URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 59580--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dagenham, Contravention Code 40 in own Disabled Bay
   DIR By: Enceladus
       Date: February 24, 2025, 8:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Apparently LBBD have a courtesy virtual Blue Badge scheme
  HTML https://www.lbbd.gov.uk/parking/parking-permits/courtesy-blue-badge.<br
       />So no physical BB required within the home controlled parking
       zone, provided the car is registered for the scheme. One car
       only per BB.
       Is there a virtual BB registered to your car?
       #Post#: 59597--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dagenham, Contravention Code 40 in own Disabled Bay
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: February 25, 2025, 4:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Reps should be on lines of:
       - Contravention did not occur.
       - Council kindly painted a disabled bay for us in xxxx but our
       understanding is this is courtesy bay and has no legal standing
       - We don't usually display my blue badge because (not
       necessary?)
       - Appreciate if council will confirm the status of the bay and
       instruct CEOs accordingly
       - As PCN issued in error, look forward to cancellation.
       #Post#: 59676--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dagenham, Contravention Code 40 in own Disabled Bay
   DIR By: mohmmad786
       Date: February 25, 2025, 11:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       First of all, thank you very much for helping us fight this PCN.
       You don't know how much we appreaciate your help.
       mrmustard, Thank you very much for the offer sir. I have taken
       all the information from this thread and used the AI to make a
       draft. If you feel that we have missed out on anything or we
       need to amend the appeal then please let us know.
       Dear Sir/Madam,
       I am writing to formally challenge the above Penalty Charge
       Notice (PCN) on the following grounds:
       1. Non-Enforceability of the Bay
       The disabled bay in question, installed by the council on my
       application [insert number of years] years ago, is a courtesy
       bay. It is marked with “DISABLED” on part of the carriageway and
       footway; however, it lacks a formal Traffic Management Order
       (TMO) and the legally required upright signage. As a courtesy
       bay, it holds no legal enforceability. Therefore, the alleged
       contravention – for not displaying a Blue Badge – did not occur.
       2. Legitimate Expectation Based on Long-Standing Practice
       For at least the past 10 years, I have parked my vehicle in this
       bay without displaying my Blue Badge. Throughout this period,
       the council has never taken any enforcement action against this
       practice, creating a legitimate expectation that non-display in
       this location is tolerated. The issuance of this PCN without
       prior notice or a change in the established local practice is
       both unfair and inconsistent with past experience.
       3. Inadequate Notice of a Change in Enforcement Policy
       I always display my Blue Badge in areas where it is required.
       However, because this bay has historically been treated as a
       courtesy bay, I have not found it necessary to display the badge
       here. Had there been an intention to enforce the requirement for
       visible display in this bay, proper notification should have
       been provided to residents. It appears that a change in
       enforcement policy – potentially due to a new CEO or revised
       local practices – has not been communicated in advance.
       4. Erroneous Evidence Submitted by the Enforcement Officer
       I note that the enforcement officer has included a photograph in
       the PCN evidence which shows a “DISABLED” sign. I wish to
       clarify that this sign is one that I purchased from eBay for the
       purpose of politely reminding our neighbours that “NO PARKING,
       disabled resident need this space at all times.” It is not an
       official council sign and has no legal standing. The inclusion
       of this image suggests that the officer may lack proper training
       or understanding of the official signage used by the council.
       This erroneous evidence further supports my position that the
       PCN has been issued in error.
       Request for Confirmation
       In light of the above points, I respectfully request that you:
       Confirm that the bay is classified as a courtesy bay and, as
       such, is not legally enforceable.
       Instruct enforcement officers accordingly to reflect this
       long-established local practice.
       Cancel the PCN as it has been issued erroneously.
       I appreciate the benefit this bay provides to my family and me
       and would welcome confirmation as to whether the council has
       amended its enforcement policy. In the meantime, I shall display
       my Blue Badge when parking at this location, although I maintain
       that this PCN is invalid given the circumstances.
       Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I look
       forward to receiving your confirmation of cancellation.
       Yours faithfully,
       What do you guys think?
       Once again, thank you very much for your help. <3
       #Post#: 59678--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dagenham, Contravention Code 40 in own Disabled Bay
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: February 25, 2025, 12:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       In my view you don't need anymore than point 1, adding that the
       council kindly painted the courtesy bay for you and you put up a
       sign bought on eBay...
       Point 2 makes no sense - you can't have legitimate expectation
       of a condition that doesn't exist, and neither does point 3,
       likewise.
       It's just a mistake by the CEO.
       This is an informal challenge at this stage.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page