URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 56913--------------------------------------------------
       Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: JLA
       Date: February 6, 2025, 8:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Received this parking charge from Horizon for overstaying at
       Tesco Brent Cross car park at 1am. The driver pulled into there
       after coming off of the M1 as they felt really tired and just
       wanted to rest up for a bit, they really had no idea there were
       any restrictions on time allowed and didn't notice any signs
       relating to that. As I said they were really tired and just
       wanted to take a break from driving and it just seems a bit
       harsh getting a ticket for stopping for a while in an empty car
       park at 1am!
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/Txnnh74X/20250206-134428.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/3988hjpX
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/3Yr2jPQD/20250206-134925.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/gFjNfch5
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/Cjsp0Wb/20250206-134726.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/z3HWfNX
       #Post#: 56931--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: b789
       Date: February 6, 2025, 9:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ha! No one pays a penny to the eejits at Horizon. Easy one to
       deal with... as long as the unknown drivers identity is not
       revealed. There is no legal obligation on the known keeper (the
       recipient of the Notice to Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity
       of the unknown driver and no inference or assumptions can be
       made.
       The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which
       means that if the unknown driver is not identified, they cannot
       transfer liability for the charge from the unknown driver to the
       known keeper.
       Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove
       anything from it:
       --- Quote ---
       > I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking
       charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I
       will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your
       client landowner.
       >
       > As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL
       the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper
       of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even
       substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no
       admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions
       can be drawn. Horizon has relied on contract law allegations of
       breach against the driver only.
       >
       > The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
       been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
       of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable.
       Horizon have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both
       a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 57072--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: JLA
       Date: February 7, 2025, 6:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you for your reply, I'm sorry if i sound a bit stupid but
       how is it non compliant with POFA, I've tried figuring it out
       from reading other threads on here but I'm quite confused by it
       all.
       #Post#: 57092--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: b789
       Date: February 7, 2025, 9:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Have a read of PoFA 9(2)(f) and then have a read on the back of
       the NtK and do the maths.
       Compare the wording on the NtK vs PoFA 9(2)(f):
       What the NtK states:
       [indent]"You are advised that if after the period of 28 days
       from the second working day after the date of this Parking
       Charge, the amount due has not been paid in full and we do not
       know both the name and current address of the driver, we have
       the right to recover any unpaid part of the parking charge from
       you."[/indent]
       What PoFA 9(2)(f) actually states:
       [indent]"The notice must warn the keeper that if, after the
       period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the
       notice is given—
       [indent](a) the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified
       under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and
       (b) the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a
       current address for service for the driver,[/indent]
       the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this
       Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so
       much of that parking charge as remains unpaid."[/indent]
       Under Paragraph 9(6) of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms
       Act 2012 (PoFA):
       [indent]“A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the
       contrary is proved, to have been GIVEN on the second working day
       after the day on which it is posted.”
       Now do the maths:
       PoFA 9(2)(f) Requirement:
       [indent]• The 28-day period starts from the day after the notice
       is given.
       • NtK deemed given (delivered): Thursday, 30th January 2025.
       • PoFA 28-day period starts: Friday, 31st January 2025.
       • PoFA deadline for Keeper liability: Friday, 28th February
       2025.[/indent]
       NtK Wording:
       [indent] The NtK states that the 28-day period starts "from the
       second working day after the date of this Parking Charge".
       • NtK issue date: Tuesday, 28th January 2025.
       • Second working day after issue date: Thursday, 30th January
       2025.
       • NtK-stated 28-day period starts: Thursday, 30th January 2025.
       • NtK-stated deadline for Keeper liability: Thursday, 27th
       February 2025.[/indent]
       So, PoFA 9(2)(f) correct deadline: Friday, 28th February 2025.
       Horizons NtK-stated deadline (based on its wording): Thursday,
       27th February 2025.
       This means that the NtK wording actually shortens the period by
       one day, making it non-compliant with PoFA. The NtK MUST give
       the full statutory 28-day period, but its incorrect wording
       results in an earlier deadline than PoFA allows.
       Is that clear?
       Use the POPLA appeal we provided in this case for an almost
       identical Horizon blooper. Just change the details to match your
       case:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/overstayed-parking/msg53263/#msg53263
       #Post#: 57266--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: JLA
       Date: February 9, 2025, 5:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you, understood.
       Have submitted appeal to Horizon today, will update when I get a
       response.
       Is it possible for me to edit my first post to remove certain
       details?
       #Post#: 59283--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: JLA
       Date: February 22, 2025, 5:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, quick update, just got this email from Horizon, appeal
       rejected as expected, will do POPLA appeal as advised
       previously.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/209NrXzX/Screenshot-20250222-111357-Drive.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/PsLQyB2B
       pablo neruda poems if you forget me
  HTML https://poetandpoem.com/Pablo-Neruda/If-You-Forget-Me
       #Post#: 59302--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: February 22, 2025, 7:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Is it possible for me to edit my first post to remove certain
       details?
       --- End Quote ---
       Edit function is time limited to prevent misuse. Send me a
       direct message with an updated version of what you want the
       first post to say and I'll edit it for you.
       #Post#: 59721--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: JLA
       Date: February 26, 2025, 3:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, was just doing appeal for POPLA and not sure if I'm being
       stupid but I make the last date for the 28 day period the 27th
       Feb if I include 31st Jan (the day after deemed given) and
       Horizon's NtK date for same period 26th Feb counting 30th Jan as
       day 1 of the 28 day period or have I got it wrong?
       Thanks.
       #Post#: 59727--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: b789
       Date: February 26, 2025, 4:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The POPLA code is actually valid for 33 days from the date of
       the appeal rejection. They allow 5 days for service of the
       letter.
       #Post#: 59729--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking Charge Overstay Tesco 1am
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: February 26, 2025, 4:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The original poster is asking about the PoFA 28 day period here.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page