URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 70828--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton - Contravention code 83 parked without displaying a
       ticket
   DIR By: fizz90
       Date: May 10, 2025, 2:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you for all your help - I have actioned this exactly as
       you have set out including the link. Screenshot of
       representations successfully made below.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 77312--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton - Contravention code 83 parked without displaying a
       ticket
   DIR By: fizz90
       Date: June 20, 2025, 4:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Appeal rejected - see letter attached.
       Presumably we appeal again? Their reasoning seems rogue?
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 77344--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton - Contravention code 83 parked without displaying a
       ticket
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: June 20, 2025, 6:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       No offer of discount, so it is now a total no-brainer to take
       them to London Tribunals.
       #Post#: 77416--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton - Contravention code 83 parked without displaying a
       ticket
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: June 20, 2025, 11:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'll drop you a PM in case you'd like me to represent you.
       #Post#: 77431--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton - Contravention code 83 parked without displaying a
       ticket
   DIR By: fizz90
       Date: June 20, 2025, 1:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok yes. So do I need to embellish my original appeal?
       #Post#: 77498--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton - Contravention code 83 parked without displaying a
       ticket
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: June 21, 2025, 6:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well no, you'd want to pursue the arguments made in Ivan Bachkov
       v London Borough of Newham (2250079444, 20 June 2025)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iBy4Gj1CzFEza6nfV9y8mLwolvbZ-C5a/view<br
       />and if you want to represent yourself I can send you the
       screenshot evidence for that.
       #Post#: 77502--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton - Contravention code 83 parked without displaying a
       ticket
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: June 21, 2025, 7:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       IMO, yours is an appeal on statutory grounds, namely that the
       'contravention did not occur' because display of a P&D ticket,
       in fact display of anything, is optional and therefore it is
       axiomatic that non-display cannot give rise to the cited
       contravention.
       #Post#: 77505--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton - Contravention code 83 parked without displaying a
       ticket
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: June 21, 2025, 7:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > IMO, yours is an appeal on statutory grounds, namely that the
       'contravention did not occur' because display of a P&D ticket,
       in fact display of anything, is optional and therefore it is
       axiomatic that non-display cannot give rise to the cited
       contravention.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       True, but two grounds are better than one.
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 4
   DIR Previous Page