DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 4206--------------------------------------------------
Re: TFL red route parking bay postal PCN - split from hijacked
thread
DIR By: Colin_S
Date: August 31, 2023, 7:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I recently appealed a similar PCN and as in the GSV images in
this case additionally found the signage defective.
Copied and pasted from my appeal text:
Firstly, the signage does not comply with the requirements of
the Traffic Signs Manual, Chapter 3, Paragraph 16.1.4 namely:
“All upright signs should face oncoming traffic as drivers need
to be able to read them without stopping, otherwise they might
be committing an offence.” The signage to the loading bay where
our vehicle was parked is parallel to the road and therefore
incompliant.
I've also sent the above email.
#Post#: 4225--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: TFL red route parking bay postal PCN
DIR By: Colin_S
Date: September 1, 2023, 3:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
My PCN is still with TFL. I challenged the original PCN online
but either TFL's system failed to register my challenge or I
screwed up submitting it and very frustratingly, didn't take a
screenshot of the submission either. I only discovered the
problem when a Charge Certificate arrived in the post yesterday.
I've resubmitted the challenge stating a possible fault in their
system for the late submission as I distinctly remember
completing all the various pages of the appeal process and noted
I had appealed the PCN on the form, as I always do - we get 20+
various tickets a year from various sources so I'm fairly
efficient at dealing with them. :'(
I'll let others comment on your appeal wording and whether it's
worth adding in my thoughts on the signage.
#Post#: 4367--------------------------------------------------
Re: TFL red route parking bay postal PCN - split from hijacked
thread
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: September 4, 2023, 5:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Colin_S you're going about this the wrong way. Please post up
all the documents you've received and we'll explain what you
actually need to do. Also please do not post about your case on
other peoples' threads.
#Post#: 7885--------------------------------------------------
Re: TFL red route parking bay postal PCN - split from hijacked
thread
DIR By: HS12
Date: October 20, 2023, 12:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ever get a response to this Colin? Thanks!
#Post#: 9644--------------------------------------------------
Re: TFL red route parking bay postal PCN - split from hijacked
thread
DIR By: Colin_S
Date: November 9, 2023, 1:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Email received from the London Tribunals today....
"The Enforcement Authority has informed the Tribunal that it
will not contest your appeal against the
Penalty Charge Notice(s) stated above.
The Adjudicator has therefore allowed your appeal without
considering the evidence or any details of
the case. You are not liable for any further charge(s) against
the Penalty Charge Notice(s) stated
above and, where appropriate, any amounts already paid will be
refunded by the Enforcement
Authority."
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1