URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 70548--------------------------------------------------
       Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: insatiable
       Date: May 8, 2025, 9:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Received this penalty notice. I thought I had paid the massive
       £1 to park - clearly I didn't. So now they want £60 for 20
       minutes :(
       I note they have mentioned the PoFA 2012 element. Is there
       anything I can do here?
       Images attached.
       Thanks for any help!
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 70549--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: May 8, 2025, 9:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       They might refer to the Protection of Freedoms Act, but they've
       not complied with it! One of the requirements is to deliver a
       notice within 14 days. They sent theirs on day 14, and it is
       presumed delivered 2 working days later, too late to hold the
       keeper liable!
       Are you the registered keeper of the vehicle? If so, appeal
       online as the keeper only (choosing 'other' under reason for
       appeal) with the below:
       [indent]Dear Sirs,
       I have received your Parking Charge Notice (Ref: ________) for
       vehicle registration mark ____ ___, in which you allege that the
       driver has incurred a parking charge.  I note from your
       correspondence that you claim to be able to hold me liable under
       Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 ("The Act"),
       but this is not true. You have failed to deliver the notice
       within the relevant period of 14 days as required by paragraph
       9(4) of the Act.
       Date of parking: 14/04/25
       Date of issue: 28/04/25
       Date of presumed service under 9(6) of the Act: 30/04/25
       Days elapsed: 16 days
       I am appealing as the registered keeper. There is no obligation
       for me to name the driver and I will not be doing so. I am
       therefore unable to help you further with this matter, and look
       forward to your confirmation that the charge has been cancelled.
       If you choose to decline this appeal, you must issue a POPLA
       code.
       Yours,
       [/indent]
       If appealing online, be careful there are no drop down/tick
       boxes that cause you to identify who was driving, and keep a
       close eye on your spam folder for their response. If they do not
       respond within 28 days, chase them.
       #Post#: 70552--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: May 8, 2025, 9:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Smart will reject the appeal “after careful consideration” or
       similar guff, and state incorrectly that they comply with PoFA
       2012 by posting the notice within 14 days, but will supply a
       POPLA code with which the notice will eventually be cancelled.
       Smart are either stupid, or tell fibs, or both, in order to
       maximise their chances of getting hold of your money.
       Stay the course and you’ll pay £0.
       #Post#: 70558--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: May 8, 2025, 9:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Their misrepresentation is grounds for complaint - you could
       complain now, but my personal recommendation would be to wait
       for them to respond to your appeal. I'll explain my reasoning -
       when they respond, they are likely to reject your appeal, as
       jfollows says above, citing their false claim that the notice
       must be 'issued' within 14 days, which is not true.
       This doubling down by them rules out the possibility of the
       inclusion of the PoFA wording on the PCN being a simple honest
       mistake, and exposes them as deliberately misrepresenting their
       position, strengthening your complaint.
       #Post#: 70594--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: b789
       Date: May 8, 2025, 3:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Use the following template to make a formal complaint to the
       DVLA about the fact that they have issued an NtK that breaches
       the PPSCoP section 8.1.1(d) and therefore the KADOE contract:
       --- Quote ---
       > Here’s how to make a DVLA complaint:
       >
       > [indent]• Go to:
  HTML https://contact.dvla.gov.uk/complaints
       > • Select: “Making a complaint or compliment about the Vehicles
       service you have received”
       > • Enter your personal details, contact details, and vehicle
       details
       > • Use the text box to summarise your complaint or insert a
       covering note
       > • You will then be able to upload a file (up to 19.5 MB) —
       this can be your full complaint or supporting evidence
       > That’s it.[/indent]
       >
       > The DVLA is required to record, investigate and respond to
       every complaint about a private parking company. If everyone who
       encounters a breach took the time to submit a complaint, we
       might finally see the DVLA take meaningful action—whether that
       means curtailing or removing KADOE access altogether.
       >
       > For the text part of the complaint the webform could use the
       following:
       >
       > [quote]I am submitting a formal complaint against [INSERT PPC
       NAME], an [INSERT IPC or BPA] AOS member with DVLA KADOE access,
       for breaching the BPA/IPC Private Parking Single Code of
       Practice (PPSCoP) after obtaining my personal data.
       >
       > While the Operator may have had reasonable cause at the time
       of their KADOE request, their subsequent misuse of my
       data—through conduct that contravenes the PPSCoP—renders that
       use unlawful. The PPSCoP forms an integral part of the DVLA’s
       governance framework for data access by private parking firms.
       Continued access is conditional on compliance.
       >
       > The DVLA, as data controller, is obliged under UK GDPR and the
       Data Protection Act 2018 to investigate and take enforcement
       action when data is misused following release. This complaint is
       not about whether the data was obtained lawfully at the outset,
       but whether its subsequent use breached the terms under which it
       was provided.
       >
       > I have prepared a supporting statement setting out the nature
       of the breach and the Operator’s actions, and I request a full
       investigation into this matter. I have attached the supporting
       document.
       >
       > Please acknowledge receipt and confirm the reference number
       for this complaint.
