DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 64999--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: Jamran
Date: March 31, 2025, 10:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
>
> What was your challenge. The rejection is just a template.
>
>
HTML https://i.imgur.com/X3tjSTM.jpeg
>
--- End Quote ---
Essentially what you advised. Explained the whole confusion and
also the fact that the 3 hours hadn’t elapsed etc.
#Post#: 65706--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: Jamran
Date: April 4, 2025, 8:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Any issues with the response? Do I have chance at NTO or even
with with adjudicator?
#Post#: 65740--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: April 5, 2025, 5:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Responses to informal reps count for little in the grand scheme
of things IMO.
Here's the legal bit:
.....
(2) An order to which this regulation applies shall include an
exemption from the prohibition in accordance with whichever of
paragraphs (3) and (4) is appropriate in favour of any vehicle
displaying a disabled person’s badge in the relevant position.
(3) Where the period of the prohibition does not exceed 3 hours
the exemption shall be for the whole of that period.
(4) Where the period of the prohibition exceeds 3 hours [as
here]the exemption shall be for a period of 3 hours subject to
the conditions that–
(a)the period of exempted waiting does not begin less than one
hour after a previous period of exempted waiting by the same
vehicle in the same road on the same day;
(b)a parking disc is displayed in the relevant position on the
vehicle marked to show the quarter hour period during which the
period of exempted waiting began.
Whether the council have transposed this into their traffic
orders correctly, who knows? But if they have then there is no
exemption simply based upon how long you've parked and by what
means this could be proved, the law requires the 'parking disc'
AKA clock to be displayed.
#Post#: 70561--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: Jamran
Date: May 8, 2025, 10:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Just received the NTO
HTML https://share.icloud.com/photos/0592nJ44K8mXE_h8bivCOnZGw
#Post#: 71163--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: Jamran
Date: May 12, 2025, 8:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Can anyone advise on their response please?
#Post#: 71198--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: May 13, 2025, 5:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
As you're at Notice to Owner stage, the discount has gone, so
submit your original reps, but this time updated to reflect what
they said in their response to the informal reps. They may
reoffer the discount in their response, but if they don't it's
then a total no-brainer to register an appeal with London
Tribunals.
#Post#: 78838--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: Jamran
Date: June 30, 2025, 3:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Just received a notice of rejection from TH. Sadly, they showed
no discretion and did not cancel the PCN. Additionally, they
made baseless accusations of the badge being misused by myself
even though the blue badge was with me!
Any help would be appreciated on whether I should progress with
adjudication as they’ve reoffered the discount. Thanks
HTML https://share.icloud.com/photos/022lr5GB-SxdrBlVZMxairo0A
#Post#: 78839--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: Jamran
Date: June 30, 2025, 3:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
>
> As you're at Notice to Owner stage, the discount has gone, so
submit your original reps, but this time updated to reflect what
they said in their response to the informal reps. They may
reoffer the discount in their response, but if they don't it's
then a total no-brainer to register an appeal with London
Tribunals.
>
--- End Quote ---
They’ve reoffered the discount.
#Post#: 78993--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: Jamran
Date: June 30, 2025, 10:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If someone could provide some input it would be appreciated
#Post#: 79007--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets PCN Brady St code 01
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: July 1, 2025, 3:55 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Please post their letter of rejection to the NtO
Their letter seems to be tosh on the subject of the Blue Badge.
A Blue Badge holder may not be able to drive, but provided the
car was used to convey the BB holder to the parking location,
then that is OK. If you can explain more about this, then it
might be worth taking them to London Tribunals, otherwise pay
the discount. They are correct re the clock, I think.
My elderly mother held a BB and I used to use it when we took
her out and parked, then returned to the car and took her home.
This is entirely lawful.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 9
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page