URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 4730--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: Southpaw82
       Date: September 10, 2023, 7:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The fact that you keep on saying 127 when I pointed out that
       it’s 172 is oddly grating on me.
       #Post#: 4740--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: mooney11
       Date: September 10, 2023, 8:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ah ha! I don't know how I've got into the habit of typing it
       that way! But... Really? I'm here worried if I'm facing another
       6 month disqualification and we're focussing on me mixing up two
       numbers that make no difference to the understanding of my
       question.
       Now that we've established I'm a muppet... Are you able to help?
       #Post#: 4754--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: slapdash
       Date: September 10, 2023, 10:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A second totting ban is for 12 months I believe.
       #Post#: 4756--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: September 10, 2023, 10:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: slapdash link ---
       >
       > A second totting ban is for 12 months I believe.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Which would be quite unjust.
       It seems the OP has been concurrently conducting two threads on
       the same issue here and on Pepipoo which I'd failed to notice:
  HTML http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=148851
       His situation is not straightforward and it seems I managed to
       grasp it correctly in post #108 on Pepipoo:
       - 2 x s172 convictions. Six points each, six months totting up
       ban (all of which you were not aware of).
       - After those convictions, 2 x speeding convictions. Three
       points each (of which you were aware).
       - Current situation: ban ended, six points on your licence. You
       want to perform a Stat Dec to have the s172 convictions set
       aside and you hope to be able to do a "deal" to have them
       dropped in exchange for a guilty plea to the underlying speeding
       offences. You have been provided with the original SJPNs for
       those two incidents and are awaiting a hearing to do the SDs and
       request your "deal."
       #Post#: 4763--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: mooney11
       Date: September 10, 2023, 11:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > It seems the OP has been concurrently conducting two threads
       on the same issue here and on Pepipoo which I'd failed to
       notice:
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       In the month and a half that had elapsed since I'd last posted
       on the other forum/thread, this new forum had popped up. I
       didn't know to what extent the old forum was still in use and at
       the time I couldn't locate my thread in the Speeding sub-forum
       or from my profile so posted here. I found it the old thread
       after having posted on here via a Google search.
       I figured there's no harm in being on both given it might
       improve the chances of being responded to.
       #Post#: 4774--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: September 10, 2023, 12:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: mooney11 link ---
       >
       > I figured there's no harm in being on both given it might
       improve the chances of being responded to.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Indeed not. I wasn't moaning!  8)
       I was simply keeping people on here appraised of our exchanges
       in Pepipoo.
       Perhaps we'll stick to this forum as there seems to be more
       engagement with your problem.
       #Post#: 4781--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: mooney11
       Date: September 10, 2023, 12:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Happy to stick to this forum! Pulling my Q's over:
       1. Am I definitely unable to withdraw the SD/SJP at this stage?
       Generic Google searches suggest that withdrawing from SJP is
       very difficult (but not necessarily impossible). Given how long
       it took to perform/be sent the SD forms and the ban being served
       (+ the unusual SD+SJP's being sent together at the same time),
       would I really have no way to drop the matter at this stage?
       Seems odd there wouldn't be some kind of eject button if
       circumstances have changed from the time a person was referred
       for a SD to the point at which they either get to perform it
       and/or a new trial takes place.
       2. Can I be dual convicted of both the S172's and the underlying
       offences? If not, then would one option be to plead guilty to
       the original s172's (assuming no further punishment could be
       enforced given I've already served the ban for them) rendering
       the underlying offences obsolete? (if in fact they would be
       obsolete).
       Of course the ideal situation is I proceed as planned, explain
       (with the help of the LA) what the situation is and the
       magistrates agree that I'm not to be banned again (and then I
       deal with the DVLA separately to the extent necessary). Am I not
       left hoping that everyone understand the situation and agrees to
       proceed with common sense rather than there being something in
       law I can point to for this unusual circumstance? I suppose the
       counter would be that this gets thrashed out before the
       proceedings begin so would have some idea of the position of the
       prosecution maybe beforehand?
       #Post#: 4787--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: September 10, 2023, 1:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: mooney11 link ---
       >
       > Happy to stick to this forum! Pulling my Q's over:
       >
       > 1. Am I definitely unable to withdraw the SD/SJP at this
       stage?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       As I said, I don't understand why you have been sent the SJPNs.
       The allegations to which they refer have already been dealt
       with. These resulted in your 2 x s172 convictions. I cannot
       realistically see how they can try these matters again unless
       you perform an SD. If they mention both s172 and speeding, you
       have been convicted of the s172 charges and the speeding
       prosecutions cannot succeed as they have no evidence that you
       were driving (this is the "leverage" you have when you offer to
       do your deal).
       --- Quote from: mooney11 link ---
       >
       > 2. Can I be dual convicted of both the S172's and the
       underlying offences? If not, then would one option be to plead
       guilty to the original s172's (assuming no further punishment
       could be enforced given I've already served the ban for them)
       rendering the underlying offences obsolete? (if in fact they
       would be obsolete).
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You can only be convicted of speeding if you provide some
       evidence that you were driving. Without it the prosecution
       cannot succeed. The underlying offences are therefore all but
       obsolete.
       --- Quote from: mooney11 link ---
       >
       > Of course the ideal situation is I proceed as planned, explain
       (with the help of the LA) what the situation is and the
       magistrates agree that I'm not to be banned again (and then I
       deal with the DVLA separately to the extent necessary). Am I not
       left hoping that everyone understand the situation and agrees to
       proceed with common sense rather than there being something in
       law I can point to for this unusual circumstance? I suppose the
       counter would be that this gets thrashed out before the
       proceedings begin so would have some idea of the position of the
       prosecution maybe beforehand?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The law cannot deal with every eventuality and I cannot see how
       it can deal with your situation. This means some discretion (and
       possibly common sense) is required. Nothing is guaranteed, of
       course. But I suggest you request a personal appearance so that
       you can discuss these matters before they come before the
       Magistrates.
       Of course if your deal is declined (to essentially swap the s172
       convictions for speeding) then you know where you stand. You
       simply decline to perform your SD, the s172 convictions remain,
       you have been sentenced for them and already served your ban.
       Unfortunately you are stuck with the MS90 endorsements and the
       six points for the other two speeding offences. But you will be
       no worse off than you are now.
       #Post#: 4802--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: mooney11
       Date: September 10, 2023, 3:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks, that super helpful and makes sense.
       I think one point I'm maybe confused about is the "perform" part
       of the SD. All I've done is sent the completed SD forms back via
       email. Is that considered to be "performed", or does that only
       occur in person? I was under the impression that performing an
       SD was something that had to be done in person, given that they
       told me back in March that I'd be given a date to do it. I ask
       because if the SD hasn't technically been performed then maybe I
       could withdraw it (I'm not expecting you to know whether I could
       actually withdraw it; I'm just giving my thought process in case
       Andy_Foster gets upset again).
       #Post#: 4803--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Points still on licence after a ban. Is this right?
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: September 10, 2023, 3:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       During the pandemic some courts were accepting SDs by phone (for
       obvious reasons).
       As far as I know, all courts have now resumed normal service and
       that means an SD must be "sworn" in person, under oath.
       The form you have completed provides details of the reasons you
       want to make the SD and contains the statement you will make
       orally when you swear your SD. So you don't need to withdraw it
       as it hasn't yet been made. You can let the court know that you
       no longer wish to make it, however.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 6
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page