URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 63999--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - Overstay within grace period - Milton
       Country Park, Cambridge
   DIR By: miltonparkingeye
       Date: March 24, 2025, 5:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Didn't mention bye laws. Complained and asked if they can
       rescind it given the time stamp from the receipt + grace period.
       #Post#: 64205--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - Overstay within grace period - Milton
       Country Park, Cambridge
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: March 26, 2025, 7:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       From the council:
       [indent]I hope the following will answer your query:
       - As far as we are aware of, these bylaws are still in effect
       - A copy of the byelaws is attached.
       - We do not hold any information or plan regarding the
       land/boundaries for Milton Country Park and there was nothing
       with the byelaws.
       [/indent]
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/Uqs4xMJ
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/Uqs4xMJ
       #Post#: 64210--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - Overstay within grace period - Milton
       Country Park, Cambridge
   DIR By: b789
       Date: March 26, 2025, 8:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The documents confirm that Milton Country Park is land under
       statutory control, specifically regulated by byelaws made under
       Section 41 of the Countryside Act 1968. These byelaws were:
       [indent]• Made by South Cambridgeshire District Council;
       • Confirmed by the Secretary of State on 5 April 1994;
       • Came into operation on 2 May 1994.[/indent]
       Key Implications:
       [indent]• The bylaws prohibit or regulate the use of vehicles
       within the park, subject to exceptions such as spaces set aside
       by the Council (see section 6).
       • Any parking enforcement regime operated within Milton Country
       Park must be consistent with these statutory byelaws.[/indent]
       As a result, Milton Country Park is not “relevant land” under
       Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, meaning:
       [indent]• The Keeper of a vehicle cannot be held liable for any
       parking charge under PoFA.
       • Only the driver at the time of the alleged incident could
       potentially be pursued, subject to other defences.[/indent]
       So, has there been any correspondence with ParkingEye by the
       Keeper where they have blabbed that they were also the driver?
       In other words, does parkingEye know that the recipient of the
       NtK was also the driver?
       If not, then you can send the following as your initial appeal.
       It will likely be rejected but they will give you a POPLA code
       and then you can send a copy of the bylaws with your POPLA
       appeal.
       Send the following appeal to ParkingEye:
       --- Quote ---
       > APPEAL FROM THE REGISTERED KEEPER
       >
       > Re: Parking Charge Notice [Insert PCN Number]
       > Vehicle Registration: [Insert VRM]
       > Date of Notice: [Insert Date]
       >
       > Dear ParkingEye,
       >
       > I am appealing the above Parking Charge Notice (PCN) as the
       Registered Keeper. Your Notice to Keeper (NtK) states that the
       keeper is liable under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012
       (PoFA). This is categorically incorrect and a serious
       misrepresentation.
       >
       > The location in question—Milton Country Park—is not “relevant
       land” under PoFA. The land is subject to statutory byelaws made
       under Section 41 of the Countryside Act 1968, confirmed by the
       Secretary of State and brought into force on 2 May 1994. These
       byelaws remain in effect and are enforceable.
       >
       > Accordingly:
       >
       > [indent]• Your NtK cannot lawfully transfer liability to the
       Registered Keeper, as PoFA Schedule 4 does not apply to land
       under statutory control.[/indent]
       >
       > By asserting otherwise, you are in clear breach of Section
       8.1.1(d) of the Private Parking Single Code of Practice
       (PPSCoP), which explicitly states:
       >
       > [indent]“The parking operator must not serve a notice which in
       its design and/or language: state the keeper is liable under the
       Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 where they cannot be held
       liable.”[/indent]
       >
       > As such, this constitutes a breach of your KADOE contract with
       the DVLA. The data accessed from the DVLA may only be used in
       accordance with the law and the Code of Practice. Since you are
       not entitled to pursue the Keeper, and the NtK misrepresents
       liability, your use of my personal data is unlawful.
       >
       > I therefore require:
       >
       > [indent]• immediate cancellation of this PCN;
       > • Written confirmation that my data will be erased from your
       systems under your obligations in data protection law;
       > • If you refuse to cancel, a POPLA code so the matter may be
       escalated.[/indent]
       >
       > If I do not receive confirmation of cancellation, I will
       escalate the matter to the DVLA and the Information
       Commissioner's Office (ICO) and lodge a formal complaint with
       the British Parking Association for breach of the PPSCoP.
       >
       > Yours faithfully,
       >
       > [Your Full Name]
       > Registered Keeper
       > [Address or email, if required]
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 64215--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - Overstay within grace period - Milton
       Country Park, Cambridge
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: March 26, 2025, 8:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As an aside, kudos to S. Cambs. council for a remarkably quick
       FOI response.
       #Post#: 68523--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - Overstay within grace period - Milton
       Country Park, Cambridge
   DIR By: Chelsblue
       Date: April 24, 2025, 3:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello, I've just received the same. My wife took our boys there
       during Easter, She paid £3.75 for 30mins  to 2hrs, spent some
       time meeting her friend, lost track of time and left. She was
       30mins over and now we have a bill of £100.00 plus £10.00 admin
       charge from our lease company. She said there was no option to
       extend  your payment either? Meaning she'd have to pay an
       additional £6.00
       Is the letter above applicable, if I was the registered owner
       and I wasn't there?
       #Post#: 68524--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - Overstay within grace period - Milton
       Country Park, Cambridge
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: April 24, 2025, 4:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please start your own post in line with our House rules
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/house-rules/
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page