DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
*****************************************************
#Post#: 60634--------------------------------------------------
Two NIPs received for immediately consecutive average camera
locations
DIR By: Pipps
Date: March 5, 2025, 1:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I have received two separate NIPs, referring to images from two
pairs of average speed cameras time-stamped seven minutes apart,
on the same stretch of motorway at immediately consecutive
locations on the M1.
Would it be possible to get the second NIP struck-out?
How should I respond to both NIPs?
#Post#: 60637--------------------------------------------------
Re: Two NIPs received for immediately consecutive average camera
locations
DIR By: jfollows
Date: March 5, 2025, 3:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Reply to both NIPs correctly and attach a covering letter to
both replies requesting that the offence be considered as a
single continuous offence rather than two separate offences.
If you don’t ask, you won’t get, and the police are reasonably
tolerant of this argument.
#Post#: 60641--------------------------------------------------
Re: Two NIPs received for immediately consecutive average camera
locations
DIR By: RichardW
Date: March 5, 2025, 4:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It has a fair chance if they are the same force, but we have
seen several cases on this stretch recently where the offences
were 2 separate forces, and the request was denied. But as
jfollows says, worst that can happen is they say no, and you
have the 2 offences to deal with.
#Post#: 60644--------------------------------------------------
Re: Two NIPs received for immediately consecutive average camera
locations
DIR By: Pipps
Date: March 5, 2025, 4:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Both NIPs from Derbyshire CREST.
It seems [member=2614]DurhamDriver[/member] was successful here
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/speeding-and-other-criminal-offences/received-2-nips-on-same-journey-17-minutes-apart/msg35433/#msg35433.
I will enclose covering letters.
#Post#: 60668--------------------------------------------------
Re: Two NIPs received for immediately consecutive average camera
locations
DIR By: jfollows
Date: March 5, 2025, 5:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Send both replies together with covering letter stapled to both,
I suggest, if I wasn’t clear. Plus proof of posting from the
Post Office as usual.
#Post#: 60706--------------------------------------------------
Re: Two NIPs received for immediately consecutive average camera
locations
DIR By: Pipps
Date: March 5, 2025, 7:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I emailed Derbyshire CREST this morning and three hours later I
received a response stating that the second notice has been
cancelled!
#Post#: 60707--------------------------------------------------
Re: Two NIPs received for immediately consecutive average camera
locations
DIR By: jfollows
Date: March 5, 2025, 7:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Good result!
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1