URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 69379--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Coldhands
       Date: April 30, 2025, 8:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       TfL got back to me. Interestingly an order does exist setting
       out an exemption that covers this spot. See schedule 2a, item
       25.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 69789--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Coldhands
       Date: May 2, 2025, 3:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I received a joke of a response to my informal representation,
       below, followed by my notice to owner a bit after. Any advice on
       anything in particular to include in formal representations?
       Thank you for your informal representation regarding the above
       Penalty Charge Notice (PCN).
       Transport for London (TfL) acknowledge the comments raised
       within your representation stating that as seen in the image
       provided, the vehicle was parked in a marked parking bay,
       similar to the other vehicles parked along this stretch.
       Although,
       the painted lines are very faded. Furthermore given this, you
       believe there was no contravention.
       We issued the PCN because your vehicle was observed parked with
       one or more wheels on or over a footpath or any part
       of a road other than a carriageway on the date and time of
       contravention at the above location. The Highway Code item 244
       states that a vehicle "MUST NOT park partially or wholly on the
       pavement in London, and should not do so elsewhere
       unless signs permit it. Parking on the pavement can obstruct and
       seriously inconvenience pedestrians, people in
       wheelchairs or with visual impairments and people with prams or
       pushchairs". Parking on the pavement or verge is
       therefore potentially dangerous to pedestrians, and could
       potentially cause damage to pipes and cables housed under the
       paving stones. In the few locations where parking on the
       pavement is allowed, it is clearly indicated by signs and road
       markings. There is no signage or road marking in place at the
       above location indicating that parking in this manner is
       permitted.
       It is the legal responsibility of every road user and business
       operator to identify all the traffic laws that must be complied
       with, and to then comply. The relief of congestion and the
       improvement of traffic flows are of strategic importance to
       London. The red routes are by definition roads that are
       particularly sensitive to the disruptive effect of illegal
       stopping. As
       the Highway Authority with the responsibility for the
       performance of the red route network, TfL places a very high
       priority on
       achieving full compliance with the restrictions and expects
       every road user to plan and operate their road use fully within
       the
       law at all times.
       The Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO) in this case is considered
       by Transport for London (TfL) as a credible witness. The
       Officer is employed by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) as
       a CEO and was acting on behalf of TfL in enforcing the red
       route regulations.
       We have considered your informal representation. However we do
       not consider you have established grounds or suitable
       reasons for the Penalty Charge to be cancelled.
       #Post#: 69802--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: May 2, 2025, 10:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please post the NtO (only redact yr name & address - leave all
       else, especially the date, in).
       I think (but do wait and see what others say) you could write
       something like
       I rely on my original challenge and also the exemption to the
       ban on footway parling granted by your order [give title of
       Order and date}.
       #Post#: 71001--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Coldhands
       Date: May 12, 2025, 5:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks. Notice to owner is here -
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/ej9rowr
       PCN - 26th March
       Informal rep - 2nd April
       Response from tfl - 7th April
       NtO - 29th April
       #Post#: 71014--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Enceladus
       Date: May 12, 2025, 6:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Coldhands link ---
       >
       > Thanks. Notice to owner is here -
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/ej9rowr
       >
       > PCN - 26th March
       > Informal rep - 2nd April
       > Response from tfl - 7th April
       > NtO - 29th April
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Informal representation rejected 7th April and NtO 29th April?
       Please post up all of the TFL rejection? Redact your name &
       address and email address.
       #Post#: 71030--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Coldhands
       Date: May 12, 2025, 8:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, TfL rejection went to my spam initially so didn't see it
       until a bit later. Full letter attached.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 71804--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Coldhands
       Date: May 16, 2025, 6:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       does the timing of the rejection to informal reps have any
       bearing on my case?
       #Post#: 71859--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Pastmybest
       Date: May 16, 2025, 12:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well I've just looked at the photos and can see a sign and
       markings on the pavement so lets see the NTO and make formal
       reps
       #Post#: 71860--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Coldhands
       Date: May 16, 2025, 12:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Pastmybest link ---
       >
       > Well I've just looked at the photos and can see a sign and
       markings on the pavement so lets see the NTO and make formal
       reps
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks for the reply here. NtO is attached earlier in the
       thread.
       #Post#: 71876--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL red route - parked on footway - physical PCN
   DIR By: Pastmybest
       Date: May 16, 2025, 1:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Got it i will draft something for you tomorrow evening
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page