URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 67719--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: CRAGINK Date: April 19, 2025, 6:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Should I contact Moorside Legal and the courts to see where
       things are at?
       #Post#: 67725--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: JustLoveCars Date: April 19, 2025, 7:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=CRAGINK link=topic=5997.msg67719#msg67719
       date=1745063364]
       Should I contact Moorside Legal and the courts to see where
       things are at?
       [/quote]Given they'll all be closed until Tuesday try using a
       free credit checker to see if you do have a CCJ registered...
       #Post#: 67741--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: b789 Date: April 19, 2025, 10:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=CRAGINK link=topic=5997.msg67706#msg67706
       date=1745058121]
       If I do have one, how do I get it removed?
       [/quote]
       If you have a CCJ that has been issued by default because you
       followed bonkers advice from a bunch of whackos, then you
       probably can't.You could try and sue the nutters that have now
       screwed you for the next 6 years of financial hell, but I doubt
       that is going to get you much satisfaction.
       If a claim hasn't been issued yet, then anything issued by the
       utter incompetents at Moorside Legal is very easily defended and
       won.
       #Post#: 67766--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: DWMB2 Date: April 19, 2025, 12:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]You could try and sue the nutters[/quote]
       Not if they're operating under admiralty law  ::)
       (OP, I'm not criticising you, I'm criticising the fools who
       offered you the previous shoddy advice)
       For now, check your credit file to see where you're up to.
       #Post#: 67879--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: CRAGINK Date: April 21, 2025, 4:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi
       Sorry its taken so long to reply.
       It's been a total nightmare registering with Experian (long
       story) but now registered with Checkmyfile and it looks like I
       don't have a CCJ yet. Credit score is still good.
       What should I do now?
       Hey, thanks for all your help. I appreciate its the bank holiday
       weekend.
       #Post#: 67882--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: b789 Date: April 21, 2025, 5:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As you never even opened the Claim, you do not have access to
       MCOL to do it online today. This is a SNAFU that could go FUBAR
       very easily.
       Without seeing the actual PoC, it is difficult to advise
       precisely. However, as you have very limited time to get this
       done and do't have access to MCOL, the only way you can do
       anything is to email your defence to the CNBC today. It won't
       even be dealt with until some time eon Tuesday, if you're lucky,
       and you have to hope that Moorside Legal don't request a default
       CCJ before the defence is entered into the system.
       As it is the incompetents at Moorside Legal that have filed the
       claim, I am fairly confident that they will not have complied
       with CPR 16.4(1)(a) so you need to follow these instructions:
       Here is the defence and link to the draft order and relevant
       transcripts that go with it. You only need to edit your name and
       the claim number. You sign the defence by typing your full name
       for the signature and date it. There is nothing to edit in the
       draft order.
       When you're ready you send all the documents as a single PDF
       attachment (in the order of 'defence', 'draft order' and then
       the 2 'transcripts') in an email to
       claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and CC in yourself. The claim
       number must be in the email subject field and in the body of the
       email just put: "Please find attached the defence and draft
       order in the matter of Carflow Ltd v [your full name] Claim no.:
       [claim number]."
       [quote]
       [center]IN THE COUNTY COURT[/center]
       [right]Claim No: [Claim Number][/right]
       [center]BETWEEN:
       Carflow Ltd
       Claimant
       - and -
       [Defendant's Full Name]
       
Defendant
       [hr]
       DEFENCE[/center]
       1. The Defendant denies the claim in its entirety. The Defendant
       asserts that there is no liability to the Claimant and that no
       debt is owed. The claim is without merit and does not adequately
       disclose any comprehensible cause of action.
       2. There is a lack of precise detail in the Particulars of Claim
       (PoC) in respect of the factual and legal allegations made
       against the Defendant such that the PoC do not comply with CPR
       16.4(1)(a).