       --- End Quote ---
       Then you could upload the following as a PDF file for the formal
       complaint itself:
       --- Quote ---
       > SUPPORTING STATEMENT
       >
       > Complaint to DVLA – Breach of KADOE Contract and PPSCoP
       >
       > Operator name: [INSERT PPC NAME]
       > Date of PCN issue: [INSERT DATE]
       > Vehicle registration: [INSERT VRM]
       >
       > I am submitting this complaint to report a misuse of my
       personal data by [INSERT PPC NAME], who obtained my keeper
       details from the DVLA under the KADOE (Keeper At Date Of Event)
       contract.
       >
       > Although the parking company may have had reasonable cause to
       request my data initially, the way they have used that data
       afterwards amounts to unlawful processing. This is because they
       have acted in breach of the BPA/IPC Private Parking Single Code
       of Practice (PPSCoP), which is a mandatory requirement for
       access to DVLA keeper data. The PPSCoP forms part of the
       framework that regulates how parking companies must behave once
       they have received keeper data from the DVLA.
       >
       > The KADOE contract makes clear that keeper data may only be
       used to pursue an unpaid parking charge in line with the Code of
       Practice. If a parking company fails to comply with the PPSCoP
       after receiving DVLA data, their use of that data becomes
       unlawful, as they are no longer using it for a permitted
       purpose.
       >
       > In this case, [INSERT PPC NAME] has breached the PPSCoP in the
       following ways:
       >
       > [INSERT A SHORT SUMMARY OF THE BREACH(ES), e.g. failure to
       follow grace periods, misleading notices, refusal to engage with
       a complaint, pursuing a charge despite having evidence of
       disability or mitigation, etc.]
       >
       > These are not minor or technical breaches. They show a clear
       disregard for the standards required under the current single
       Code. As a result, the operator is no longer entitled to use the
       keeper data they obtained from the DVLA, because the purpose for
       which it was provided (a fair and lawful pursuit of a charge
       under the Code) no longer applies.
       >
       > The DVLA remains the Data Controller for the data it releases
       under KADOE, and is therefore responsible for ensuring that
       personal data is not misused by third parties. This includes
       taking action against AOS operators who breach the conditions
       under which the data was provided. I am therefore asking the
       DVLA to investigate this breach and to take appropriate action
       under the terms of the KADOE contract.
       >
       > This may include:
       >
       > [indent]• Confirming that a breach has occurred
       > • Taking enforcement action against the operator
       > •Suspending or terminating their KADOE access if
       warranted[/indent]
       >
       > I have attached relevant supporting material with this
       statement. Please confirm receipt and provide a reference for
       this complaint. I am also happy to provide further information
       if required.
       >
       > Name: [INSERT YOUR NAME]
       > Date: [INSERT DATE]
       --- End Quote ---
       [/quote]
       #Post#: 70595--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: insatiable
       Date: May 8, 2025, 3:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Wow. You guys are super helpful.
       Thanks so much.
       I'll get all this done and report back what happens.
       #Post#: 70694--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: insatiable
       Date: May 9, 2025, 9:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have decided to post my response rather than use the online
       form. I don't want to give them a load of data.
       It is interesting about the dates of issue etc, as they claim
       April 28th. But that means it took 7-8 working days to get here!
       I know the Royal Mail isn't the best nowadays, but I think
       someone is telling porkies.
       #Post#: 70699--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: May 9, 2025, 9:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I submitted a Smart Parking appeal earlier this week by
       coincidence - the only data you have to provide on the online
       form that you don't have to provide when submitting by post is
       your email address. The only other information required is your
       name and address, which they already have.
       If you have sent it by post, I hope you acquired a free
       certificate of posting from the post office, so that you have
       evidence that you sent it, if they subsequently claim not to
       have received it.
       --- Quote ---
       > I know the Royal Mail isn't the best nowadays, but I think
       someone is telling porkies.
       --- End Quote ---
       They'll be using a third party mail consolidator which are often
       somewhat slower.
       #Post#: 70703--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: insatiable
       Date: May 9, 2025, 10:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Got it, thanks and good point [member=103]DWMB2[/member] I have
       now done the online form.
       Thanks again.
       #Post#: 72200--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking Notice
   DIR By: insatiable
       Date: May 19, 2025, 10:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have received this back::
       Having considered your appeal in detail we have decided to
       uphold the Parking Charge (PC) as we
       believe that it was correctly issued in accordance with the
       terms and conditions advertised within the
       area concerned. As your appeal was received within the initial
       discount period, we have extended the
       discount period until 04/06/2025.
       As you were informed in our initial correspondence, we can
       confirm that the above parking charge was
       issued under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (POFA 2012).
       The parking contravention occurred
       on 14.04.2025, the registered keeper details were received on
       24.04.2025, after which the Parking
       Charge (PC) was promptly issued within the 14 days required
       under POFA 2012. You were also invited
       to provided us with the driver’s full name and current postal
       address, if you were not the driver at the
       time of the parking event.
       If you wish to provided driver details please send them via
       email to:
       COD@smartparking.com
       In the event that you fail to provide these details, we will use
       the provisions under POFA, 2012, and
       continue to pursue you the registered keeper, for the
       outstanding balance.
       Failure to provide these details, will result in Smart Parking
       using the provisions under POFA, 2012 to
       pursue you, the registered keeper, for the outstanding balance
       of the PC.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 4
   DIR Next Page