice to Keeper (NtK)[/indent]
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       As requested,
       Thank you
       [/quote]
       This is all that was received in the post
       #Post#: 73626--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: b789
       Date: May 28, 2025, 11:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Doesn't really matter. The NtH is not relying on PoFA and
       clearly states that they are only pursuing the driver. As the
       Hirer is under no legal obligation to identify the driver, all
       the POPLA appeal needs to show is that PoFA is not invoked.
       For the POPLA appeal simply state that the operator is not
       relying on the provisions of PoFA to hold the Hirer liable and
       the appellant declines to identify the drover, as is their
       lawful right. The operator has provided no evidence to show that
       the person they are pursuing is thew driver.
       I would really keep it as simple as that:
       --- Quote ---
       > I am the Hirer of the vehicle. The Notice to Hirer does not
       invoke the provisions of Schedule 4 of the Protection of
       Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) and expressly states that the operator
       is pursuing the driver only.
       >
       > The final paragraph of the Notice to Hirer confirms this
       position:
       >
       > [indent]"You are advised that if, after the period of 21 days
       beginning with the day after that on which this notice is given
       – the amount of the unpaid parking charge specified in this
       notice has not been paid in full, we will have the right to
       recover the parking charge amount that remains unpaid from the
       driver of the vehicle."[/indent]
       >
       > I decline to identify the driver, as is my lawful right. The
       operator has provided no evidence that I was the driver and
       therefore has no lawful basis to pursue me as the Hirer.
       >
       > There can be no inference or presumption that the Hirer/Keeper
       is the driver, as confirmed by persuasive case law in VCS v
       Edward (2023) [HOKF6C9C].
       >
       > The appeal must therefore be allowed.
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 80653--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: PurpleLackey
       Date: July 11, 2025, 11:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       Ive had the appeal rejected with the attached email.
       Hoping for further advice
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 80662--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: ixxy
       Date: July 12, 2025, 2:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You have 2 choices, pay the outstanding invoice, the driver did
       breach the carpark rules, or ignore it.
       It is in the hands of the parking company now. You will probably
       get loads of letters from debt collectors which can be ignored.
       If / when you get a letter of claim come back here for more
       advice.
       #Post#: 80666--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: mickR
       Date: July 12, 2025, 4:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       why would you suggest the OP pays????
       #Post#: 80669--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: July 12, 2025, 4:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PurpleLackey link ---
       >
       > Hi,
       >
       > Ive had the appeal rejected with the attached email.
       >
       > Hoping for further advice
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Dated 13 June.
       What happened since then?
       #Post#: 80673--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: ixxy
       Date: July 12, 2025, 4:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: mickR link ---
       >
       > why would you suggest the OP pays????
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Because that is one of the options open to the poster, not
       everyone wants the stress of being bombarded with debt
       collectors letters and the complexities of defending a claim
       even if the end result is it will get discontinued. The forum is
       to provide advice and information so people can make the right
       decisions for them based on solid facts rather than the hysteria
       usually found on other forums.
       #Post#: 80676--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: mickR
       Date: July 12, 2025, 5:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is a fightback forum giving advise to people who want to
       challenge PCNs.
       the advice given here is, and always has been, based on the
       facts of the individual case. Posters will be advised of what to
       expect when challenging in some detail. In the event of a lost
       cause they will be advise to cough up but only if its the only
       reasonable course of action. suggesting people pay up when the
       advice given (by very experienced members @b789 and DWMB2) is to
       challenge, is counter productive to helping the OP and the wider
       cause.
       #Post#: 80681--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: RichardW
       Date: July 12, 2025, 5:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That's the rejection from the parking co. The POPLA code should
       still be live for a couple more days, and you can submit an
       appeal to them.
       #Post#: 80682--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Help with ticket
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: July 12, 2025, 5:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: RichardW link ---
       >
       > That's the rejection from the parking co. The POPLA code
       should still be live for a couple more days, and you can submit
       an appeal to them.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Exactly, and the suggested POPLA appeal is in Reply #11 above.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page