URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 29073--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Code 622- Parking on footpath
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: July 8, 2024, 5:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For convenience:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/8g240Gc/Havering-1.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/YB8T3JZ
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/WxvPTVY/Havering-2.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/SswdLf9
       #Post#: 29076--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Code 622- Parking on footpath
   DIR By: mogul87
       Date: July 8, 2024, 5:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: londondriver11 link ---
       >
       > Hi,
       >
       > I have now received the following from Havering, they didn't
       issue the re-offer the discounted amount.  I wanted to ask that
       I was to appeal and loose then the change would be 130£ ?
       >
       >
  HTML https://ibb.co/YB8T3JZ
       >
  HTML https://ibb.co/SswdLf9
       >
       > Thanks
       > Puneet
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       yes there is no cost to go to tribunal and amount will still be
       130 if you lose
       #Post#: 29089--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Code 622- Parking on footpath
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 8, 2024, 7:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I see their letter is in error as it says the amount outstanding
       is £204.  This is incorrect, because TEC have cancelled the OfR
       and Charge Certificate.
       It is now a no-brainer to take them to London Tribunals.  I
       would also put that letter forward as a procedural impropriety
       by quoting the incorrect amount. What muppets !
       #Post#: 29100--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Code 622- Parking on footpath
   DIR By: Grant Urismo
       Date: July 8, 2024, 8:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As Incandescent says, get this in front of an adjudicator. Not
       only are you highly likely to win, you'll also get to enjoy the
       adjudicator's comments on a letter that threatens to raise £204
       by 50% to make £195.
       #Post#: 29105--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Code 622- Parking on footpath
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: July 8, 2024, 8:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       With respect, I suggest the OP stick to procedure:
       (4).
       (2) A witness statement must state one and only one of the
       following—
       (a)that P did not receive the enforcement notice;
       (b)that P made representations to the enforcement authority
       under regulation 5 of the 2022 Appeals Regulations but a notice
       of rejection was not received from that authority in accordance
       with regulation 6 of those Regulations;
       (Regulation 23:
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2022/71/regulation/23/made)
       It is not for you to do anything, it's the authority's duty, so
       let them get on with it.
       NB. 'not received', not 'not issued'. You have already signed a
       statement of truth to this effect. Assuming the adjudicator is
       notified by the council then it's within their power to direct
       that you provide a copy of your reps - one of the oddest
       procedural steps because the authority have already acknowledged
       receipt and not disregarded, but hey-ho, nothing's perfect!
       #Post#: 29116--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Code 622- Parking on footpath
   DIR By: londondriver11
       Date: July 8, 2024, 10:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       Based on the last comment do I not go ahead and appeal in 28
       days on the London tribunal website that I made representations
       but a notice of rejection was not received from that authority ?
       I understand I had done this previously but would the
       adjudicator not need something from my side to make a decision.
       Thanks
       #Post#: 29149--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Code 622- Parking on footpath
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: July 8, 2024, 2:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What you've been sent is a COPY, it has no legal effect as
       regards procedure.
       The council's duty is clear.
       #Post#: 29184--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Code 622- Parking on footpath
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: July 8, 2024, 5:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=566]londondriver11[/member] I would tackle this head on,
       at this point you have nothing to lose. I will drop you a PM in
       case you'd like me to represent you.
       #Post#: 36375--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Code 622- Parking on footpath
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: September 10, 2024, 1:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > What you've been sent is a COPY, it has no legal effect as
       regards procedure.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Well we ignored your suggestion and filed an appeal against this
       further NoR, outcome here
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fj9tuC1kPsfm9diNz8jJhwsEaIV0MaDh/view.
       While technically the council should refer the case to the
       adjudicator, it would be really silly to make an issue about
       procedure when there's an easy and straightforward way to get a
       PCN cancelled. Our objective here is to further the interests of
       those who seek our help, rather than to sit on a high horse
       saying "them's the rules".
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 3
   DIR Previous Page