       3. The Defendant is unable to plead properly to the PoC because:
       [indent](a) The contract referred to is not detailed or attached
       to the PoC in accordance with CPR PD 16(7.5);
       (b) The PoC do not state the exact wording of the clause (or
       clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract (or
       contracts) which is/are relied on;
       (c) The PoC do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons)
       why the claimant asserts the defendant has breached the contract
       (or contracts)
       (d) The PoC do not state with sufficient particularity
       exactly where the breach occurred, the exact time when the
       breach occurred and how long it is alleged that the vehicle was
       parked before the parking charge was allegedly incurred;
       (e) The PoC do not state precisely how the sum claimed is
       calculated, including the basis for any statutory interest,
       damages, or other charges;
       (f) The PoC do not state what proportion of the claim is the
       parking charge and what proportion is damages;
       (g) The PoC do not provide clarity on whether the Defendant is
       sued as the driver or the keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant
       cannot plead alternative causes of action without
       specificity.[/indent]
       4. The Defendant cites the cases of CEL v Chan 2023 [E7GM9W44]
       and CPMS v Akande 2024 [K0DP5J30], which are persuasive
       appellate decisions. In these cases, claims were struck out due
       to identical failures to comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a). Transcripts
       of these decisions are attached to this Defence.
       5. The Defendant attaches to this defence a copy of a draft
       order approved by a district judge at another court. The court
       struck out the claim of its own initiative after determining
       that the Particulars of Claim failed to comply with CPR
       16.4.(1)(a). The judge noted that the claimant had failed to:
       [indent](i) Set out the exact wording of the clause (or clauses)
       of the terms and conditions relied upon;
       (ii) Failed to explain the reasons why the defendant was
       allegedly in breach of contract;
       (iii) Provide separate, detailed Particulars of Claim as
       permitted under CPR PD 7C.5.2(2).
       (iv) The court further observed that, given the modest sum
       claimed, requiring further case management steps would be
       disproportionate and contrary to the overriding objective.
       Accordingly, the judge struck out the claim outright rather than
       permitting an amendment.[/indent]
       6. The Defendant submits that the same reasoning applies in this
       case and invites the court to adopt a similar approach by
       striking out the claim for the Claimant’s failure to comply with
       CPR 16.4(1)(a).
       Statement of truth
       I believe that the facts stated in this Defence are true. I
       understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought
       against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false
       statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without
       an honest belief in its truth.
       Signed:
       Date:[/quote]
       Draft Order for the defence
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zc23txk7poctyyxiv2ytx/Strikeout-order-1-a-v2.1.pdf?rlkey=pancly3z6zwqt2cra5rvvh3ls&st=nq7a58tz&dl=0
       CEL v Chan Transcript
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/nb9ypbecuurpmln00dily/CELvChan-appeal-transcript.pdf?rlkey=7mpuvpmpe45s2zbhch21om1ez&st=i8dnbod3&dl=0
       CPMS v Akande Transcript
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/y631olc61z1slr6xfrdsk/CPM-v-AKANDE.pdf?rlkey=kltpojedcxiwarxr0sdfyjo05&st=qi4lv3fv&dl=0
       If you want an editable MS Word file with everything in a single
       document which you can then save/export as a single PDF file
       when ready to send, use this:
       MS Word .docx file for defence [CPR 16.4(1)(a)]
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/krubcbnf27bsis66pq4yg/Short-defence-strikeout-CPR16.4-1-a-3.docx?rlkey=z87f3h8is3hgnp7sqr8plsz99&st=ldawlubu&dl=0
       #Post#: 67886--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: CRAGINK Date: April 21, 2025, 5:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OK thank you for that!
       I don't have a claim number. Should I call the court tomorrow?
       How do I find which court the claim is lodged in?
       #Post#: 67888--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: b789 Date: April 21, 2025, 5:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you've not responded, then it is still with the CNBC. Call
       them as early as possible on 0300 123 1056.
       Ask to speak to someone about a claim issued against you where
       you do not have the claim number. Be prepared to provide:
       [indent]• Your full name
       • Your full current address
       • Possibly your date of birth (to help distinguish you from
       others with the same name)[/indent]
       They will not give details unless they can identify you
       confidently.
       However, you must understand that by not having the claim number
       you are now delaying getting your defence registered for another
       day. I cannot stress how badly you've been advised by these
       nutcases and you are now at very serious risk of getting a CCJ
       by default!
       #Post#: 67889--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: CRAGINK Date: April 21, 2025, 6:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'll do it first thing tomorrow. Thank you so much!
       #Post#: 67891--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Court form received requesting financial details
       By: DWMB2 Date: April 21, 2025, 6:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Be prepared for a fair wait on the phone. Call as soon as they
       open.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page