DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 5318--------------------------------------------------
Re: 31J - Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: September 17, 2023, 1:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Can you please provide the PCN number & number plate? There is a
possible argument I would like to investigate.
#Post#: 5328--------------------------------------------------
Re: 31J - Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: September 17, 2023, 4:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Good luck re de minimis. :-[
#Post#: 5369--------------------------------------------------
Re: 31J - Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
DIR By: NBSCMN
Date: September 18, 2023, 4:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
ou67 nmv
MT87172065
#Post#: 5419--------------------------------------------------
Re: 31J - Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: September 18, 2023, 4:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
You'll have to submit this under "any other reason":
[indent]
Dear London Borough of Merton,
It is unclear which statutory grounds of appeal the council
believes apply to this penalty charge. While there are five
grounds listed on the PCN, when trying to make a representation
I am presented with no less than 22 grounds that don't seem to
match or overlap with the grounds on the paper PCN at all:
A friend / family member recently passed away
I am a Blue Badge holder
I did not realise I was in contravention
I have already paid the PCN
I performed the contravention due to my medical condition
I performed the contravention to avoid congestion
I was avoiding an accident
I was following a diversion
I was following my sat-nav / I was lost / I'm not from the area
I was making way for an emergency vehicle
I was not at the location on the day
I was not the driver
I was not the owner of the vehicle
I was unaware of the rules
I was unaware that a PCN had been issued as I've been away
My vehicle had broken down
My vehicle is a taxi / private hire vehicle
My vehicle was cloned
My vehicle was stolen
The owner of the vehicle has passed away
The vehicle was on hire to someone else
I have provided a screenshot of this at (link)
It would appear that either the grounds on the PCN are wrong, or
the ones on the website are wrong, or maybe they are both wrong.
In either event this does not appear to be a proper or lawful
approach and I suggest that the PCN should sort out its
processes before issuing any more PCNs.
Yours faithfully,
[/indent]
The link will redirect to
HTML https://imgur.com/a/lfZqhu3
but do not
put this link into the representation, I will email you a link
which will provide an audit trail of the number of clicks it
receives (do not click on that link yourself). If the click
count remains at zero, we'll be able to show that they've not
considered all the evidence before responding to the
representation. If they say that they've considered all the
evidence, we've got them for lying as well.
#Post#: 10311--------------------------------------------------
Re: 31J - Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
DIR By: NBSCMN
Date: November 15, 2023, 10:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi
just received my rejection.
HTML https://imgur.com/a/flOieZF
any thoughts
#Post#: 10312--------------------------------------------------
Re: 31J - Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 15, 2023, 10:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Rejection of representations against penalty charge notice
3Where any representations are made under paragraph 1 above but
the enforcing authority do not accept that a ground has been
established, the notice served under sub-paragraph (7) of the
said paragraph 1 (in this Schedule referred to as “the notice of
rejection”) must—
(a)state that a charge certificate may be served under paragraph
5 below unless before the end of the period of 28 days beginning
with the date of service of the notice of rejection—
HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/schedule/1/enacted
Plus failure to consider.
#Post#: 10315--------------------------------------------------
Re: 31J - Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: November 15, 2023, 10:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
They've opened the link:
HTML https://i.imgur.com/maq7DXn.png
However as Hippocrates points out, the NoR is hopelessly flawed,
as the timeframes are wrong. This is an almost sure win at the
tribunal and I'm happy to represent you if you wish to carry on.
#Post#: 13401--------------------------------------------------
Re: 31J - Entering and stopping in a box junction when
prohibited
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: January 6, 2024, 6:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
DNC'ed.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 2
DIR Previous Page