URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 59893--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: b789
       Date: February 27, 2025, 10:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just respond with the following:
       --- Quote ---
       > Subject: Formal Response to Appeal Rejection – Request for
       POPLA Code
       >
       > Dear ParkingEye,
       >
       > I refer to your recent response regarding my appeal against
       Parking Charge Notice [PCN Reference Number]. Your letter
       falsely claims that I have stated I was not the driver, which is
       entirely untrue. Nowhere in my appeal did I make such a
       statement.
       >
       > Furthermore, your response attempts to mislead me into
       believing I am legally obligated to name the driver. As you are
       well aware, there is no legal obligation on the registered
       keeper to do so. Your insistence that I provide such
       information, coupled with your distortion of my appeal, is
       deeply concerning and will be reported to the DVLA as a
       potential breach of your KADOE contract.
       >
       > Regarding PoFA compliance, simply quoting PoFA 9(2)(b) does
       not rectify the fundamental failure of your NtK to meet all the
       conditions required under Schedule 4. In particular, your NtK
       fails to comply with PoFA 9(2)(e)(i), as it does not include the
       required invitation for the Keeper to pay the charge. Instead,
       it states that only the driver is liable and directs the Keeper
       to pass on the notice. Given that there is no legal requirement
       for the Keeper to identify the driver, your letter is misleading
       and appears to be an attempt to intimidate me into providing
       information I am under no obligation to disclose to an
       unregulated private parking company.
       >
       > I now require you to either cancel this PCN or provide me with
       a POPLA code to escalate this matter to independent
       adjudication. Should you refuse or continue to misrepresent your
       position, I will have no hesitation in reporting your conduct to
       the DVLA, BPA, and ICO for misleading communications and
       potential data protection breaches.
       >
       > Yours sincerely,
       >
       > [Your Name]
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 59911--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: February 27, 2025, 2:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The NTK merely notifies(or should notify) the keeper, in
       accordance with PoFA, that they may be held liable for the
       driver's liability. You cannot require the creditor to cancel
       this parking charge ('cancel the PCN') simply because the NTK
       does not comply with PoFA, the parking charge at its heart is a
       matter between the creditor and the driver. As keeper, the limit
       of your appeal is that the creditor may not hold you liable.
       They may still pursue the driver because this has nothing to do
       with the keeper as such.
       #Post#: 59912--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: Cosmos2000
       Date: February 27, 2025, 2:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi
       I have sent the responce for second appeal appeal to their
       fishing mail.
       What are the chances of the proceeding to POPLA. Would Parkey
       Eye continue fishing and increase the PCN or allow the reduced
       amount.
       #Post#: 59919--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: February 27, 2025, 3:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > You cannot require the creditor to cancel this parking charge
       ('cancel the PCN') simply because the NTK does not comply with
       PoFA
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The suggested appeal does not require that. It requires them to
       either cancel the parking charge or issue a POPLA code, which,
       given that ParkingEye don't know who was driving, are the only
       two options they can realistically take.
       --- Quote ---
       > What are the chances of the proceeding to POPLA.
       --- End Quote ---
       High. There's no money to be made out of accepting appeals.
       #Post#: 59946--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: February 28, 2025, 4:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The draft I read stated: 'I now require you to either cancel
       this PCN or provide me with a POPLA code...'
       But IMO the NTK is not a demand for money, it's (or should be)
       advice and information(9(2)(b),(c) and (d)), an
       invitation(9(3)(e)) and notification about prospective
       rights(9(2)(f)). I don't see how this can be 'cancelled' because
       it's a requirement of PoFA.
       People often confuse a PCN - which is not referred to in PoFA-
       with 'parking charge', which is.
       #Post#: 59948--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: February 28, 2025, 4:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm not sure that nit-picking the difference between a parking
       charge, and a parking charge notice (the latter simply being
       notice of the former) is of much material benefit to the OP or
       their course of action, and therefore what you are getting at
       with your point.
       Let's focus on helping the OP rather than debating which one of
       us has the most technically correct interpretations of the
       relevant terms.
       #Post#: 63233--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: Cosmos2000
       Date: March 19, 2025, 9:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello,
       I have today received the below via email declining my appeal,
       would welcome any support.
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/CCma4Vt
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/CCma4Vt
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 63254--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: b789
       Date: March 19, 2025, 10:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       DO a forum search for POPLA appeals to get an idea of how to
       present one.
       #Post#: 63279--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: Cosmos2000
       Date: March 19, 2025, 1:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The dont apprear to have provided a POPLA reference,   think it
       may be eaiser to settle at the reduced price.
       #Post#: 63280--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parking Eye PCN
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: March 19, 2025, 2:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is there not one above where it says "Dear Sir/madam"? That's
       often where they put the code.
       If they haven't provided one, you should urgently email to
       demand one.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page