URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 55311--------------------------------------------------
       Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction - Notice
       of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: dsharif93
       Date: January 27, 2025, 6:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/OnEJfpl[/img]
       Hello everyone,
       I recently received a Notice of Rejection for my PCN appeal
       related to entering a box junction by the Bromley Council. My
       initial appeal was based on the de minimis principle, arguing
       that the alleged contravention was minor and did not obstruct
       traffic or cause any significant inconvenience. Unfortunately,
       the council has rejected this argument and upheld the PCN.
       I believe the de minimis principle is still applicable in this
       case, and I intend to take the matter to the Traffic Penalty
       Tribunal. I will be appealing with the same reasoning: the
       contravention, if it occurred, was insignificant and should not
       warrant a penalty.
       I have included details and evidence of the contravention in
       question. Could you please review the case and advise if you
       think an appeal based on de minimis has merit? Specifically, I
       would like your insights on:
       Whether the contravention meets the threshold for being
       considered "de minimis."
       Examples of similar cases where the appeal was successful on
       this basis.
       I appreciate any advice or experiences you can share to help
       strengthen my case for the tribunal.
       Thank you!
       (If needed, I can provide further details about the video
       evidence, duration of the stop in the box, or other specifics.)
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/9qYjOM7
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/JRnTmSe
       #Post#: 55316--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction -
       Notice of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: January 27, 2025, 6:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is a council PCN so I have moved this post to the Civil
       penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on)
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/<br
       />forum.
       To help the users there provide you with the best advice, please
       read the following thread carefully and provide as much of the
       information it requests as you are able to: READ THIS FIRST -
       **BEFORE POSTING YOUR CASE!**, This section is for council, TFL,
       Dart/Mersey/Tyne etc. cases
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/<br
       />
       #Post#: 55326--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction -
       Notice of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: January 27, 2025, 6:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As above, so below:
       Let's start with the whole PCN less personal details. AFAIR it
       has issues.  Indeed, it does as I have checked a recent case.
       There is also a problem with their website. This will need to go
       to the Tribunal and I would be more than happy to represent you.
       All by video these days very soon.
       #Post#: 55328--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction -
       Notice of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: January 27, 2025, 7:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The contravention is made out - harsh but I don't think on this
       alone you'd succeed at the tribunal.
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/Pi1jj74.gif
       #Post#: 55330--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction -
       Notice of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: January 27, 2025, 7:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The PCN is unenforceable.  Please do not pay and let's see it or
       you will join The Mugged Club.  PM sent.
       #Post#: 55354--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction -
       Notice of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: January 27, 2025, 8:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please also post a copy of your reps.
       #Post#: 55531--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction -
       Notice of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: dsharif93
       Date: January 28, 2025, 7:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is the appeal which i made and which was rejected by
       Bromley council - would this be good grounds to appeal at
       tribunal?
       Dear Sir/Madam,
       I am writing to formally appeal the Penalty Charge Notice (PCN)
       issued to my vehicle at the Croydon Road/Langley Road box
       junction.
       The alleged contravention pertains to my vehicle’s rear wheel
       being on the line at the very edge of the box junction. I
       believe this situation falls under the legal principle of de
       minimis and respectfully request that the penalty be
       reconsidered.
       Grounds for Appeal
       1.&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;Application of De Minimis
       The principle of de minimis recognises that minor, trivial
       infractions that have no material impact should not be
       penalised. In this instance, my vehicle’s rear wheel barely
       entered the box junction, and this slight encroachment did not
       hinder traffic flow or obstruct the junction in any way.
       2.&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;No Obstruction of Traffic
       The junction was entirely clear during this brief moment, and my
       vehicle did not impede any other road users. The purpose of the
       box junction is to ensure smooth traffic movement, which was
       fully maintained in this case. Additionally, there was a clear
       path ahead for my vehicle to exit the box junction.
       3.&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;Camera Angle and Evidence
       The enforcement camera footage appears to have been zoomed in on
       my license plate, thereby shortening the perspective of the
       junction. This perspective does not accurately show the full
       circumstances of the alleged contravention, including the clear
       path that was available for my vehicle to move forward.
       Supporting Legal Precedents
       •&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;The legal principle of de
       minimis non curat lex (the law does not concern itself with
       trifles) is well-established in adjudicating cases involving
       minor infractions.
       •&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;In Case Reference
       216036762A, the adjudicator allowed an appeal where the vehicle
       was stationary for a brief period in a box junction without
       causing any obstruction, recognising that such a trivial breach
       should not be penalised.
       •&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;&#8194;Similarly, in Case Reference
       2160303194, an appeal was allowed where a vehicle remained
       stationary for a brief moment without blocking traffic, and the
       adjudicator deemed this a minimal infraction.
       Request for Reconsideration
       I kindly ask that you review this case with a view to applying
       the de minimis principle and consider the limitations of the
       evidence provided. Given the trivial nature of the alleged
       contravention and the lack of impact on traffic, I request that
       this PCN be cancelled.
       Thank you for your time and understanding.
       Yours faithfully,
       D
       #Post#: 55555--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction -
       Notice of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: mickR
       Date: January 28, 2025, 9:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       see what [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] comes up with
       re your reps, personally I would have made the initial point
       being, contravention did not occur as there was space to exit
       the box in the left lane.
       you chose not to take that route as you (appear to have) thought
       you had exited the box.
       de minimis etc etc etc
       #Post#: 55632--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction -
       Notice of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: January 28, 2025, 2:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Where is the PCN?
       If it is like this it is unenforceable as it truncates the
       period in which they may disregard representations. They cannot
       do this from the date of the notice, only the date of service..
       The offending statement is from the date of the period above.
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3884.0;attach=8471
       2230446994
       This needs to go to the Tribunal and I am offering my free
       representation.
       #Post#: 55999--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Vehicle Entering and stopping in a Yellow box junction -
       Notice of rejection. Croydon Rd/Eden Road Beckenham
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: January 31, 2025, 7:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Appeal filed. The PCN is unenforceable.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page