DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 66918--------------------------------------------------
Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles entering a
Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: NTIAEP
Date: April 13, 2025, 3:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello once again to all fellow forum members!!
When it rains, it pours! Already have 2 other PCNs currently in
play. One which I'll probably pay after receiving the NTO (but
still under advice so may contest), the other will be going to
tribunal.
Have since received another 2 different PCNs (unrelated to the
above-mentioned) for the same alleged contravention in exactly
the same location, each 18mins apart.
To summarise, I volunteer for a local religious
institution/charity (and which I was doing so at the time) as a
result was told that I'd be put on an exemption list.
Unfortunately, due to an administrative oversight, this didn't
happen and the rest is history. The charity will see whether
the PCNs can be cancelled, but in the meantime the details for
both are as follows:
PCN_AF30857967_redacted
HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/e9rl6d8cw22p3t8k25jlr/20250409_SAF17A_PCN_AF30857967_20250404_redacted.pdf?rlkey=22xnc6lw2zr2hyfosiywxht67&st=f587lk43&dl=0
PCN_AF30858289_redacted
HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/0vhmzozz06pwlwal0jr19/20250409_SAF17A_PCN_AF30858289_20250404_redacted.pdf?rlkey=rqijkcdgbwfkbppn3pchf0qbx&st=5majxjcw&dl=0
GSV link (Sep2024) - still the same
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/WP1HKc2o13mCb7oa6
Sign on approach to restriction
HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/4rwik5zs4n14otabnfm4a/sign-outside-121-Balfour-Rd-IG1.jpg?rlkey=zqe7k71s8m93asl3ffnbomk5f&st=lech689p&dl=0
HTML https://my.redbridge.gov.uk/parkingpcn/review
HTML https://my.redbridge.gov.uk/parkingpcn/review
Don't think there is much more to add so your collective
thoughts/advice is welcome.
Regards - NTIAEP
P.S. I get the feeling that ever since I had 2 appeals allowed
at at a rehearing towards the end of last year, I've upset the
CCTV operator at Redbridge Parking enforcement. >:(
#Post#: 66927--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles
entering a Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: April 13, 2025, 4:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Not the charity's ticket. They can provide a statement only. See
you again no doubt.
#Post#: 68170--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles
entering a Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: NTIAEP
Date: April 22, 2025, 6:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Submitted the following reps for both PCNs:
"The contravention did not occur because:
1. The signage pertaining to term time is proscribed and there
are no warning signs.
2. Your website as per the attached screenshots fetters
discretion and limits to one ground of representation which
flies in the face of the law and the PCN thereby causing
confusion.
In light of the above, please cancel."
#Post#: 86240--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles
entering a Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: NTIAEP
Date: August 18, 2025, 6:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Appeal allowed (EA DNC) for one of the PCNs. I can only assume
it will be the same for the other.
Outcome
HTML https://londontribunals.org.uk/ords/pwslive/f?p=14952:70::INITIALISE::70:P70_CAS_REFNO,P70_PCN_REFNO,P70_RETURN_PAGE,P70_AST_CODE:1687749,3094169,60,APPEAL&cs=3Ve8S8HjKCP2ARvDbDlxm_9HefbbJmt7XXAQYntKrEEsbUWICbzJ1D4jFaEzLj7Mg6ZuFvHBIrYRRx3fpe5ou_Q
#Post#: 86741--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles
entering a Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: August 22, 2025, 4:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: NTIAEP link ---
>
> Appeal allowed (EA DNC) for one of the PCNs. I can only
assume it will be the same for the other.
>
> Outcome
HTML https://londontribunals.org.uk/ords/pwslive/f?p=14952:70::INITIALISE::70:P70_CAS_REFNO,P70_PCN_REFNO,P70_RETURN_PAGE,P70_AST_CODE:1687749,3094169,60,APPEAL&cs=3Ve8S8HjKCP2ARvDbDlxm_9HefbbJmt7XXAQYntKrEEsbUWICbzJ1D4jFaEzLj7Mg6ZuFvHBIrYRRx3fpe5ou_Q
>
--- End Quote ---
Link is expired. I'll ask [member=1]cp8759[/member] to publish
latter. Mr Teper allowed the second one. 2250260842. I'm The
Invisible Man again! 8)
#Post#: 86748--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles
entering a Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: flash2005
Date: August 22, 2025, 5:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: NTIAEP link ---
>
> Submitted the following reps for both PCNs:
>
>
> "The contravention did not occur because:
>
> 1. The signage pertaining to term time is proscribed and
there are no warning signs.
> 2. Your website as per the attached screenshots fetters
discretion and limits to one ground of representation which
flies in the face of the law and the PCN thereby causing
confusion.
>
> In light of the above, please cancel."
>
--- End Quote ---
I can possibly use your point 2 in my appeal as well. Have sent
you a DM
#Post#: 86832--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles
entering a Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: NTIAEP
Date: August 22, 2025, 1:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: flash2005 link ---
>
> [quote author=NTIAEP link=topic=5934.msg68170#msg68170
date=1745362892]
> Submitted the following reps for both PCNs:
>
>
> "The contravention did not occur because:
>
> 1. The signage pertaining to term time is proscribed and
there are no warning signs.
> 2. Your website as per the attached screenshots fetters
discretion and limits to one ground of representation which
flies in the face of the law and the PCN thereby causing
confusion.
>
> In light of the above, please cancel."
>
--- End Quote ---
I can possibly use your point 2 in my appeal as well. Have sent
you a DM
[/quote]Hi [member=970]flash2005[/member]
It seems that LBR has recently changed the layout and content of
the parking section of its website, so 2. above might now not be
relevant to your appeal.
#Post#: 86833--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles
entering a Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: NTIAEP
Date: August 22, 2025, 1:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
......and many heartfelt thanks again and much appreciation to
one of the forum's maestros [member=24]Hippocrates[/member]
#Post#: 86845--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles
entering a Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: August 22, 2025, 5:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I was The Invisible Man.
#Post#: 86921--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge/53j-FailingToComply..Restriction..vehicles
entering a Pedestrian zone (camera)/MelbourneRd
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: August 23, 2025, 10:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Outcome
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/14rFYdI5OG5rsuuamEVHnuv86xutfVpbS/view.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1