URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 62952--------------------------------------------------
       Open Parking – Parked on a crosshatch – University of Liverpool
       carpark”
   DIR By: mysticmerch
       Date: March 17, 2025, 2:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all long time follower first time making an account and
       posting.
       Received a parking charge notice from my works carpark managed
       by open parking in Liverpool for being parked on a cross hatch
       when the carpark was full. Bear in mind the driver comes to work
       45 mins early every day to get a space and this time it was full
       and had to park on a crosshatch. Not dangerously or in the way
       but on a crosshatch. When the driver entered the carpark they
       were charged to park in the carpark and so if they were to leave
       the carpark and park somewhere else they would be paying twice.
       That bit of backstory is just to add context as to why i am
       frustrated about the ticket. I have now received a letter from
       open parking northampton saying that the driver is invited to
       pay a £60 parking charge.
       After a bit of research open parking are a member of a trade
       body as i understand my options seem to be ignore, send them a
       letter saying i am not going to pay or appeal.
       Looking for advice as i don't want to pay the charge but i also
       don't want debt collectors coming after me or a CCJ.
       Any advise is appreciated thanks!
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 62953--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking ticket from work carpark. Open Parking 
   DIR By: G6PRK
       Date: March 17, 2025, 2:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can I suggest you read the following and adjust your thread
       accordingly:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/read-this-first-private-parking-charges-forum-guide/
       #Post#: 62964--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Open Parking – Parked on a crosshatch – University of
       Liverpool carpark”
   DIR By: G6PRK
       Date: March 17, 2025, 3:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I note you've made some changes. There is still some detail in
       there I'd be inclined to remove.
       The parking operator cannot pursue you as the keeper as the NtK
       fails to meet the requirements of PoFA - specifically:
       Paragraph 8(2)(a) - Failure to Specify the Period of Parking The
       NtK only lists a single moment in time rather than the actual
       period the vehicle was parked.
       There are probably other failures to but my brain isn't working
       and it doesn't really matter at this stage.
       Since you have missed the chance to appeal, you have two
       options:
       1. Ignore the NtK and the likely debt collection letters to
       follow
       2. Complain to the operator, including details of an appeal as
       follows:
       --- Quote ---
       > PCN No: [PCN NUMBER]
       > Vehicle Registration Mark: [VRM]
       >
       > I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking
       charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I
       will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your
       client landowner.
       >
       > As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL
       the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper
       of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even
       substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no
       admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions
       can be drawn. Open Parking has relied on contract law
       allegations of breach against the driver only.
       >
       > The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
       been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
       of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable.
       You are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and
       cancel the PCN.
       --- End Quote ---
       Any mitigating circumstances are irrelevant at this stage. And
       in your case, I don't imagine they'd get you anywhere in court
       either. The chances are it will never make it there and if they
       do, I would offer you a 99%+ chance of success if you follow the
       advice on this forum.
       Rest assured that there is no risk of a CCJ. Even if it proceeds
       to court - so long as you pay you will have no issues.
       #Post#: 63004--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Open Parking – Parked on a crosshatch – University of
       Liverpool carpark”
   DIR By: b789
       Date: March 17, 2025, 9:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That sign is incapable of forming a contract as the terms are
       illegible, even if it was in focus. You can appeal but you must
       only do so as the Keeper. They have no idea of the drivers
       identity unless you blab it to them, inadvertently or otherwise.
       You must always refer to the driver in the third person. No "I
       did tis or that". Only "the driver did this or that".
       #Post#: 63506--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Open Parking – Parked on a crosshatch – University of
       Liverpool carpark”
   DIR By: mysticmerch
       Date: March 20, 2025, 1:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you both for the replies i really appreciate you taking
       the time, its been very helpful.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1