DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 69767--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: May 2, 2025, 11:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
..and is a contravention regardless on any bay markings..!
Priceless.
..and is enforceable under the LLA and TfL Act 2003.!
.....Clueless.
Just register your appeal.
Contravention did not occur.
You rely on your representations and the authority's Notice of
Rejection.
If they resist your appeal, go for a costs award in your favour
- it's a token amount but it's the principle!
#Post#: 69769--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: May 2, 2025, 11:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Sorry HCA, the council are correct about the 2003 Act, see
Section 14 but they blow themselves up with the rubbish about
the bay as 14(2)(a) covers that.
#Post#: 69776--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: May 2, 2025, 1:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/18/schedule/12
My understanding is that S14 London Local Authorities and
Transport for London Act 2003 was repealed by
HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/2053/contents/made
#Post#: 69786--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: May 2, 2025, 2:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Expect you are right, am on holiday.
#Post#: 69814--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: May 3, 2025, 3:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It's raining so back to PCNs. The repeal was deferred by SI 2008
No 757
The Traffic Management Act 2004 (Commencement No. 5 and
Transitional Provisions) (England) (Amendment) Order 2008
I can't claim credit for knowing this. Ian gave me a WestLaw
update to the 2003 Act
#Post#: 82371--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: July 23, 2025, 11:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The hearing for this was today, the PCN was cancelled. I will
post the written decision up tomorrow.
#Post#: 82400--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: Jill
Date: July 23, 2025, 2:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you mr mustard, this is the 2nd ticket you have won for
me, there’s 1 more to go it has to be a hat trick :D
#Post#: 82471--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: mrmustard
Date: July 24, 2025, 5:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Case no. 2250222887 by Mr Teper
The Appellant is represented by Mr D Dishman, the Authority did
not attend.
The Authority's case is that the Appellant's vehicle was parked
adjacent to a footway lowered to meet the level of the
carriageway when in Holbrook Road on 21 February 2025 at 10:59.
I have allowed this appeal because I find, as a fact, that the
location where the Appellant's vehicle was parked is a parking
bay. This is created by the Traffic Management Order for
Stratford South East 2010 No. 31 at item 146.
The appeal is allowed.
#Post#: 82503--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: Jill
Date: July 24, 2025, 8:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I had another PCN same parking space’s and yesssss mrmustard won
again🥊
#Post#: 82531--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2nd newham PCN
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: July 24, 2025, 11:01 am
---------------------------------------------------------
'vexatious'
denoting an action or the bringer of an action that is brought
without sufficient grounds for winning, purely to [imposes
penalties without a lawful basis]..cause annoyance
Did you ask for costs or at least a steer from the adjudicator
as to whether such a request would be entertained?
*****************************************************
Page 3 of 4
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page