URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 92389--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dcbl private parking 
   DIR By: b789
       Date: October 1, 2025, 11:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry to hear that. The silver lining is that you are only
       required to pay the original £100 charge and the fixed hearing
       fee. Consider how much they were trying to get from you, you can
       see that it is always worthwhile defending a claim as they will
       rarely get the total amount they are claiming.
       It has definitely cost them more than they will have recovered
       as they sent a representative to the hearing. That is likely to
       have cost them at least several hundred £ which they cannot
       recover. They have not recovered the £27 trial fee either. There
       is some Schadenfreude to be had for that. Hopefully, you have
       had a valuable life lesson on how the civil courts handle
       disputes.
       As long as the £135 judgment is paid in full within 30 days,
       there is no record of this on your credit file. It is completely
       expunged from the record.
       You appear to be confusing some terminology. You are the
       Defendant. Excel Parking are the Claimant.
       Did you not point out that you were unable to properly defend
       the claim as the claimants PoC were defective and did not
       adequately comply with CPR 16.4?
       Whilst you did raise the defective PoC/“ambush by WS” issues in
       your WS, the judge indicated the factual basis (payment
       attempts/system failure) should have been pleaded in the
       Defence, not only developed later in the WS/SWS. That’s a very
       common judicial stance in small claims: It's know as "Judge
       Bingo" and depending on which judge you get, they’ll often
       tolerate poor PoC but still expect the Defence to state the core
       factual case, then use the WS to evidence it. A different judge
       would likely have judged the other way.
       #Post#: 92413--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dcbl private parking 
   DIR By: Sabab4321
       Date: October 1, 2025, 1:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you so much
       I tried my best but I believe the result is still fair
       regardless
       I have learnt a lot and I should pay the money within the
       required days
       *****************************************************
       Page 9 of 9
   DIR Previous Page