DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 66667--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: ugo
Date: April 11, 2025, 11:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> So why did you push the bike through the restriction. Apart
from to get to the other side.
>
--- End Quote ---
Reasons
- Needed to get to the other side in a quick way, without
wasting time and polluting more. The place I needed to get to
was just behind the gate. To do 15 meters and get on the other
side, to this bakery, I could either spend 15 mins in traffic,
or push the bike for 30 seconds and park it behind the gate. See
map:
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/QmJPSGc9jm2TatYp9
- I was low on fuel, and I couldn't afford driving more
#Post#: 66673--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: April 11, 2025, 12:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I'll get back later tonight
#Post#: 66697--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: ManxTom
Date: April 11, 2025, 5:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: ugo link ---
>
> [quote author=stamfordman link=topic=5889.msg66551#msg66551
date=1744321323]
> So why did you push the bike through the restriction. Apart
from to get to the other side.
>
--- End Quote ---
Reasons
- Needed to get to the other side in a quick way, without
wasting time and polluting more. The place I needed to get to
was just behind the gate. To do 15 meters and get on the other
side, to this bakery, I could either spend 15 mins in traffic,
or push the bike for 30 seconds and park it behind the gate. See
map:
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/QmJPSGc9jm2TatYp9
- I was low on fuel, and I couldn't afford driving more
[/quote]
If the bakery was just the other side of the restriction
couldn't you have just parked your bike, walked to the bakery
and returned?
#Post#: 66725--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: April 12, 2025, 6:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=5087]ugo[/member] What is the actual date of the PCN?
#Post#: 66834--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: ugo
Date: April 13, 2025, 3:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [member=5087]ugo[/member] What is the actual date of the PCN?
>
--- End Quote ---
Penalty Charge Notice No. QZ18620254
Date of this notice: 24/03/2025
Date of Contravention: 17/03/2025
#Post#: 66854--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: April 13, 2025, 5:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
What is the actual date of the Notice of Rejection? I cannot
work out if their dates are correct without this. And when did
you receive it?
#Post#: 67344--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: ugo
Date: April 16, 2025, 6:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> What is the actual date of the Notice of Rejection? I cannot
work out if their dates are correct without this. And when did
you receive it?
>
--- End Quote ---
The rejection letter is dated 10/04/2025
Can you help me understand where you're going with this please?
It sounds like you may be looking for a reason why the rejection
is invalid (e.g. given the dates if they responded late), but
you think that there's no other reason to appeal their decision,
correct?
#Post#: 67351--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: April 16, 2025, 6:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: ugo link ---
>
> [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=5889.msg66854#msg66854
date=1744540273]
> What is the actual date of the Notice of Rejection? I cannot
work out if their dates are correct without this. And when did
you receive it?
>
--- End Quote ---
The rejection letter is dated 10/04/2025
Can you help me understand where you're going with this please?
It sounds like you may be looking for a reason why the rejection
is invalid (e.g. given the dates if they responded late), but
you think that there's no other reason to appeal their decision,
correct?
[/quote]
@ugo
1. 10th April? Please confirm.
The amount outstanding on the PCN is £65.00, and will increase
to £130.00 on Fri, 25 Apr 2025. However, this PCN currently has
an offer, meaning you can pay at a reduced rate of £65.00. This
offer expires on Tue, 22 Apr 2025. Please pay £65.00 now.
You have already made representations for this PCN and we
replied on Thu, 3 Apr 2025. You cannot make representations
twice.
2. They should not be requesting £65 before you have appealed to
the Tribunal. This is opportunistic and prejudicial.
3. This is total bolleaux and I say Tribunal time.
More than happy to represent f.o.c.
#Post#: 67360--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: ugo
Date: April 16, 2025, 7:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [quote author=ugo link=topic=5889.msg67344#msg67344
date=1744803525]
> [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=5889.msg66854#msg66854
date=1744540273]
> What is the actual date of the Notice of Rejection? I cannot
work out if their dates are correct without this. And when did
you receive it?
>
--- End Quote ---
The rejection letter is dated 10/04/2025
Can you help me understand where you're going with this please?
It sounds like you may be looking for a reason why the rejection
is invalid (e.g. given the dates if they responded late), but
you think that there's no other reason to appeal their decision,
correct?
[/quote]
[member=5087]ugo[/member]
1. 10th April? Please confirm.
The amount outstanding on the PCN is £65.00, and will increase
to £130.00 on Fri, 25 Apr 2025. However, this PCN currently has
an offer, meaning you can pay at a reduced rate of £65.00. This
offer expires on Tue, 22 Apr 2025. Please pay £65.00 now.
You have already made representations for this PCN and we
replied on Thu, 3 Apr 2025. You cannot make representations
twice.
2. They should not be requesting £65 before you have appealed to
the Tribunal. This is opportunistic and prejudicial.
3. This is total bolleaux and I say Tribunal time.
More than happy to represent f.o.c.
[/quote]
1- Yes - their rejection is dated 10/04
Notice of Rejection of representations
PENALTY CHARGE NOTICE NUMBER: QZ18620254
Our Ref: QZ18620254
10/04/2025
2- Why is that? What they said is attached
3- Ok, on what basis? I'm happy to do so, do you want to send me
a message with your email and I can get in touch?
Thank you!
[attachment deleted by admin]
#Post#: 67385--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hackney, Code 52 - Motorcycle pushed through motor vehicle
restriction – Richmond Rd / Eleanor Rd
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: April 16, 2025, 9:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=24]Hippocrates[/member], surely the website simply
reiterates what's been conveyed in the NOR. How could there be
anything untoward in the website and NOR being aligned, after
all one of your successful lines at adjudication has been where
they are not which would suggest they're in a no-win situation.
A non-statutory discount/offer/bribe/carrot is always
conditional.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 3
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page