DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 62484--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: March 14, 2025, 7:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You can't have DYL and zig-zags co-existing in the same length
of street. They've lost the plot, but it doesn't bear upon your
issue other than perhaps to suggest why the eejits think they
can pursue the registered keeper of a car for a driver's offence
5 months after the event.
#Post#: 62489--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: mkdon
Date: March 14, 2025, 8:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks
I think I'm just sticking with line about it being over 6 months
and also wrong road name provided.
#Post#: 62492--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: MrChips
Date: March 14, 2025, 8:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
5 months, not 6
#Post#: 62498--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: ManxTom
Date: March 14, 2025, 8:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: mkdon link ---
>
> I was between hot wings and nimika best food and wines
>
--- End Quote ---
So looking at the council photo you were parked just slightly in
front of where the person in the checked shirt is, level with
the zig-zag line, and you were just straddling the brick-paved
part of the pavement and the cycle lane?
HTML https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5996345,-0.0295789,3a,75y,13.49h,76.23t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1smocGhPi5unZdiV91La-CCA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D13.768419591459946%26panoid%3DmocGhPi5unZdiV91La-CCA%26yaw%3D13.48592672573566!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDMxMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
And it wasn't Guildsway...
#Post#: 62499--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: ManxTom
Date: March 14, 2025, 8:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: mkdon link ---
>
> Thanks
>
> I think I'm just sticking with line about it being over 6
months and also wrong road name provided.
>
--- End Quote ---
I think a previous poster was mistaken saying it was over 6
months. It isn't - it's over 5 months. But yes, it would seem
to be the wrong road.
[Edit: cross-posted with Mr chips]
#Post#: 62500--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: mkdon
Date: March 14, 2025, 8:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
That is correct. My car was more in front of the parcel
pickup/drop-off lockers.
As for it being 5 months and not 6, isn't this this way beyond
the 14 days they are meant to issue it?, how do they expect
anyone to know who drove car 5 months ago?,
#Post#: 62503--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: john_s_wf
Date: March 14, 2025, 8:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/neighbourhoods/3gs
FPNs seem worse than pcns. If they don't accept your appeal next
step is magistrates court and risk of "criminal conviction".
#Post#: 62505--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: mkdon
Date: March 14, 2025, 9:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: john_s_wf link ---
>
>
HTML https://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/neighbourhoods/3gs
>
> FPNs seem worse than pcns. If they don't accept your appeal
next step is magistrates court and risk of "criminal
conviction".
>
--- End Quote ---
yh they are total scumbags, atm my best defence would be wrong
road name and maybe fact its been over 5 months and thus how can
i recall who it was driving at the time.
#Post#: 62507--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: March 14, 2025, 9:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Apologies I miscounted the months.
Go with Mr Anderson's approach and lose the attitude - pavement
parking is not on and you must stop doing it.
#Post#: 62510--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham forest. Section 137 Wilful obstruction of highway
DIR By: mkdon
Date: March 14, 2025, 9:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> Apologies I miscounted the months.
>
> Go with Mr Anderson's approach and lose the attitude -
pavement parking is not on and you must stop doing it.
>
--- End Quote ---
cool, il draft up an email and share it before sending. so just
to confirm i should just stick to fact they got the road name
wrong and its been 5 months thus i cant recall who was driving?
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 5
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page