URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 53801--------------------------------------------------
       Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in restricted
       street
   DIR By: Aubama
       Date: January 17, 2025, 7:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi there,
       I'd like advise on a pcn issued to my dad for alleged
       contravention 01: Parked in a restricted street during
       prescribed hours.
       My dad wanted to purchase some goods from the local shop 'Expo
       International'.  My dad is a 74 year old man with a shoulder
       replacement and the goods he wanted to buy are quite heavy.  His
       car was stationary outside the shop, from here my dad told the
       shop worker what he wanted and they loaded his car for him.  As
       they were loading my dad saw the traffic warden and explained
       that because of his shoulder replacement and lack of mobility he
       couldn't park far away to get the good needed.  The traffic
       warden appeared to understand and also agreed that my dad could
       quickly pop into the shop and pay for the good loaded into his
       car.
       Whilst my dad was inside the shop paying the traffic warden
       gave him a ticket and set off.
       I have attached evidence which is below and here is a gsv of the
       location:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/EGthfiUATP75RQeY6
       Please can I have advise on successfully appealing this pcn.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/nnfYzvp/IMG-1701.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/CMvYhZL
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/7rw662R/IMG-1702.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/ZcnkkWY
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/THNbfkx/IMG-1704.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/gDcP23L
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/xjz20bB/IMG-1707.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/KqV5kgf
       Thanks
       #Post#: 53807--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in
       restricted street
   DIR By: SITR
       Date: January 17, 2025, 8:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Loading is permitted until 16:30 according to the signage...it's
       the leaving the vehicle to go inside & pay that is the
       technicality at issue. Definitely worth appealing & as you've
       passed the reduced fee period, worth trying your luck at
       tribunal if the appeal is rejected.
       #Post#: 53810--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in
       restricted street
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: January 17, 2025, 8:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If the goods were preordered the loading exemption would be
       solid but if not wording in the right way referencing infirmity
       and the CEO interaction will hopefully see this cancelled.
       #Post#: 53861--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in
       restricted street
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 17, 2025, 1:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       At the Notice to Owner stage the discount option is lost, so you
       should now submit representation on the same lines as before.
       When they reject, (as they inevitably will !), they may reoffer
       the discount at which point your father must consider the two
       options, (1) pay the discounted amount or (2) register an appeal
       at London Tribunals.
       On the other hand if they do not re-offer the discount, it then
       becomes a total no-brainer to register an appeal at London
       Tribunals, because the penalty remains the same and there are no
       additional costs. If you lose the penalty is the existing PCN
       penalty, and if you win, you pay nothing.
       #Post#: 60080--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in
       restricted street
   DIR By: Aubama
       Date: March 1, 2025, 6:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi there, I have had a rejection letter from the council.
       Please advise what I can do next, I want to challenge this all
       the way
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/qYQtQBmv/Scan-20250228-1.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/jkXcXh3S
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/TMQNjjXf/Scan-20250228-2.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/0y0z44N7
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/6fcDx7h/Scan-20250228-3.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/DSPwyHX
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/21wrLCTQ/Scan-20250228-4.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/39wb8jnq
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/q3dKD6Gd/Scan-20250228-5.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/tT4gHRf4
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/84nsznZK/Scan-20250228-6.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/KzchNcv0
       #Post#: 60088--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in
       restricted street
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: March 1, 2025, 7:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well, their letter is complete and utter tosh about loading has
       to be continuous etc. Loading activity includes all the
       activities necessary to load goods into a vehicle, including
       going to collect those goods. Do they expect you to leave the
       vehicle open and unlocked whilst doing so. What nonsense !
       Anyway, with no re-offer of the discount, it is now a complete
       no-brainer to take them to London Tribunals, as there are no
       additional costs, and the penalty remains the same as it is now.
       #Post#: 60126--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in
       restricted street
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: March 1, 2025, 12:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Was there an initial challenge to the PCN?
       You didn't post your the reps to the NTO - what are they?
       The CEO notes about two different (sic) men claiming ownership
       etc - what is that about.
       #Post#: 60489--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in
       restricted street
   DIR By: Aubama
       Date: March 4, 2025, 5:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have a copy of the rejected appeal here below, I do want to
       fight this all the way so please help!!
       Dear Sir/Madam,
       I am writing to formally appeal against the PCN GR14115800,
       which was issued to my vehicle, registration number E072XLU, on
       09/12/2024 at 16:21 at Plumstead High Street for the alleged
       parking contravention Code 01 - "Parked in a restricted street
       during prescribed hours."
       The vehicle in question was stationary outside the shop ‘Expo
       International’ while I, a 74-year-old man with a shoulder
       replacement and limited mobility, purchased heavy goods. Due to
       my condition, parking further away would have been extremely
       difficult. I would like to explain the circumstances in detail:
       Exceptional Circumstances
       I remained by the vehicle and directed the shop staff to load
       the goods into the car. When a Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO)
       approached, I explained my situation, including my physical
       limitations and why I had to park nearby. The CEO appeared to
       understand and verbally agreed that I could quickly step into
       the shop to pay for the goods.
       Unfair Issuance of the Penalty
       Despite this understanding, the CEO issued the penalty charge
       while I was inside the shop paying for the goods, which took
       only a few moments. This was an unavoidable action due to the
       nature of the purchase and my physical condition. Given the
       circumstances, I believe the issuance of this penalty is unfair.
       Supporting Evidence
       To substantiate this appeal, I am providing the following:
       A copy of a doctor’s letter or medical evidence verifying my
       limited mobility due a shoulder replacement.
       A receipt from the shop confirming the purchase and the time of
       the transaction.
       I kindly ask you to consider these mitigating circumstances and
       cancel the penalty charge. My condition and the need to park
       briefly outside the shop to facilitate the purchase of heavy
       goods justify an exemption from this penalty.
       Thank you for your time and understanding. I look forward to
       hearing from you regarding the outcome of this appeal.
       Yours faithfully,
       #Post#: 60514--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in
       restricted street
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: March 4, 2025, 6:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Your circumstances are not mitigation, because you were
       undertaking loading, an exempt activity to the yellow line.
       So you now need to register an appeal against the PCN on the
       basis the contravention did not occur, reason loading.
       #Post#: 60518--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Plumstead High street, Contravention: 01 - Parked in
       restricted street
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: March 4, 2025, 6:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, pl look at your timeline and comments because something's
       not correct.
       Receipt timed at 16.01;
       PCN(which we've yet to see) giving time of contravention as
       16.21
       Council letter which states that the CEO observed for 2 minutes
       before issuing PCN, which brings the obs to 16.19.
       You say you went back inside to pay after seeing the CEO i.e.
       after 16.19, but the receipt was issued 10 minutes beforehand.
       Whereas there's nothing in evidence(except your own statements)
       regarding the period 16.09 - 16.19 it's therefore perfectly
       plausible that the purchase was made on foot so to speak and
       then the car was brought round to the shop for loading. But
       given your account here and in your reps you've rather
       undermined this approach.
       Pl rethink the sequence in the light of the objective evidence.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page