DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 66484--------------------------------------------------
Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: cesur
Date: April 10, 2025, 10:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
PCN over parking on footpath in Bexley.
Any chance this may slip at the adjudicator stage?
HTML https://imgur.kageurufu.net/tfWHIAD.jpeg
HTML https://imgur.kageurufu.net/IFXdAB.jpeg
HTML https://imgur.kageurufu.net/t6eKYE8.jpeg
HTML https://imgur.kageurufu.net//VTSGIir.jpeg
HTML https://imgur.kageurufu.net/vjzybbC.jpeg
HTML https://imgur.kageurufu.net/WCvdlat.jpeg
#Post#: 66486--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: April 10, 2025, 11:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Where exactly were you on Google Maps. There is marked footway
parking in that road but it looks like you were well before the
sign.
That doesn't mean there isn't a resolution exemption for the
whole road though.
#Post#: 66491--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: cesur
Date: April 10, 2025, 11:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Google Maps link:
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/25oAy1HW5aRmyUN19
#Post#: 67980--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: cesur
Date: April 21, 2025, 8:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Are there any further advice on this?
Should I wait for NTK regardless and hope to get the fee reduced
back to £70 in the worst case, or not worth wasting time?
I think this should be paid on Wednesday to qualify as an early
payment..
Previously [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] helped to cancel the
PCN due to reasons for appeal not sufficient on the website
however they corrected it. I don't know if there would be any
other grounds for appeal.
#Post#: 67999--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: April 22, 2025, 4:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The 14-day period for making a risk-free* challenge and payment
of the discount ends today, 22 Apr(14 days beginning on 9th, not
from 9th).
I'd make simple reps that you understood that parking with 2
wheels on the footway was allowed in the road as you have seen
cars doing this on a regular basis. If you are wrong then you
apologise and would ask the authority to exercise discretion and
cancel as this is your first** PCN.
*- you haven't posted the back of the PCN, so I'm assuming that
this provision - which is commonplace- is included.
**- if true.
Are you the registered keeper with current DVLA
#Post#: 68001--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: April 22, 2025, 4:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You could include:
I believe the contravention may not in case have occurred as you
have probably passed a resolution disapplying the footway
parking ban on Hall Place Crescent given the presence of such
parking elsewhere in the road.
Please confirm the existence of this resolution and its extent
in considering my challenge.
#Post#: 68014--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: cesur
Date: April 22, 2025, 5:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the heads up, I will appeal today.
Back of PCN:
HTML https://imgur.kageurufu.net/GYBMtT9.jpeg
--- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
>
> The 14-day period for making a risk-free* challenge and
payment of the discount ends today, 22 Apr(14 days beginning on
9th, not from 9th).
>
> I'd make simple reps that you understood that parking with 2
wheels on the footway was allowed in the road as you have seen
cars doing this on a regular basis. If you are wrong then you
apologise and would ask the authority to exercise discretion and
cancel as this is your first** PCN.
>
>
> *- you haven't posted the back of the PCN, so I'm assuming
that this provision - which is commonplace- is included.
>
> **- if true.
>
> Are you the registered keeper with current DVLA
>
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 68015--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: cesur
Date: April 22, 2025, 5:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Based on [member=1]cp8759[/member]'s documents posted on a
similar subject about Bexley council, it doesn't look like this
road was applied a resolution, happy to be corrected though if I
missed anything.
- Traffic and transportation sub-committee report of 15th
September 1994
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pL6p8vmMQZsw7kvwMrKDtN-t-wDX9Bar/view
- Public Works Committee Agenda of 13 October 1994 (see page 308
for a map of Olron Crescent)
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IAs-NoI8XeRuJnntEpICK3sb6ZlyDbJp/view
- Public Works Committee minutes of 13 October 1994
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Kc6KEwkLyna0NRmQJK0k3T265mldzc1I/view
- Full council resolution of 11 November 1994
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yWAv0idbw3vViG-5TrQjhp2zDqxeYQdf/view
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> You could include:
>
> I believe the contravention may not in case have occurred as
you have probably passed a resolution disapplying the footway
parking ban on Hall Place Crescent given the presence of such
parking elsewhere in the road.
>
> Please confirm the existence of this resolution and its extent
in considering my challenge.
>
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 68026--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: cesur
Date: April 22, 2025, 6:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It is interesting that there is no mention of Hall Pl Crescent
in the documents, although this road has marked bays half on the
footway where vehicles can park and must be exempt from footway
parking restrictions, mustn't it?
--- Quote from: cesur link ---
>
> Based on [member=1]cp8759[/member]'s documents posted on a
similar subject about Bexley council, it doesn't look like this
road was applied a resolution, happy to be corrected though if I
missed anything.
>
>
>
- Traffic and transportation sub-committee report of 15th
September 1994
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pL6p8vmMQZsw7kvwMrKDtN-t-wDX9Bar/view
>
- Public Works Committee Agenda of 13 October 1994 (see page 308
for a map of Olron Crescent)
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IAs-NoI8XeRuJnntEpICK3sb6ZlyDbJp/view
>
- Public Works Committee minutes of 13 October 1994
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Kc6KEwkLyna0NRmQJK0k3T265mldzc1I/view
>
- Full council resolution of 11 November 1994
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yWAv0idbw3vViG-5TrQjhp2zDqxeYQdf/view
>
> [quote author=stamfordman link=topic=5886.msg68001#msg68001
date=1745313522]
> You could include:
>
> I believe the contravention may not in case have occurred as
you have probably passed a resolution disapplying the footway
parking ban on Hall Place Crescent given the presence of such
parking elsewhere in the road.
>
> Please confirm the existence of this resolution and its extent
in considering my challenge.
>
--- End Quote ---
[/quote]
#Post#: 68048--------------------------------------------------
Re: Bexley, code 62 parked with one or more wheels on or over a
footpath
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: April 22, 2025, 7:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
E mail received. The website is now fixed so that angle is not
possible.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 5
DIR Next Page