DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 63605--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: marxman
Date: March 21, 2025, 7:56 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hiya,
so I received a new mail from DCB-Legal.
The DPO from TPS has indicated to not update the address on
their end.
They also linked this judgement:
HTML https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2013-0280
[attachment deleted by admin]
#Post#: 63638--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: b789
Date: March 21, 2025, 11:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: marxman link ---
>
>
> The DPO from TPS has indicated to not update the address on
their end.
>
--- End Quote ---
What on earth does that mean? Either explain clearly what
response you had from TPS or show it to us!
TPS cannot simply "indicate to not update the address on their
end"!
As for DCBL, you can completely ignore anything you get from
them or any other debt recovery agent. Ignore, ignore, ignore!
They are powerless to do anything except to try and scare the
low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree into paying out of
ignorance and fear. Anything you receive from this shower of
bottom-dwelling scammers cn be safely shredded and used as
Hamster bedding.
We do not need to know about any useless debt recovery rubbish
you may receive.
However, please explain or show us the response you have had
from TPS.
#Post#: 63641--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: marxman
Date: March 21, 2025, 11:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi [member=26]b789[/member],
Thanks for your response.
Could you please refer to the two messages above my last
message? That's the conversation I had with the TPS.
link:
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/dcbl-parking-charge-nightmare-wrong-address-escalated-fee!/msg60342/#msg60342
Please let me know if you need anything further about this.
Kind regards.
#Post#: 63660--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: b789
Date: March 21, 2025, 12:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
1. Duty to Update Personal Data (Article 5(1)(d))
Under UK GDPR Article 5(1)(d), data must be accurate and, where
necessary, kept up to date. You have now informed them of a new
address for service, and they are obliged to update their
records accordingly. Their obligation to retain a historical
address for audit or evidential purposes (e.g. why the PCN was
sent there) does not override your right to have your current
address used for ongoing or future correspondence.
2. Right to Rectification (Article 16)
Article 16 gives you the right to have inaccurate personal data
rectified and, where applicable, to have incomplete data
completed. Their refusal to update your address on the basis
that they used the V5C address at the time of the event is
irrelevant to ongoing or future processing. They are now
processing the data for debt recovery, and must use your
up-to-date address.
3. Erasure of Old Address (Article 17)
You requested erasure of the old address, which can be justified
under Article 17(1)(c) where the data is no longer necessary for
the purpose for which it was collected. If they argue it is
still necessary (e.g. for evidential purposes), they must retain
it securely but must not use it for service or further
correspondence. That would be a misuse of out-of-date personal
data.
4. Legitimate Interests (Article 6(1)(f))
While they may rely on legitimate interests for processing, this
does not negate your rights under Articles 16 and 17, nor does
it excuse them from complying with your rectification request.
5. Misuse of Address for Service
Continuing to send letters or legal proceedings to the outdated
address, despite being notified of the current one, would
constitute unreasonable behaviour under the Civil Procedure
Rules and also has Data Protection implications.
Respond to that letter/email you received with the following:
--- Quote ---
> Subject: Data Rectification Under UK GDPR – Notice of Formal
Non-Compliance
>
> Dear Data Compliance Team,
>
> I write further to your response regarding my data
rectification request, and I must express serious concern at
your apparent failure to understand your legal obligations under
the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). Your
refusal to update your records with my current address, or to
mark my previous address as obsolete, is both legally and
procedurally unacceptable.
>
> Let me be clear: you have now been formally notified of my
current address for service. Continuing to process my personal
data using an outdated address – including passing it to third
parties – is a breach of your obligation under Article 5(1)(d)
and Article 16 of the UK GDPR, which require personal data to be
accurate, kept up to date, and rectified without delay.
Continued use of an outdated address, despite formal notice, may
constitute a misuse of my personal data and could be deemed
unreasonable behaviour under the Civil Procedure Rules in the
event of any legal proceedings.
>
> Your reference to Article 6(1)(b) and (f) is entirely
misplaced. The lawful basis for processing personal data does
not exempt you from compliance with the data subject’s right to
rectification or erasure where applicable. The fact that you
obtained my previous address via the DVLA does not give you a
perpetual right to rely on it once you have been notified it is
no longer valid for service.
