DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 70370--------------------------------------------------
       Group Nexus Parking Charge Notice Kettering Retail Park
   DIR By: JLA
       Date: May 7, 2025, 5:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Back again!
       Received this parking charge yesterday (6th May). Was in
       Northampton attending an event for my church (based in London)
       then a group of us went to eat at Pizza Hut in this retail park
       afterwards where we spent between £200-£300. I don't have the
       receipt as we didn't pay individually and the bill was paid in
       total by someone else. It was dark when we arrived so i honestly
       don't recall seeing any signs. I've searched on Google maps but
       the latest images they have are from 2023 and the signs are
       really not that clear and I won't be able to drive back there to
       check it out in person for the foreseeable. So my only hope is
       if there are any flaws on the parking charge that might make it
       unenforceable. I would as always be very grateful for any
       advice.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/g5stWnC/20250507-093645.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/ddnkphy
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/mrGZ7Rk2/20250507-094041.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/DPtcn1hv
       #Post#: 70628--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Group Nexus Parking Charge Notice Kettering Retail Park
   DIR By: JLA
       Date: May 9, 2025, 4:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Any advice at all please?
       #Post#: 70653--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Group Nexus Parking Charge Notice Kettering Retail Park
   DIR By: b789
       Date: May 9, 2025, 6:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Have you tried Plan A? Find out the landowner or managing agent
       for Kettering Retail Park and complain to them about this unfair
       PCN. I’m sure they don’t want their tenants being upset because
       of multiple complaints from their own customers about being
       invoiced for £100 for simply being a patron.
       At the end of the day, any appeal,is going to be rejected but
       you have to go through the motions. If the retail park
       owners/management don’t get it cancelled, then it will likely
       end up as a claim. However, that is not a bad thing and the most
       likely outcome of that is either a strike out or a
       discontinuation.
       If you’ve had no luck with Plan A by 28th May, follow this
       advice:
       There is no legal obligation on the known keeper (the recipient
       of the Notice to Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity of the
       unknown driver and no inference or assumptions can be made.
       The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which
       means that if the unknown driver is not identified, they cannot
       transfer liability for the charge from the unknown driver to the
       known keeper.
       Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove
       anything from it:
       --- Quote ---
       > I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking
       charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I
       will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your
       client landowner.
       >
       > As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL
       the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper
       of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even
       substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no
       admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions
       can be drawn. GroupNexus has relied on contract law allegations
       of breach against the driver only.
       >
       > The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
       been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
       of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable.
       GroupNexus have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us
       both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.
       --- End Quote ---
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1