URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 56620--------------------------------------------------
       Sutton, code 46 Stopped where prohibited (red route), O/S 46 -
       50 High Street SM3/TFL, Red Route Loading/Parking Bay
   DIR By: GavelSmash
       Date: February 4, 2025, 11:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       Context
       I've received a PCN from TFL for stopping in a red route
       loading/parking bay during restricted times (details below). I
       was dropping my wife off at an appointment she had with one of
       the shops on this high street. I had not noticed the signs and
       because the marked bays looked like on-street parking I assumed
       this was drop off was allowed. I must have stayed no more than 2
       mins but I understand now that drop off or pick up is restricted
       for these types of bays.
       Grounds of Appeal
       TSRGD Chapter 3 paragraph 16.1.4
       "All upright signs should face oncoming traffic as drivers need
       to be able to read them without stopping, otherwise they might
       be committing an offence."
       TSRGD Chapter 3 paragraph 16.2.5
       "All upright "no stopping" signs should normally face oncoming
       traffic, as mentioned in 16.1.4, otherwise a driver might be
       tempted to stop in a bay to read the sign, and in doing so risk
       the possibility of committing an offence."
       My issue is that no red route signs are facing the direction of
       traffic to inform drivers of the restrictions. Even further back
       along the road, the double and single red lines do not even have
       an upright sign. The road also has a slight curve making the
       parallel signs even more difficult to see especially given
       they're not immediately at the beginning of the marked bays.
       PCN Details
       PCN:
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/hy5wV5C
       GSV:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/4XnXvzsa6mJvYgjm9
       PCN no: GX21901392
       VRN: LF66JFK
       Date of notice: 20/01/2025
       What I have done so far
       I have challenged the PCN on the TfL websites and took a
       screenshot of this as confirmation. I added details
       "Contravention did not occur".
       I'm now waiting for a Notice of Rejection to take this up with
       the London Tribunal.
       Questions
       Have I made a mistake bypassing the TfL appeal? - I thought I'd
       just get a rejection anyway.
       Should I include anything about CCTV enforcement? - I think not
       since TfL won the recent judicial review on this.
       What do I expect if I go with a personal hearing? - I've never
       done anything like this before.
       I have drafted a statement for the London Tribunal which I can
       post here if this helps.
       I'm so grateful to have found this website. Thank you in
       advance!
       #Post#: 57287--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sutton, code 46 Stopped where prohibited (red route), O/S 46
       - 50 High Street SM3/TFL, Red Route Loading/Parking Bay
   DIR By: GavelSmash
       Date: February 9, 2025, 8:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I received the Notice of Rejection yesterday by email which
       landed in the the junk folder ::)
       For the benefit of others, make sure to add
       NoReply@tflenforcement.com to your mailbox safe sender rules.
       I was stationary between loading bay for less than one minute
       between 13:51:21 until 13:52:15. >:(
       I have attached the NoR with personal details redacted.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 57289--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sutton, code 46 Stopped where prohibited (red route), O/S 46
       - 50 High Street SM3/TFL, Red Route Loading/Parking Bay
   DIR By: GavelSmash
       Date: February 9, 2025, 8:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=1]cp8759[/member] do you think I've got a chance with
       this one at the London Tribunal?
       #Post#: 57290--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sutton, code 46 Stopped where prohibited (red route), O/S 46
       - 50 High Street SM3/TFL, Red Route Loading/Parking Bay
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: February 9, 2025, 9:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=4324]GavelSmash[/member] if you appeal promptly TFL will
       keep the PCN frozen at £80, so to an extent you have nothing to
       lose, and the Notice of Rejection has a flaw that has been
       accepted by every adjudicator where the point has been properly
       argued. I'll drop you a PM in case you'd like me to represent
       you.
       #Post#: 75941--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sutton, code 46 Stopped where prohibited (red route), O/S 46
       - 50 High Street SM3/TFL, Red Route Loading/Parking Bay
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: June 10, 2025, 7:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Outcome
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ryM_YlB_cimXHqm18Vq1V4ZwR81GDtu3/view.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1