URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 64032--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: March 25, 2025, 5:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There are some adjudicators who won't consider the box
       non-compliant including you know who.
       Andrew Harman has upheld at least five appeals for
       non-compliance for this box.
       It is this lack of consistency that gives the tribunal a bad
       name as appeals which have solid grounds become a lottery.
       That said most of the many appeals here are only on the
       contravention, and Kingston also doesn't contest a lot.
       Some adjudicators will also look at grounds that aren't even in
       the appeal if they see something obvious/from before.
       --------
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/0Um29Zi.gif
       Case reference 2240580483
       Appellant Arunachalam vinayagaraj
       Authority Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
       VRM DN16HRL
       PCN Details
       PCN QT09983195
       Contravention date 29 Oct 2024
       Contravention time 20:36:00
       Contravention location Kingston Road
       Penalty amount GBP 130.00
       Contravention Entering and stopping in a box junction
       Referral date -
       Decision Date 24 Mar 2025
       Adjudicator Michael Burke
       Appeal decision Appeal refused
       Direction Full penalty charge notice amount stated to be paid
       within 28 days.
       Reasons The allegation in this case is entering and stopping in
       a box junction when prohibited. The Appellant does not dispute
       this. He states that the vehicle ahead indicated right very late
       and he entered the box junction to avoid a collision. He also
       asserts that the particular box junction is non-compliant in
       that it is too long. He has provided plans and photograph as
       supporting evidence.
       I have considered the Appellant’s evidence together with the
       enforcement camera evidence and I am satisfied the box junction
       was substantially compliant.
       I have considered the enforcement camera evidence on the
       Enforcement Authority's website and I am satisfied it shows a
       clear example of the contravention. The Appellant entered the
       box junction when the traffic ahead was slowing to a halt and it
       was plain he would not be able to clear the box junction without
       stopping. He appears to have realised this and stopped but by
       then it was too late as most of his vehicle was already in the
       box junction. The contravention occurs if any part of the
       vehicle has to stop in the box junction.
       Having considered all the evidence I am satisfied that the
       contravention occurred and that the PCN was properly issued and
       served. I am not satisfied that any exemption applies.
       #Post#: 64034--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: March 25, 2025, 6:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The skill lies also in what day to choose for the hearing.  ;)
       #Post#: 82690--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 25, 2025, 10:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ;D Length of the box. Decision tomorrow.
       #Post#: 82995--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: July 27, 2025, 2:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Outcome
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1s1_SCCL4shS3aCgdUnDUQPkQicBbmsx2/view.
       #Post#: 83001--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 27, 2025, 2:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A very pleasant experience. A proper discussion. There is also
       an issue with their PCN - for another day.
       #Post#: 87452--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: August 27, 2025, 10:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Update! They have reduced it. Was there today. FOIR and
       complaint sent re the plan.
  HTML https://t.co/Xx9WebQYix
       #Post#: 87889--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: August 31, 2025, 8:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Further update
       While preparing for my Radio Jackie interview on 4th September,
       I noticed that in Section J they provided full details of
       someone else's PCN including name and address.
       Macey Briggs is responsible.
       These people are paid to do a job and hold powerful positions in
       that they make people pay. This person should apologise, resign
       or move on to another outfit like a failed football manager.
       #Post#: 87890--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: August 31, 2025, 8:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Wile preparing for my Radio Jackie interview on 4th September,
       I noticed that in Section J they provided full details of
       someone else's PCN including name and address.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       This happens a lot, I normally contact the other person, explain
       what's happened, and offer to represent them as well.
       #Post#: 87891--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: August 31, 2025, 8:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I will personally drive there and do the same.  8) Be nice to
       see the Fairfield Halls again - best acoustics in the country.
       #Post#: 87933--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: September 1, 2025, 2:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://youtu.be/HZRybHyQ91I
       More Kingston incompetence.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page