DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Non-motoring legal advice
*****************************************************
#Post#: 60283--------------------------------------------------
Car Rental Damage Dispute
By: mdar50743 Date: March 2, 2025, 4:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Rental Agreement:
HTML https://jmp.sh/MLdk3WrS
Photos of Damage:
HTML https://jmp.sh/HNgFYagm
I recently rented a car from Hertz where I collected.
On collection, I was given a printed written list of if there
were any damages to the car where I had to go around and check
off the if there were damage with what I could see on the
vehicle. I had to do this myself and the staff did not show me
round highlighting the any damage. There wasn’t any damage I
could see and I was in a rush as I needed the car for work.
However, naively I did not take any photos at the time of
collection. I have one photo of the vehicle taken one hour after
collection where you can just about make out the car.
When I dropped the vehicle off the branch highlighted damage
which they believed had not been recorded before. They produced
photos of the vehicle which were not shown to me via email. The
collection manager of the branch did not inspect the car with me
and told me to close the rental and leave the keys. I did not
sign any signature to accept any liability to this damage.
The description of the damage is a duplicate from the when I was
originally given. I accept minor scratches and scuffs but not to
the extent they have claimed.
I want to contest on two points. Firstly, I did not damage the
vehicle to the extent they are claiming. Secondly, they have
presented me with different/new evidence from what I was given
on collection. I believe being made to sign against a written
list of damages but then being held to account against photo
evidence is a manipulation.
I'd welcome any thoughts or advice on how to tackle this.
*****************************************************