URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 71998--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Pastmybest
       Date: May 17, 2025, 3:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Pastmybest link ---
       >
       > Got it i will draft something for you tomorrow evening
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Can you confirm your exact parking spot. Is it here?
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5796063,0.0622555,3a,90y,11.49h,93.74t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sPbqZoH9sYRNtRcgQI6DMog!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-3.7444762048315567%26panoid%3DPbqZoH9sYRNtRcgQI6DMog%26yaw%3D11.489395957884511!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUxMy4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
       #Post#: 72002--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Coldhands
       Date: May 17, 2025, 3:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Pastmybest link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Pastmybest link=topic=5773.msg71876#msg71876
       date=1747421549]
       > Got it i will draft something for you tomorrow evening
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Can you confirm your exact parking spot. Is it here?
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5796063,0.0622555,3a,90y,11.49h,93.74t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sPbqZoH9sYRNtRcgQI6DMog!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-3.7444762048315567%26panoid%3DPbqZoH9sYRNtRcgQI6DMog%26yaw%3D11.489395957884511!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUxMy4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
       [/quote]
       No, this is the exact spot -
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/sgMCNK5R5iRzPAxv9
       - outside 90 Woodford
       ave
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 72022--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Pastmybest
       Date: May 18, 2025, 6:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Great.
       The photos taken by TFL show the back of the sign and the
       markings though not as clearly as GSV so a formal representation
       needs be no more than
       Formal representation re
       PCN number xxxxxxx
       VRM number AA 23 ABC
       I make formal representation to the council with regard to the
       above numbered PCN on the basis that
       The alleged contravention did not occur;
       Your response to my informal challenge was a rejection on the
       basis that there are no signs or markings at the location. This
       is not correct. in the attached GSV both a sign and markings can
       be seen
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5801391,0.061252,3a,20.3y,339.15h,81.56t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sylXYaT0erfUzkKPVpjnziA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D8.437860915054173%26panoid%3DylXYaT0erfUzkKPVpjnziA%26yaw%3D339.1504367120462!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUxMy4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
       As your GLA 2007 314 creates an exemption and the sign and
       markings specify parking on the pavement as evidenced is allowed
       the PCN and NTO must be cancelled
       Regards
       #Post#: 72034--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: May 18, 2025, 7:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think TfL get this issue.
       To go back to 1974, London was split into metropolitan roads and
       borough roads. The GLC was responsible for metropolitan roads
       alone but with support of London boroughs promoted the GLC
       General Powers Act prohibiting parking on the footway anywhere
       within the Greater London area. But they provided a means by
       which boroughs and now TfL could opt out for any roads in their
       area.
       Disapplication of the GP Act does NOT of itself create parking
       places on the footway, it simply disapplies the footway parking
       ban thereby permitting waiting on the footway PROVIDED that
       there is not another provision restricting this e.g. yellow and,
       now, RED lines etc.
       What TfL have done is:
       To exclude those lengths of street(NOT just the footway but the
       carriageway as well) for those items in Schedule 2A.
       But they have placed DRL there.
       That's unlawful.
       3. General prohibition of stopping
       (1) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (2) and (3) of this
       article, and of
       articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, no person shall cause any vehicle
       to stop on a
       red route during the restricted hours.
       (2) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this article,
       and of articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, no person shall cause any
       vehicle to stop at any time on a length of red route specified
       in schedule 4.
       (3) The controls specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this
       article do not apply in respect of any area of or length of road
       specified in an item in column (2) of the table in schedule 2A.
       So, NONE of the 'lengths of road specified in column (2) of the
       table in Schedule 2A ' may be marked with DRL.
       But they are!
       My emphasis above. A 'red route' is the whole road and not, as
       TfL make believe, the carriageway alone.
       #Post#: 72066--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Pastmybest
       Date: May 18, 2025, 11:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > I don't think TfL get this issue.
       >
       > To go back to 1974, London was split into metropolitan roads
       and borough roads. The GLC was responsible for metropolitan
       roads alone but with support of London boroughs promoted the GLC
       General Powers Act prohibiting parking on the footway anywhere
       within the Greater London area. But they provided a means by
       which boroughs and now TfL could opt out for any roads in their
       area.
       >
       > Disapplication of the GP Act does NOT of itself create parking
       places on the footway, it simply disapplies the footway parking
       ban thereby permitting waiting on the footway PROVIDED that
       there is not another provision restricting this e.g. yellow and,
       now, RED lines etc.
       >
       > What TfL have done is:
       >
       > To exclude those lengths of street(NOT just the footway but
       the carriageway as well) for those items in Schedule 2A.
       >
       > But they have placed DRL there.
       >
       > That's unlawful.
       >
       > 3. General prohibition of stopping
       > (1) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (2) and (3) of
       this article, and of
       > articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, no person shall cause any
       vehicle to stop on a
       > red route during the restricted hours.
       > (2) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this
       article, and of articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, no person shall
       cause any vehicle to stop at any time on a length of red route
       specified in schedule 4.
       > (3) The controls specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this
       article do not apply in respect of any area of or length of road
       specified in an item in column (2) of the table in schedule 2A.
       >
       > So, NONE of the 'lengths of road specified in column (2) of
       the table in Schedule 2A ' may be marked with DRL.
       >
       > But they are!
       >
       > My emphasis above. A 'red route' is the whole road and not, as
       TfL make believe, the carriageway alone.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       true but it will not matter at this stage you and I both know
       TfL think they can make it up as they gp along
       #Post#: 72070--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: May 18, 2025, 11:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As in so-called footway parking signs annotated:
       'In marked areas only'
       OP, the mandated sign is : 'in marked bays'.
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/7/made
       Part 2 Sign Table, Item 15, Col (4) refers.
       #Post#: 75297--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Coldhands
       Date: June 7, 2025, 3:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Interestingly a week after receiving my formal reps, someone has
       been to this location and marked out all the faded bays in
       chalk. And more interestingly have marked the exact area where I
       was parked as bike parking. Seems TfL may have taken my feedback
       seriously?
       #Post#: 93164--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Coldhands
       Date: October 7, 2025, 3:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       TfL didn't take any further action on this PCN, but also didn't
       send through any correspondence to cancel it. Is there anything
       else I need to do or is the PCN considered effectively cancelled
       after any particular length of time?
       #Post#: 93179--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Grant Urismo
       Date: October 7, 2025, 4:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm not suggesting actually doing this without getting a lot
       more official legal advice than I'm able to offer in my role as
       a completely unqualified random stranger on the internet, but In
       your shoes I'd consider a note saying something like:
       Dear Parking
       Bearing in mind that that putting up a sign that says I can park
       somewhere then fining me for believing that sign obviously
       constitutes entrapment, and I've heard nothing from you for a
       while, I believe my current options are:
       1) Hire a legal team, apply to the Court for a stay, and ask the
       Court to award costs
       or
       2) Pay up then hire a legal team, prosecute the Council for
       unlawful enrichment, get my money back and ask the Court to
       award costs.
       ...unless of course can you confirm that you've dropped the
       matter?
       #Post#: 93216--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: October 7, 2025, 6:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Coldhands link ---
       >
       > TfL didn't take any further action on this PCN, but also
       didn't send through any correspondence to cancel it. Is there
       anything else I need to do or is the PCN considered effectively
       cancelled after any particular length of time?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       What is the online status/history of the PCN say?
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page