URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 55535--------------------------------------------------
       Hammersmith & Fulham , PCN 52 M failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain types of vehicle 
   DIR By: Johnsmith86
       Date: January 28, 2025, 7:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello all,
       Unfortunately I have received the attached PCN dated 23/01/2025
       from Hammersmith & Fulham Council for a 52M alleged traffic
       contravention. I honestly did not see the signs, I was driving
       with my kids in the back and maybe wasn't concentrating fully on
       the signs but I did not spot them. The first time I found out
       about the alleged contravention was when I received the PCN.
       Obviously not seeing the signs/markings are not a valid reason
       to get a PCN cancelled so I would appreciate the forum's
       feedback on whether the PCN is worth challenging and if so on
       what basis. I will try and see if I can find the TMO.
       Many thanks in advance
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 55571--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham , PCN 52 M failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain types of vehicle 
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 28, 2025, 9:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Their sole evidence is a video which we need to see, but you've
       blanked out PCN Number and car reg so we can't go and look. Post
       it here if you can.
       #Post#: 55583--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham , PCN 52 M failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain types of vehicle 
   DIR By: Johnsmith86
       Date: January 28, 2025, 10:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, please find the video attached.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 55598--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham , PCN 52 M failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain types of vehicle 
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 28, 2025, 11:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Johnsmith86 link ---
       >
       > Hi, please find the video attached.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Video shows you charging past the signs without hesitation,
       following others who, of course, may be permit holders. I see no
       grounds at the moment for an appeal against the contravention
       itself, but this doesn't mean game-over, as there may well be a
       'technical' appeal based on H&F mismanagement of the enforcement
       process. Such appeals can and do win on their own, so see what
       others come up with.
       #Post#: 55658--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham , PCN 52 M failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain types of vehicle 
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: January 28, 2025, 4:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This council has a record of first-time cancellations including
       at this location.
       Were you going anywhere locally - they usually like that.
       Eg:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/imperial-road-failing-to-comply-with-a-prohibition-on-certain-types-of-vehicle-(/
       #Post#: 55664--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham , PCN 52 M failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain types of vehicle 
   DIR By: Johnsmith86
       Date: January 28, 2025, 4:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Johnsmith86 link=topic=4886.msg55583#msg55583
       date=1738082434]
       > Hi, please find the video attached.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Video shows you charging past the signs without hesitation,
       following others who, of course, may be permit holders. I see no
       grounds at the moment for an appeal against the contravention
       itself, but this doesn't mean game-over, as there may well be a
       'technical' appeal based on H&F mismanagement of the enforcement
       process. Such appeals can and do win on their own, so see what
       others come up with.
       [/quote]
       Yes I understand how it looks but when you have two hyper active
       boys in the back seat being silly, believe me its very easy to
       miss such signs and road markings plus it was my first time in
       that area.
       Like I said in my initial post, I am fully aware that not seeing
       the signs/markings are not a valid reason to get a PCN cancelled
       but I still believe I have nothing to lose if I appeal it. I was
       visiting the local Gambado kids play area so I could try and
       explain it was a mistake but I would rather challenge it on some
       other point (i.e. wording, signage, etc..) if possible.
       #Post#: 55677--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham , PCN 52 M failing to comply with a
       prohibition on certain types of vehicle 
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 28, 2025, 6:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Johnsmith86 link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Incandescent link=topic=4886.msg55598#msg55598
       date=1738085156]
       > [quote author=Johnsmith86 link=topic=4886.msg55583#msg55583
       date=1738082434]
       > Hi, please find the video attached.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Video shows you charging past the signs without hesitation,
       following others who, of course, may be permit holders. I see no
       grounds at the moment for an appeal against the contravention
       itself, but this doesn't mean game-over, as there may well be a
       'technical' appeal based on H&F mismanagement of the enforcement
       process. Such appeals can and do win on their own, so see what
       others come up with.
       [/quote]
       Yes I understand how it looks but when you have two hyper active
       boys in the back seat being silly, believe me its very easy to
       miss such signs and road markings plus it was my first time in
       that area.
       Like I said in my initial post, I am fully aware that not seeing
       the signs/markings are not a valid reason to get a PCN cancelled
       but I still believe I have nothing to lose if I appeal it. I was
       visiting the local Gambado kids play area so I could try and
       explain it was a mistake but I would rather challenge it on some
       other point (i.e. wording, signage, etc..) if possible.
       [/quote]
       Yes, yes, submit reps and you may get lucky ! Don't let me
       disuade you.
       Don't be confrontational, but emphasise your difficulties while
       driving around with your little loved ones, and being local, as
       Stamfordman suggests.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1