>
> Your refusal to erase or mark the old address as obsolete also
breaches Article 17(1)(c), as that data is no longer necessary
for the purposes for which it was originally collected. While
you may retain the historic address internally for evidential
purposes, it must not be used for further correspondence or
shared with third parties.
>
> If this letter is received by someone who still cannot grasp
your obligations under data protection law, I insist it be
immediately passed to someone within your organisation who has
the required competence and authority to respond appropriately.
This is not a matter of discretion or internal policy – it is a
matter of statutory compliance.
>
> I also take this opportunity to make my position regarding
DCBL or any other so-called ‘debt recovery’ agent entirely
clear. I will not be engaging with them under any circumstances.
I am well aware that they are not a party to any alleged
contract, have no lawful authority in this matter, and serve
merely as data processors acting under your instruction. As the
data controller, you remain uniquely and solely responsible for
the processing of my personal data, including any transmission
to third parties.
>
> Accordingly, you are now formally required to:
>
> [indent]1. Update your records with my current address for
service and confirm in writing that this will be used for all
future correspondence, including communications issued by your
agents or legal representatives.
>
> 2. Confirm that the previous address has been erased or
permanently marked as obsolete, and that it will not be used
again for any form of contact or processing.
>
> 3. Acknowledge your full accountability as data controller for
all data sharing to date and confirm that my current address has
been provided to any third parties who were previously given the
outdated information.[/indent]
>
> If you fail to act on this request within 14 days, I will
escalate the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office
(ICO). I also reserve the right to pursue all available legal
remedies, including seeking damages or costs where misuse of
data or procedural abuse occurs.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> [Your Full Name]
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 63673--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: March 21, 2025, 3:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
OP, IMO all you need to do is to get them to confirm that they
will use your notified address for future correspondence. This
doesn't need reams of writing.
You also need to submit a Subject Access Request to the creditor
to get to the nub of the substantive issue: what is it the
driver's alleged to have done and what notices have been sent to
you? You need copies of these.
I also suggest you amend your posts to remove reference to who
was the driver.
#Post#: 63800--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: marxman
Date: March 23, 2025, 8:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
hi, I've sent the SAR to them. Regarding original post, I do not
have the rights to modify I believe; could you please help me
out?
#Post#: 63880--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: March 23, 2025, 4:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If you want your opening post changing, send me a direct message
of what you want it changing to and I'll do the honours.
#Post#: 67803--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: marxman
Date: April 19, 2025, 4:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi Guys,
I received a new mail from DCBL today. I'll ignore this. Just
adding this here for the record.
However, I sent the email to the DPO@TPS and they have
acknowledged the change on their system (apparently).
And, regarding SAR: is that the comment from b789 [on March 21,
2025, 05:44:52
pm](
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/dcbl-parking-charge-nightmare-wrong-address-escalated-fee!/msg63660/#msg63660)<br
/>? I've sent this to the DPO@TPS.
If that's not the SAR (subject access request) could you please
tell me who to send it to? (DCBL or TPS)?
Kind regards.
[attachment deleted by admin]
#Post#: 67809--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: Charitynjw
Date: April 19, 2025, 9:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: marxman link ---
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I received a new mail from DCBL today. I'll ignore this. Just
adding this here for the record.
>
> However, I sent the email to the DPO@TPS and they have
acknowledged the change on their system (apparently).
> And, regarding SAR: is that the comment from b789 [on March
21, 2025, 05:44:52
pm](
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/dcbl-parking-charge-nightmare-wrong-address-escalated-fee!/msg63660/#msg63660)<br
/>? I've sent this to the DPO@TPS.
>
> If that's not the SAR (subject access request) could you
please tell me who to send it to? (DCBL or TPS)?
>
> Kind regards.
>
--- End Quote ---
For clarity, was this recent DCBL
̷s̷c̷a̷m̷.̷ letter sent to your
current address?
#Post#: 67817--------------------------------------------------
Re: DCBL Parking Charge Nightmare: Wrong Address & Escalated
Fee!
DIR By: b789
Date: April 20, 2025, 12:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The only party that you need to be concerned about is TPS. If
you sent the DRN to the TPS DPO and they have acknowledged it,
then what else are you worrying about?
You’ve been advised that you can safely ignore anything from
DCBL, so why are you even mentioning them? Ignore DCBL.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 3
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page