DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 56962--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: February 6, 2025, 10:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=4326]Mentimate[/member] If this goes to the Tribunal,
one of us* will represent you and you can attend by phone too. I
have a live case to be heard shortly on the said issue.
*Me, if you wish. ;D (Should be I, nominative case, but who
cares these days?) :D
#Post#: 56986--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Mentimate
Date: February 6, 2025, 12:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [member=4326]Mentimate[/member] If this goes to the Tribunal,
one of us* will represent you and you can attend by phone too. I
have a live case to be heard shortly on the said issue.
>
> *Me, if you wish. ;D (Should be I, nominative case, but who
cares these days?) :D
>
--- End Quote ---
Really? Wow. Sounds too good to be true. I would be grateful.
You guys are amazing if this is what you do.
I was going to take the hit but if you say you can personally go
there and represent me I'll gladly accept and appeal. Think I'm
going to owe you a drink.
#Post#: 56992--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Mentimate
Date: February 6, 2025, 1:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [member=4326]Mentimate[/member] If this goes to the Tribunal,
one of us* will represent you and you can attend by phone too. I
have a live case to be heard shortly on the said issue.
>
> *Me, if you wish. ;D (Should be I, nominative case, but who
cares these days?) :D
>
--- End Quote ---
How did the case go?
#Post#: 57004--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: February 6, 2025, 3:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Mentimate link ---
>
> [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=4988.msg56962#msg56962
date=1738860286]
> [member=4326]Mentimate[/member] If this goes to the Tribunal,
one of us* will represent you and you can attend by phone too. I
have a live case to be heard shortly on the said issue.
>
> *Me, if you wish. ;D (Should be I, nominative case, but who
cares these days?) :D
>
--- End Quote ---
How did the case go?
[/quote]
17th February by video. I must buy some makeup. ;D
#Post#: 57061--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Mentimate
Date: February 7, 2025, 4:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [quote author=Incandescent link=topic=4988.msg56688#msg56688
date=1738719612]
> Periods for payment under the LLA & TfL Act 2003 are from date
of PCN. So the discount period starts on the PCN date, of 23rd
January, and is 14 days, so how they make it expiring on
Wednesday 19th Feb is beyond me; surely that date is the end of
the 28 days when payment of the £130 must be made or
representations submitted ?
>
--- End Quote ---
14 days expires from the date of the PCN. So the next day is the
increase.
Draft:
I make this formal representation in terms of a collateral
challenge.
Ground: The penalty charge discount amount date as published on
your website does not coincide with the 14 day period on the PCN
Letter.
I refer you to the screenshot* which incorrectly states the date
when you are legally allowed to increase the penalty to £130.
*
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/10PxX6dMsVD2RS69wzYP_A-JDRnC-0mFn/view?usp=drive_link
Choose: contravention did not occur.
[/quote]
Hi again,
After choosing contravention did not occur., I have to choose
one of the following mandatory options. wich one shall I choose
please?:
At the time I am supposed to have been in contravention, I was
loading and unloading
The restriction that I am supposed to have ignored was not
signed
At the time I am supposed to have been in contravention, the
restriction did not apply
At the time I am supposed to have been in contravention, I was
elsewhere
I was instructed by a police officer to do this
I'm not so sure I should be choosing any of those options. If
not, the only other viable way seems to be to choose I wish to
make representations about this PCN for other reasons, rather
than The contravention did not occur, in the previous step.
What do you think?
#Post#: 57063--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: February 7, 2025, 5:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Fun innit? Do the last one as you rightly suggest. And
screenshot all please for future use.
#Post#: 57102--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Mentimate
Date: February 7, 2025, 9:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> Fun innit? Do the last one as you rightly suggest. And
screenshot all please for future use.
>
--- End Quote ---
Submitted. Screen shotted each step (link below).
First image is what you get if you click 'The contravention did
not occur'. Selecting one of these options is mandatory.
HTML https://imgur.com/a/PzllZhb
HTML https://imgur.com/a/PzllZhb
Anything else you need just let me know. I'll keep you updated
on Lambeths response.
Thanks again
#Post#: 57219--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: February 8, 2025, 1:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Please keep an eye on their website and payment status.
#Post#: 58630--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Mentimate
Date: February 17, 2025, 2:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> Please keep an eye on their website and payment status.
>
--- End Quote ---
Just an update to say I haven't received a response to the
appeal sent on 7th Feb yet. Web site is still saying I have
until 19th Feb to pay lower fee of £65 (14 days from the PCN to
pay the lower fee ended on 6th Feb).
I'll keep a look out for appeal response. The say can take up to
18 days.
#Post#: 58645--------------------------------------------------
Re: 52 M Lambeth - Failing to comply with prohibition...
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: February 17, 2025, 3:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It really is critical that you screenshot everything. Just won a
case today on this issue. From the very beginning as their dates
and threats are all over the place.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 3
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page