DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 68151--------------------------------------------------
Re: penalty charge notice- bus lane violation
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: April 22, 2025, 4:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
For reference:
Nottingham City Council (Moving Traffic, City of Nottingham,
Consolidation Order) (No. 1) Traffic Regulation Order 2013
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y-YopVJpn4TPaIibp4oy_4WN64lohCV8/view
Nottingham City Council (Collin Street Area, Nottingham)
(Broadmarsh Improvements) (One Way Streets, Prohibitions of
Driving Movement and No Entry) Traffic Regulation Order 2018
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tN_Fq6GaxWzYT0V_dqW5snFm5i-2Mwhl/view
Nottingham City Council (Canal Street, Nottingham) (Prohibitions
of Driving – Bus Lanes) Traffic Regulation Order 2023
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WIM6llj5yvgEHG9_ed85IBCMz63UFxmT/view
Camera FOI response
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_u4k1nPMO0LjT98zkFXfY0-_F1Wbb9VU/view.
#Post#: 74255--------------------------------------------------
Re: penalty charge notice- bus lane violation
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: June 2, 2025, 3:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Outcome
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uOxxfiu47epnJgEdAahUx9jTItEbpGKw/view,<br
/>the adjudicator seems to have missed the point about some of
the
evidence uploaded to the council website, but the reality is
that if she's decided to refuse the appeal it doesn't really
matter what you say, she'll just disagree with whatever
arguments you advance.
#Post#: 74265--------------------------------------------------
Re: penalty charge notice- bus lane violation
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: June 2, 2025, 4:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
From recent cases, it seems TPT has totally removed
consideration of any cases where "procedural impropriety" is
part of the appeal. In addition, by using the "no prejudice"
argument to refuse such cases, they are actually applying
mitigation, which they are not allowed to consider. Hm..
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 2
DIR Previous Page